Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

According to your diagram you have the right side port attached to the pressure source on the turbo and the front port also attached to the pressure source on the plenum 

2 hours ago, kevboost7 said:

@joshuaho96 I'm sorry josh , i dont know if i'm dumb or missing something here, but your original diagram makes no sense with my configuration. I have internal waste gates.

This is what you said: "Port 1 is the blue line. Port 2 is the green line. Port 3 is also the green line. The key point is that you will have to modify the vacuum line for port 3. Instead of tying port 2 and 3 together you cap the vacuum line on the combo coolant/vacuum pipe and the line on the plenum goes directly to the valve. Port 2 has unchanged routing." 

based on that description of what you said above^^ this is what the connections should look like below:

image.thumb.png.7614208d64f527c79428a86c95a8f687.png

is that what you are suggesting? Port 1 on the Mac valve (vent to atmosphere) should go back to the turbo pressure?

No, look at this diagram again:

image.png.c081ff9d56a51d5e9f402a2ef04343
 

What you have drawn would put boost into port 1. The blue section is the intake before the turbos but after the MAFs.

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

No, look at this diagram again:

image.png.c081ff9d56a51d5e9f402a2ef04343
 

What you have drawn would put boost into port 1. The blue section is the intake before the turbos but after the MAFs.

Okay thats what i thought you were trying to say. I will give that a shot tomorrow. 

It just did not seem right, because every diagram i see on the internet has 1 port on the 3MAC Valve with the cap that vents to atmosphere. 

I'm still confused, on this diagram below with the twins. I thought that the "turbo pressure" line was the blue line. In the RB26, where is the turbo pressure line?

image.thumb.png.2d615cb2cdd191caeaed97d7c4045858.png

Edited by kevboost7

The "turbo pressure line" is the boost reference. This is commonly sourced from the compressor outlet. It can be from anywhere between the compressor outlet to the throttlebody. As the RB26 has a plenum UPSTREAM of the throttlebodies, the boost reference is obtained from the plenum.

Your circled (in red) line above is the green line on the coloured in RB26 plumbing diagram.

56 minutes ago, kevboost7 said:

Okay thats what i thought you were trying to say. I will give that a shot tomorrow. 

It just did not seem right, because every diagram i see on the internet has 1 port on the 3MAC Valve with the cap that vents to atmosphere. 

I'm still confused, on this diagram below with the twins. I thought that the "turbo pressure" line was the blue line. In the RB26, where is the turbo pressure line?

image.thumb.png.2d615cb2cdd191caeaed97d7c4045858.png

Turbo pressure line is the green line from the plenum. Almost all diagrams online just vent to atmosphere which is why you're confused. This is fine on speed density systems but it will cause an unmetered air leak on MAF-based systems. Even if it's nominally ok you really don't want to make a habit of it because it just makes it harder to diagnose what's wrong in the future.

@GTSBoy @joshuaho96 Thank you guys, and especially thank you josh for that diagram you made. It is clear for me now. Why does the 3 Port only come with 2 of the barb fittings? I will have to buy another barb fitting now. 

@r32-25t There are no professionals near me. I am learning, which is important to me and one of the reasons i got this car. 

And the one professional i took it too was my tuner, who told me to get rid of all the 30 year old hoses and just run  new hoses from the wastegates. I felt like there was a better way to do it. Thats why im on here. 

 

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

This is fine on speed density systems but it will cause an unmetered air leak on MAF-based systems. Even if it's nominally ok you really don't want to make a habit of it because it just makes it harder to diagnose what's wrong in the future.

The amount of air that comes out through a bleeder is too small to worry about wrt metering.

52 minutes ago, kevboost7 said:

Why does the 3 Port only come with 2 of the barb fittings?

Because, as Josh said, most people just vent it to atmosphere. I've had the 3rd port on my MAC valve open for at least 10 years and no wasps have ever tried to build a nest in there.

2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

The amount of air that comes out through a bleeder is too small to worry about wrt metering.

Because, as Josh said, most people just vent it to atmosphere. I've had the 3rd port on my MAC valve open for at least 10 years and no wasps have ever tried to build a nest in there.

While true, it's just easier IMO to put the hose on the solenoid instead of pulling it off and then forgetting it somewhere.

7 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

While true, it's just easier IMO to put the hose on the solenoid instead of pulling it off and then forgetting it somewhere.

The world isn't only RB26.

If I were to hook up a hose, I would have had to poke a hole into my turbo inlet pipe and weld on a nipple, because that's the only sensible place to send the vented signal air to. And....I didn't feel like doing that much extra work when I fitted the boost controller.

My previous boost controller was a pneumatic regulator based unit on an RB20. There was no venting, so my turbo inlet had no port on it for receiving vented air. And RB20s never had any boost control of any sort anyway.

1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

The world isn't only RB26.

If I were to hook up a hose, I would have had to poke a hole into my turbo inlet pipe and weld on a nipple, because that's the only sensible place to send the vented signal air to. And....I didn't feel like doing that much extra work when I fitted the boost controller.

My previous boost controller was a pneumatic regulator based unit on an RB20. There was no venting, so my turbo inlet had no port on it for receiving vented air. And RB20s never had any boost control of any sort anyway.

Yeah, it's very contextual. If you have to add a bunch of plumbing and general annoyance to "do it right" then I also wouldn't bother. On the RB26 venting directly to atmosphere means capping another port on that combo vaccum/coolant pipe under the plenum and figuring out how to keep track of a random hose/hose clamp 5+ years into the future. I have a mystery "firewall harness bolt" sitting in an organizer and it's taking up a non-trivial amount of my mental headspace trying to work out which of the five or so cars it could possibly have come from.

Blue is the vent. This is where the air that is released via the solenoid flows away. It is connected to the turbo inlet, so that it remains metered by the AFM(s) (and for emissions reasons, as there are rules about releasing engine gases to atmosphere).

The plenum is turbo pressure because you have ITBs. The plenum is upstream of the throttles, therefore the plenum is always at whatever boost pressure is at the turbo outlet (minus pressure drop from forcing a large amount of air through smallish pipes and an intercooler).

Thanks man. Im in the garage now. Dear god, that last hose is so far back. I forgot how much of a pain in the ass it was to work under the plenum. 

2 hours ago, kevboost7 said:

Thanks man. Im in the garage now. Dear god, that last hose is so far back. I forgot how much of a pain in the ass it was to work under the plenum. 

Every time I reach under there I have accepted that I'm shredding my gloves. Too many hose clamps and other sharp bits.

Does the factory boost gauge pressure = turbo pressure? Couldn't i just T into that line by the firewall? I mean its too late, i already shredded all the skin on my hands, but man..

https://www.gtrusablog.com/2019/06/where-do-i-tap-my-rb26-for-boost-sensor.html

No. The boost gauge is connected to the little boost log/plenum that is connected downstream of the throttles.

The two functions are totally different.

The boost control is for what the turbo is doing. So you have to measure what the turbo is doing, so you have to measure upstream of the throttle(s).

The boost gauge is for what the engine is doing. You want to know what the inlet manifold pressure is, which is the pressure that the engine is experiencing. You have to measure that after the throttle(s).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...