Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Purchased a NC MX5 a while ago

Basic suspension mods done, BC coils and Whiteline sway bars 

New DBA calipers, discs and pads

Added some 17 x 8 Konig Decagrams with 215/45 17 PS5's

20241224_184757.thumb.jpg.9e1b76dda37abe81d09502f7c170e0d4.jpg

Added some typical NA bolt on's, i.e. full exhaust and intake 

Added 0.5ltrs with a MZR2.5 swap, nice bump in torques 

Found a detachable hard top which is locked in for a colour match with my local paint shop in Feb 25, this also includes some PDR as it has received a few love taps from parking in the local shops when in the hands of my Minister for War and Finances, me, I park nowhere near other cars and typically park on the street

The little thing is awesome, I drive it everywhere, it handles like a dream whether I'm up it or just cruising 

But now,  because I'm a idiot, I keep looking at turbo kits....... did I mention I'm a idiot

20241214_161237.thumb.jpg.9fee8c0861213dd933614062ee483e2d.jpg

Why is dose so appealing 

All of the NA 2.5 glory, well.......until sometime in 2025 anyway....🤪

20241224_184725.thumb.jpg.a3b0c1794b5d57fecf858a6298ce2ca9.jpg

 

  • Like 6
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/
Share on other sites

Turbo gods, some assistance and recommendations please

I'm looking into a turbo kit for my 2.5 from MX5 Mania >>>>> https://mx5mania.com.au/products/copy-of-mx-5-nc-2-5-litre-engine-conversion-turbo-2005-2013

Power wise I would like about 200kw atw, and of course dose noises, apparently if you keep a stock 2.5 under around 200kwatw the engine and drivetrain will not hate life even when ragging on it a bit

Max RPM on the 2.5 is around 6500rpm

The turbo MX5 use is something around the disco potato size as  packaging room for the turbo is pretty limited, which will, I believe, give me my power goals I want and not have the turbo either under, or oversized, but the rear housing bit is confusing 

It comes with either a 0.64 or 0.86

From my understanding, which so far is based off googling, so make of that what you will

0.64:

spools faster = good

Makes more EGT heat on boost = bad

Less topend power than 0.86 = I'm only looking for 200 atw so that point may be mute????, I don't know, hence my questions 

0.86:

Spools a "little" slower = how much slower??? remembering 6500 is my max rpm

Makes less EGT heat = good

Makes a little more power up top = again, power goals is only around 200

Also, this is a street car, so there will not really be any long track sessions, in saying this I would want it so it was happy with at least 3 hot laps at Wakefield Park if the need arises 

I already have a fancy pants triple pass radiator, and a oil cooler with thermostat will be getting installed as well

Thanks for any information or recommendations you have 👍, and of course, the comments about me wasting money on drive in drive out modifications, or any other snide remarks about my manhood for owning a MX5 🤣

 

the-castle-farouk.thumb.gif.0bd20237d18d3c4936c48848844adb5e.gif

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996089
Share on other sites

This should be pretty easy.

200rwkW is just about the max power out of an RB25 stock turbo. So, 12ish psi on a 2.5L. That boost limited mainly by the prospect of seeing the turbine in the cat after the smoke show. A steel wheeled equivalent would likely happily do ~220rwkW at something like 17 psi, where it would probably be bumping into the usual limits of such a sized turbo.

These things have like a .48 rear.

You will not need the 0.86 rear. The 0.64 will be fine. In fact, if you were looking at various mid-200rwkW options for RBs, most of them would be in a 0.64 rear. So, I think you will definitely want to be no bigger than that for a same sized but probably even more efficient (at making power) modern engine.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996093
Share on other sites

No detail on compressor or turbine sizes, which doesn't help with housing size selection with that kit.

However, from SR20DET mucking about and money torching perspective, a GTX2860R Gen 2 w/ 0.64 (46mm inducer) will do ~260kW on E85 about 1.5bar of boost. All in before 3000pm, which cause a gearbox to shatter.

Now imagine the same turbo, on a modern motor with an extra 0.5L of displacement, and heaps of cam timing adjustability (not an on/off affair like the Nissan shit boxes).

If this was my car (which I would never own or consider buying, ever!), I would go for a nice twin scroll setup, and a G30-660. Gates plumbed back, no silly shit. Lean on the cam timing, big displacement to create a flat-ish torque curve.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996096
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Bogan said:

Turbo gods, some assistance and recommendations please

I'm looking into a turbo kit for my 2.5 from MX5 Mania >>>>> https://mx5mania.com.au/products/copy-of-mx-5-nc-2-5-litre-engine-conversion-turbo-2005-2013

Power wise I would like about 200kw atw, and of course dose noises, apparently if you keep a stock 2.5 under around 200kwatw the engine and drivetrain will not hate life even when ragging on it a bit

Max RPM on the 2.5 is around 6500rpm

The turbo MX5 use is something around the disco potato size as  packaging room for the turbo is pretty limited, which will, I believe, give me my power goals I want and not have the turbo either under, or oversized, but the rear housing bit is confusing 

It comes with either a 0.64 or 0.86

From my understanding, which so far is based off googling, so make of that what you will

0.64:

spools faster = good

Makes more EGT heat on boost = bad

Less topend power than 0.86 = I'm only looking for 200 atw so that point may be mute????, I don't know, hence my questions 

0.86:

Spools a "little" slower = how much slower??? remembering 6500 is my max rpm

Makes less EGT heat = good

Makes a little more power up top = again, power goals is only around 200

Also, this is a street car, so there will not really be any long track sessions, in saying this I would want it so it was happy with at least 3 hot laps at Wakefield Park if the need arises 

I already have a fancy pants triple pass radiator, and a oil cooler with thermostat will be getting installed as well

Thanks for any information or recommendations you have 👍, and of course, the comments about me wasting money on drive in drive out modifications, or any other snide remarks about my manhood for owning a MX5 🤣

 

the-castle-farouk.thumb.gif.0bd20237d18d3c4936c48848844adb5e.gif

 

STOP GOOGLING

FAB9 MAKE BORG WARNER EFR KITS FOR THE NC. THEY PACKAGE AN EFR 6758.

DO NOTHING ELSE. CAPS INTENTIONAL. THE BEST RESPONSIVE SETUP EXISTS FOR YOUR CAR, AND HAS BEEN PROVEN FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW.

IN B4 "BUT I WANT EVEN MORE RESPONSE, IN A SIMPLER, MORE RELIABLE PACKAGE" WHICH IS A LS.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996101
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kinkstaah said:

STOP GOOGLING

FAB9 MAKE BORG WARNER EFR KITS FOR THE NC. THEY PACKAGE AN EFR 6758.

DO NOTHING ELSE. CAPS INTENTIONAL. THE BEST RESPONSIVE SETUP EXISTS FOR YOUR CAR, AND HAS BEEN PROVEN FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW.

IN B4 "BUT I WANT EVEN MORE RESPONSE, IN A SIMPLER, MORE RELIABLE PACKAGE" WHICH IS A LS.

I somehow quoted my post instead of editing it. I regret nothing.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996102
Share on other sites

I know you don't want to hear this comment, but I can't not say it. 

I just can't see 200kw being worth the time and effort. Its like guys with NA cars, putting in headers/exhaust/tune for a massive 20% jump in power. Great, the slow car is still slow and you're down $10,000. 

My vote is leave it NA or price in a gearbox upgrade and shoot for at least 300KW, preferably 350KW+. 

Now you have a NC that will try to kill you from time to time and will be exciting to drive :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996106
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Murray_Calavera said:

I know you don't want to hear this comment, but I can't not say it. 

I just can't see 200kw being worth the time and effort. Its like guys with NA cars, putting in headers/exhaust/tune for a massive 20% jump in power. Great, the slow car is still slow and you're down $10,000. 

My vote is leave it NA or price in a gearbox upgrade and shoot for at least 300KW, preferably 350KW+. 

Now you have a NC that will try to kill you from time to time and will be exciting to drive :)

This isn't for lotsa powers, and time and effort isn't even a thing I'm concerned about

The whole reason is "Just because fun", and "Just because fun" is what I do

And whilst there are other kits, with better and more modern turbos (Rev9 use the same Kraken manifold I believe), where in Sydney can I do a drive in drive out with the after sales support that MX5 Mania give

My Turbo 86 made around 200kwatw on a AVO turbo kit, and was over 100kg heavier than the MX5, but it was a blast to drive around the streets, until I crashed it.....DOOH, so somewhere around 200 ish level and some whooshy noises and I'll be happy driving to work, the shops, or heading into the country with Jackie for Devonshire tea

So, thanks Dose for your info, it sounds like a 0.64 will be fine for what I'm after👍

The only real racing I do nowadays is to the toilet

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996108
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

STOP GOOGLING

FAB9 MAKE BORG WARNER EFR KITS FOR THE NC. THEY PACKAGE AN EFR 6758.

DO NOTHING ELSE. CAPS INTENTIONAL. THE BEST RESPONSIVE SETUP EXISTS FOR YOUR CAR, AND HAS BEEN PROVEN FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW.

IN B4 "BUT I WANT EVEN MORE RESPONSE, IN A SIMPLER, MORE RELIABLE PACKAGE" WHICH IS A LS.

 

11 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

No detail on compressor or turbine sizes, which doesn't help with housing size selection with that kit.

However, from SR20DET mucking about and money torching perspective, a GTX2860R Gen 2 w/ 0.64 (46mm inducer) will do ~260kW on E85 about 1.5bar of boost. All in before 3000pm, which cause a gearbox to shatter.

Now imagine the same turbo, on a modern motor with an extra 0.5L of displacement, and heaps of cam timing adjustability (not an on/off affair like the Nissan shit boxes).

If this was my car (which I would never own or consider buying, ever!), I would go for a nice twin scroll setup, and a G30-660. Gates plumbed back, no silly shit. Lean on the cam timing, big displacement to create a flat-ish torque curve.

 

 

 

 

7 hours ago, Murray_Calavera said:

I know you don't want to hear this comment, but I can't not say it. 

I just can't see 200kw being worth the time and effort. Its like guys with NA cars, putting in headers/exhaust/tune for a massive 20% jump in power. Great, the slow car is still slow and you're down $10,000. 

My vote is leave it NA or price in a gearbox upgrade and shoot for at least 300KW, preferably 350KW+. 

Now you have a NC that will try to kill you from time to time and will be exciting to drive :)

This isn't for lotsa powers, and time and effort isn't even a thing I'm concerned about

The whole reason is "Just because fun", and "Just because fun" is what I do

And whilst there are other kits, with better and more modern turbos (Rev9 use the same Kraken manifold I believe.....EDIT... nope, the Kraken is a cast jobbie, the REv9 uses welded up stainless, plus $8000 AUD before shipping, installation and tuning)

Where else in Sydney can I do a drive in drive out with the after sales support that MX5 Mania give

My Turbo 86 made around 200kwatw on a AVO turbo kit that Pulse fitted, and it was over 100kg heavier than the MX5, but it was a blast to drive around the streets, until I crashed it.....DOOH, so somewhere around 200 ish level and some whooshy noises and I'll be happy driving to work, the shops, or heading into the country with Jackie for Devonshire tea

So, thanks Dose for your info, it sounds like a 0.64 will be fine for what I'm after👍

The only real racing I do nowadays is to the toilet

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996109
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

No detail on compressor or turbine sizes, which doesn't help with housing size selection with that kit.

PULSAR PSR2860R 0.86A/R or 0.64 GEN 2 Turbocharger

Both are -50*67mm 8 blade billet compressor wheel

Cheers

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996110
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, The Bogan said:

PULSAR PSR2860R 0.86A/R or 0.64 GEN 2 Turbocharger

Both are -50*67mm 8 blade billet compressor wheel

Cheers

 

What kind of power delivery are you after?

If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun.

I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred.

Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996112
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

What kind of power delivery are you after?

If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun.

I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred.

Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 

Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car

I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right???

I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics 

Cheers for the useful information 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996113
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, The Bogan said:

Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car

I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right???

I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics 

Cheers for the useful information 

Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it.

It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5.

And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/486007-nc-mx5/#findComment-7996114
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...