Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's not OBD1. It's Nissan Consult. Their own protocol. It's easily readable with any workshop grade diagnostic handset that has Nissan config files. I did it (for HICAS diagnosis) with a generic workshop handheld on my car back in about 2000, immediately before I rendered HICAS unable to f**k with me any more.

And 10 years after that I ripped out every single HICAS related thing in the car, except the CU (which is needed to keep the power steering happy).

HICAS is the devil. It is made to make 7/10ths drivers look like 9/10ths drivers. But if you drive the car harder than 7/10ths, it actively tries to kill you. It is too stupid to handle real driving.

HICAS is also very hard to diagnose, because from what I can tell, the CU rapidly forgets codes if the initiating failure does not stay present. So you can really only diagnose it while it is in the process of losing its mind.

'twere I you, I would put a HICAS delete kit on the car. With decent upgrades to suspension arms/bushes, tyres and a wheel alignment, the car will turn in 11ty times better than the apparent improvement given by HICAS back in the dim nostalgia days of the late 80s.

  • Like 1
8 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

It's not OBD1. It's Nissan Consult. Their own protocol. It's easily readable with any workshop grade diagnostic handset that has Nissan config files. I did it (for HICAS diagnosis) with a generic workshop handheld on my car back in about 2000, immediately before I rendered HICAS unable to f**k with me any more.

And 10 years after that I ripped out every single HICAS related thing in the car, except the CU (which is needed to keep the power steering happy).

HICAS is the devil. It is made to make 7/10ths drivers look like 9/10ths drivers. But if you drive the car harder than 7/10ths, it actively tries to kill you. It is too stupid to handle real driving.

HICAS is also very hard to diagnose, because from what I can tell, the CU rapidly forgets codes if the initiating failure does not stay present. So you can really only diagnose it while it is in the process of losing its mind.

'twere I you, I would put a HICAS delete kit on the car. With decent upgrades to suspension arms/bushes, tyres and a wheel alignment, the car will turn in 11ty times better than the apparent improvement given by HICAS back in the dim nostalgia days of the late 80s.

im in agreeance with you there, Im actively looking at the different kits and what all is into locking it out and getting rid of the light aside from unplugging the bugger. I see tomei has a kit that you can basically falsify the A-OKAY  report back to the ECU, and uses shims. I imagine that is probably the way to go, but im checking out my options as we speak.

9 minutes ago, oSkylines said:

I see tomei has a kit that you can basically falsify the A-OKAY  report back to the ECU, and uses shims. I imagine that is probably the way to go, but im checking out my options as we speak.

Nah. Complete removal and destruction. The use of lockout collars and lockout bars, retaining the crappy old tie rods and tie rod ends is....the nasty 90s style way of doing things. These days you can get brackets that are used to mount to control arms that replicate the setup of non-HICAS rear ends. These are literally called HICAS delete kits, as opposed to the HICAS lockout kits of yestercentury. You can knock the ball joints out of the steering arm on the knuckles and replace with bushes or bearings that get rid of the slop.

What I did instead was replace the entire rear subframe with a non-HICAS one, pulled out the solenoid valves, plumbing and changed the PS pump (this is an R32 with an R34 motor in it, so was hydraulic HICAS, which is the worst of them all, and the R34 motor brought along its PS pump for a no effort contribution to the HICAS eradication programme). But I suspect that that will be a bit harder on a GTR. I could use an A31 Cefiro subframe which I found lying around.

And you don't need to worry about any happiness or otherwise of the HICAS CU and anything it might say to the ECU. For one thing, you have a Haltech and it simply won't care under any circumstances. But I don't think even the stock ECU would give 2 shits. It certainly doesn't in the R32. Remember, these are vintage cars. Not the heavily integrated shitboxen of the last 20 years.

  • Like 1
3 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Nah. Complete removal and destruction. The use of lockout collars and lockout bars, retaining the crappy old tie rods and tie rod ends is....the nasty 90s style way of doing things. These days you can get brackets that are used to mount to control arms that replicate the setup of non-HICAS rear ends. These are literally called HICAS delete kits, as opposed to the HICAS lockout kits of yestercentury. You can knock the ball joints out of the steering arm on the knuckles and replace with bushes or bearings that get rid of the slop.

What I did instead was replace the entire rear subframe with a non-HICAS one, pulled out the solenoid valves, plumbing and changed the PS pump (this is an R32 with an R34 motor in it, so was hydraulic HICAS, which is the worst of them all, and the R34 motor brought along its PS pump for a no effort contribution to the HICAS eradication programme). But I suspect that that will be a bit harder on a GTR. I could use an A31 Cefiro subframe which I found lying around.

And you don't need to worry about any happiness or otherwise of the HICAS CU and anything it might say to the ECU. For one thing, you have a Haltech and it simply won't care under any circumstances. But I don't think even the stock ECU would give 2 shits. It certainly doesn't in the R32. Remember, these are vintage cars. Not the heavily integrated shitboxen of the last 20 years.

well, i can say an entire subframe swap is not likely something ill get that far into, but I am watching a video right now about the delete kits that essentially just replace the control arms and stuff to lock it into place. So, if the haltech isnt gunna care about the HICAS system if i lock it out, I'll likely just do that then. I did read on one of the HICAS threads that you actually were on ( i think from like 2021) something about pumps potentially overheating or something , so ill have to re-find exactually what was being talked about there for context, but i think it was something along the lines of if you were just blocking things off, whereas if you just delete the whole rear hicas system , there shouldnt BE any pumps to overheat, so unless the concern would be with some other pump somewhere its probably a nonissue. That being said, cant hurt to re-read so i can make sure i dont bugger something up unintentionally out of ignorance. 

So the potential issue with the pump is that it has 2 stages, the first is for power steer and the second for hicas. If you just block off the second stage outlet it will kill the pump.  

You need to either:

-Open the pump and remove the rear pump vanes, then block the outlet, or

-Reroute the power steering lines so the second stage feeds the PS cooler (then back to the reservoir) and the first stage just does the steering rack.

-replace the factory pump with a single stage pump, keep in mind the number of ribs in the PS belt are different between R32 (4 rib) and R33 (3 rib)

-loop the HCAS feed back to the HICAS return near the diff, although this keeps a lot of unnecessary weight and leak opportunities

  • Like 1
10 minutes ago, oSkylines said:

something about pumps potentially overheating

3 minutes ago, Duncan said:

So the potential issue with the pump is that it has 2 stages,

This is all only true for R32, which had hydraulic actuation of the rear rack. The R33 onwards cars had electric rear racks, which obviate all the hydraulic concerns.

Edited by GTSBoy
Just now, GTSBoy said:

This is all only true for R32, which had hydraulic actuation of the rear rack. The R33 onwards cars had electric rear racks, which obviate all the hydraulic concerns.

if this is accurate with the R33 not having  this issue, that is quite good news.

49 minutes ago, oSkylines said:

if this is accurate with the R33 not having  this issue, that is quite good news.

If by "this" you mean only the hydraulic associated issues with deleting HICAS, and not the fact that electric HICAS is still equally capable of trying to kill you as hydraulic HICAS is, then yes. It is easier to get rid of R33 HICAS than it is on R32.

  • Like 1
10 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

If by "this" you mean only the hydraulic associated issues with deleting HICAS, and not the fact that electric HICAS is still equally capable of trying to kill you as hydraulic HICAS is, then yes. It is easier to get rid of R33 HICAS than it is on R32.

i was just referring to not having to worry about the pumps on the 33 overheating, since its not the hydraulic system and doesnt have the extra fins and pumps and shit running to the back. 

 

As for the HICAS being a death trap at one point or another, You have me sold on that. Well you, mixed with the fact that my car tried to do the cupid shuffle on its own , nearly taking out a motorcycle driver ( if it had been moving to the left instead of the right on its random swerve)

18 minutes ago, oSkylines said:

i was just referring to not having to worry about the pumps on the 33 overheating, since its not the hydraulic system and doesnt have the extra fins and pumps and shit running to the back. 

 

As for the HICAS being a death trap at one point or another, You have me sold on that. Well you, mixed with the fact that my car tried to do the cupid shuffle on its own , nearly taking out a motorcycle driver ( if it had been moving to the left instead of the right on its random swerve)

Almost every I know with an R32 GTR has some story about the HICAS trying to steer them in an unintended direction. The R33s seem more reliable in that regard. I'm pretty sure my HICAS is not locked out and I can't even really tell if it's working or not.

8 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Almost every I know with an R32 GTR has some story about the HICAS trying to steer them in an unintended direction. The R33s seem more reliable in that regard. I'm pretty sure my HICAS is not locked out and I can't even really tell if it's working or not.

well, if the R33 is more reliable in this regard, maybe i am just wildly unlucky. Either way , If im planning on making changes in the near future by way of increasing power , after this week, I want mine off and in a dumpster somewhere. The injectors are the last part im waiting for to upgrade my fuel system at the moment, and then I have to run a few logs for my tune, one of which being a WOT run. Last few times i did my WOTs i was somewhere up in the 130ish mph area... I dont even want to know what would would've happened if my HICAS decided to go rogue on me when I'm doing my WOTs for tuning. 

Edited by oSkylines
4 hours ago, oSkylines said:

well, if the R33 is more reliable in this regard, maybe i am just wildly unlucky. Either way , If im planning on making changes in the near future by way of increasing power , after this week, I want mine off and in a dumpster somewhere. The injectors are the last part im waiting for to upgrade my fuel system at the moment, and then I have to run a few logs for my tune, one of which being a WOT run. Last few times i did my WOTs i was somewhere up in the 130ish mph area... I dont even want to know what would would've happened if my HICAS decided to go rogue on me when I'm doing my WOTs for tuning. 

I have had two separate R32 owners tell me about 2-3 incidents where they were either in a turn and the HICAS was trying to make the car go straight or they were going straight and the rear end was crabbing out to try and make the car turn. Neither could get it to reproduce again afterwards. It absolutely destroys confidence in a car when the system can randomly misbehave like that. My R33 doesn't do that but I have heard of bad yaw sensors causing behavior like the rear end crabbing out under braking or excessive vibration/exhaust noise doing something similar as well. The R32 doesn't have any form of feedback control and as far as I can tell the HICAS is really far more aggressive compared to the R33.

HICAS in the R32 and R33 both belong in the bin.

First real handling mod I did was delete HICAS, followed by a proper mechanical LSD (albeit I have a GTS-t shit box).

R34 HICAS is barely ok, if I had a R34 I would delete it as well.

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

I have heard of bad yaw sensors causing behavior like the rear end crabbing out

No yaw sensors in HICAS. It's usually the steering angle sensor, but also can originate in the HICAS CU. The Oz delivered R32 GTRs had a factory recall to repair the CUs which sometime had a loose screw running around inside shorting shit out, and electrolytic capacitors all eventually reach EOL, etc etc.

 

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

The R32 doesn't have any form of feedback control

No HICAS has any form of closed loop. It just sends out the "wiggle the rear end signal" when it thinks you'd like it to turn in. If that happens to be when you are sawing away at the wheel trying to fight understeer midcorner on a wet track, then so be it!

37 minutes ago, niZmO_Man said:

My HICAS actively tries to kill me (random kicks in the steering, rear end is looser than a drunk 18 year old at Ivy).

That 1986 shit should go straight in the bin.

Please delete it.

  • Like 1
11 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

No yaw sensors in HICAS. It's usually the steering angle sensor, but also can originate in the HICAS CU. The Oz delivered R32 GTRs had a factory recall to repair the CUs which sometime had a loose screw running around inside shorting shit out, and electrolytic capacitors all eventually reach EOL, etc etc.

 

No HICAS has any form of closed loop. It just sends out the "wiggle the rear end signal" when it thinks you'd like it to turn in. If that happens to be when you are sawing away at the wheel trying to fight understeer midcorner on a wet track, then so be it!

image.thumb.jpeg.89539a505f7ffa85e5a8fb421945bbed.jpeg

As far as I know there's actually a yaw sensor in the back of the R33 and R34 GTR which is used for HICAS. It vaguely helps maybe. In practice the R33 and R34 group N cars AFAIK kept the yaw sensor but deleted the HICAS and fed the signal into the ATTESA/ABS controller instead to control the A-LSD.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
×
×
  • Create New...