Jump to content
SAU Community

how do i install this 3 port mac valve for boost control?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, kevboost7 said:

@joshuaho96 I'm sorry josh , i dont know if i'm dumb or missing something here, but your original diagram makes no sense with my configuration. I have internal waste gates.

This is what you said: "Port 1 is the blue line. Port 2 is the green line. Port 3 is also the green line. The key point is that you will have to modify the vacuum line for port 3. Instead of tying port 2 and 3 together you cap the vacuum line on the combo coolant/vacuum pipe and the line on the plenum goes directly to the valve. Port 2 has unchanged routing." 

based on that description of what you said above^^ this is what the connections should look like below:

image.thumb.png.7614208d64f527c79428a86c95a8f687.png

is that what you are suggesting? Port 1 on the Mac valve (vent to atmosphere) should go back to the turbo pressure?

No, look at this diagram again:

image.png.c081ff9d56a51d5e9f402a2ef04343
 

What you have drawn would put boost into port 1. The blue section is the intake before the turbos but after the MAFs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

No, look at this diagram again:

image.png.c081ff9d56a51d5e9f402a2ef04343
 

What you have drawn would put boost into port 1. The blue section is the intake before the turbos but after the MAFs.

Okay thats what i thought you were trying to say. I will give that a shot tomorrow. 

It just did not seem right, because every diagram i see on the internet has 1 port on the 3MAC Valve with the cap that vents to atmosphere. 

I'm still confused, on this diagram below with the twins. I thought that the "turbo pressure" line was the blue line. In the RB26, where is the turbo pressure line?

image.thumb.png.2d615cb2cdd191caeaed97d7c4045858.png

Edited by kevboost7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "turbo pressure line" is the boost reference. This is commonly sourced from the compressor outlet. It can be from anywhere between the compressor outlet to the throttlebody. As the RB26 has a plenum UPSTREAM of the throttlebodies, the boost reference is obtained from the plenum.

Your circled (in red) line above is the green line on the coloured in RB26 plumbing diagram.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, kevboost7 said:

Okay thats what i thought you were trying to say. I will give that a shot tomorrow. 

It just did not seem right, because every diagram i see on the internet has 1 port on the 3MAC Valve with the cap that vents to atmosphere. 

I'm still confused, on this diagram below with the twins. I thought that the "turbo pressure" line was the blue line. In the RB26, where is the turbo pressure line?

image.thumb.png.2d615cb2cdd191caeaed97d7c4045858.png

Turbo pressure line is the green line from the plenum. Almost all diagrams online just vent to atmosphere which is why you're confused. This is fine on speed density systems but it will cause an unmetered air leak on MAF-based systems. Even if it's nominally ok you really don't want to make a habit of it because it just makes it harder to diagnose what's wrong in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@GTSBoy @joshuaho96 Thank you guys, and especially thank you josh for that diagram you made. It is clear for me now. Why does the 3 Port only come with 2 of the barb fittings? I will have to buy another barb fitting now. 

@r32-25t There are no professionals near me. I am learning, which is important to me and one of the reasons i got this car. 

And the one professional i took it too was my tuner, who told me to get rid of all the 30 year old hoses and just run  new hoses from the wastegates. I felt like there was a better way to do it. Thats why im on here. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

This is fine on speed density systems but it will cause an unmetered air leak on MAF-based systems. Even if it's nominally ok you really don't want to make a habit of it because it just makes it harder to diagnose what's wrong in the future.

The amount of air that comes out through a bleeder is too small to worry about wrt metering.

52 minutes ago, kevboost7 said:

Why does the 3 Port only come with 2 of the barb fittings?

Because, as Josh said, most people just vent it to atmosphere. I've had the 3rd port on my MAC valve open for at least 10 years and no wasps have ever tried to build a nest in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

The amount of air that comes out through a bleeder is too small to worry about wrt metering.

Because, as Josh said, most people just vent it to atmosphere. I've had the 3rd port on my MAC valve open for at least 10 years and no wasps have ever tried to build a nest in there.

While true, it's just easier IMO to put the hose on the solenoid instead of pulling it off and then forgetting it somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

While true, it's just easier IMO to put the hose on the solenoid instead of pulling it off and then forgetting it somewhere.

The world isn't only RB26.

If I were to hook up a hose, I would have had to poke a hole into my turbo inlet pipe and weld on a nipple, because that's the only sensible place to send the vented signal air to. And....I didn't feel like doing that much extra work when I fitted the boost controller.

My previous boost controller was a pneumatic regulator based unit on an RB20. There was no venting, so my turbo inlet had no port on it for receiving vented air. And RB20s never had any boost control of any sort anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

The world isn't only RB26.

If I were to hook up a hose, I would have had to poke a hole into my turbo inlet pipe and weld on a nipple, because that's the only sensible place to send the vented signal air to. And....I didn't feel like doing that much extra work when I fitted the boost controller.

My previous boost controller was a pneumatic regulator based unit on an RB20. There was no venting, so my turbo inlet had no port on it for receiving vented air. And RB20s never had any boost control of any sort anyway.

Yeah, it's very contextual. If you have to add a bunch of plumbing and general annoyance to "do it right" then I also wouldn't bother. On the RB26 venting directly to atmosphere means capping another port on that combo vaccum/coolant pipe under the plenum and figuring out how to keep track of a random hose/hose clamp 5+ years into the future. I have a mystery "firewall harness bolt" sitting in an organizer and it's taking up a non-trivial amount of my mental headspace trying to work out which of the five or so cars it could possibly have come from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blue is the vent. This is where the air that is released via the solenoid flows away. It is connected to the turbo inlet, so that it remains metered by the AFM(s) (and for emissions reasons, as there are rules about releasing engine gases to atmosphere).

The plenum is turbo pressure because you have ITBs. The plenum is upstream of the throttles, therefore the plenum is always at whatever boost pressure is at the turbo outlet (minus pressure drop from forcing a large amount of air through smallish pipes and an intercooler).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kevboost7 said:

Thanks man. Im in the garage now. Dear god, that last hose is so far back. I forgot how much of a pain in the ass it was to work under the plenum. 

Every time I reach under there I have accepted that I'm shredding my gloves. Too many hose clamps and other sharp bits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. The boost gauge is connected to the little boost log/plenum that is connected downstream of the throttles.

The two functions are totally different.

The boost control is for what the turbo is doing. So you have to measure what the turbo is doing, so you have to measure upstream of the throttle(s).

The boost gauge is for what the engine is doing. You want to know what the inlet manifold pressure is, which is the pressure that the engine is experiencing. You have to measure that after the throttle(s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For sure, bromance with common shit box interests.
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Aren't we already on one? SAU unforgettable bromance.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...