Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey, is there a known restriction in the R34 GTT fuel return? I tested my fuel pressure with a Walbro 255, and have 52 psi at idle, with the regulator vacuum line on and off.

The only time I get 43 psi is if I fully disconnect the return line off the regulator and let it flow out into a bottle, so it seems to be something after the reg causing it.

I've disconnected both ends of the return line and I can blow through it. I went under the car and don't see any dents or kinks in the hard lines. I blew air into the return port of the fuel hat and it's harder to blow through, but I'm guessing that's because of that tank transfer valve attached to it. I’ve replaced the return lines from the reg to the hard lines as well

Any ideas? Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/484962-er34-fuel-return/
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Yeah the venturi/siphon inside the fuel tank lid.

Either you drill it out or replace it with a radium venturi/siphon or go tits out get a FFG fuel tank lid and replace the OEM unit.

Makes sense, I was thinking it had to be that thing. I will try modifying it first and see if I can get it to work. Is it drilling out the fittings on the hat, or drilling out the actual siphon pump?
IMG_1401.thumb.jpeg.327d0ab370bf04413efc17ce4d74b4e8.jpegIMG_1402.thumb.jpeg.91eee0fd4e0a5c42a6f8735e27d1ad9d.jpeg

2 hours ago, tylink720 said:

drilling out the actual siphon pump

It's a nozzle used to generate the suction. It's sized to produce enough suction with the stock fuel flow driving it. If you upsize the pump then you have to squeeze that increase through there. And you get LOTS of suction.

I don't know how much to drill it out. Remember that cross sectional area increases with the square of diameter, so you probably don't want to drill it out a lot, for "only" a 255L/h pump. You're up about 25-30% on stock capacity, so you probably only need about a 10-15% diameter increase.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

I've drilled out the siphon pump to a little larger than stock, I think I used a 5/16 bit. Put it back together and still had the 50psi fuel pressure. Took it apart again and ended up breaking one of the fittings on my fuel hat which sucked, but luckily I was able to get a new one within a week. Fit the new hat, and tested the pressure with the siphon pump removed so it just pumps straight back into the tank, still 50psi. 

I have to assume now it's my return line that's the restriction. I was hoping it would be easy to replace the rear fuel lines that connect to the tank, but it looks like I'd have to lower or drop the tank which looks like a crap job. I will try using an air compressor first to blast out the return line and see if it does anything

24 minutes ago, tylink720 said:

I've drilled out the siphon pump to a little larger than stock, I think I used a 5/16 bit. Put it back together and still had the 50psi fuel pressure. Took it apart again and ended up breaking one of the fittings on my fuel hat which sucked, but luckily I was able to get a new one within a week. Fit the new hat, and tested the pressure with the siphon pump removed so it just pumps straight back into the tank, still 50psi. 

I have to assume now it's my return line that's the restriction. I was hoping it would be easy to replace the rear fuel lines that connect to the tank, but it looks like I'd have to lower or drop the tank which looks like a crap job. I will try using an air compressor first to blast out the return line and see if it does anything

You had the same idea I did. If that doesn't do it start measuring pressure at various points in the system, the pressure drops at each point will tell you where the restriction is. Could be an FPR too. If you've hardwired your fuel pump to run full blast all the time the FPR is almost certainly your problem at idle. Nissan used the FPCM to slow down the pump at idle.

Edited by joshuaho96
  • Like 1

Try bypass the fuel dampener to see if there's still an issue.

R34 GT-t uses a couple of them instead of 1x like the R33.

If that solves the issue, then delete the OEM ones and install an aftermarket one like a Radium one.

 

In the past, on S15s (same fuel tank hat/lid as the R34) I enlarge the siphon/venturi and it fixes the issue. Was hoping that was enough for you.

  • Like 1
On 10/4/2023 at 2:35 PM, joshuaho96 said:Could be an FPR too. If you've hardwired your fuel pump to run full blast all the time the FPR is almost certainly your problem at idle. Nissan used the FPCM to slow down the pump at idle.

I don’t think it’s the FPR as I’ve run a short hose into a bottle straight off the reg, and the pressure drops down. Maybe a new reg is a good idea anyway though. I will try doing what you said and test down the line. Although the only spot I can measure is between the hard line and tank, but it’s cramped as in there. I’ll have to lower the tank to get in there. 

On 10/4/2023 at 5:47 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:Try bypass the fuel dampener to see if there's still an issue.

R34 GT-t uses a couple of them instead of 1x like the R33

Yep I bypassed the dampener on the fuel return line too but didn’t help. I still have the dampener on the feed. Maybe I’ll test bypassing that one too as I put the gauge before it. 

15 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Hang on, are you running the stock FPR? If so, get an aftermarket one

Yep stock reg. Ill look into a new reg, just seems strange that it drops the pressure fine when I remove the return line. Also seen posts on here saying the stock reg is good for mild pump upgrades. It is 25 years old I guess

1 hour ago, tylink720 said:

 Also seen posts on here saying the stock reg is good for mild pump upgrades.

Car still might work however the fuel pressure is probably all over the shop like you've just discovered.

1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Car still might work however the fuel pressure is probably all over the shop like you've just discovered.

Alright, I've started looking for an aftermarket reg. This cars been a bottomless pit so far, and I haven't even started the proper power mods yet lol.

thanks

5 hours ago, tylink720 said:

Yep stock reg. Ill look into a new reg, just seems strange that it drops the pressure fine when I remove the return line. Also seen posts on here saying the stock reg is good for mild pump upgrades. It is 25 years old I guess

If you want to run the stock regulator you need to keep some method of making sure you aren’t trying to flow 255lph of fuel at idle. Otherwise you will experience what you’re talking about. 

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, tylink720 said:

 This cars been a bottomless pit so far, and I haven't even started the proper power mods yet lol.

Welcome to Skyline ownership, cheaper and more reliable buying a BMW M2 Comp, but here we all are lol.

1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Welcome to Skyline ownership, cheaper and more reliable buying a BMW M2 Comp, but here we all are lol.

Yep lol, half the fun is working on these piles. My brother has a newer BMW and it’s super quick and reliable

Any current recs for a good budget reg? I don’t want to buy some cheap eBay stuff, but also don’t want to drop $500 on just a regulator. I’ve seen some for about $140-$170 like Tomei, P2M, NRG, AEM, ect

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...