Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello everybody. I have no idea where to get a ethanol tester besides online and want to run a e30 mix in my bmw m2. In order for my calculator to work i need to know what ethanol rating the e85 pump is and this is my local station would anyone know or is it negligible to find specifically.

Thanks🙂

United E85 is always 85% ethanol. At least it claims to be.

But that goes out of the window about thirty seconds after you put a tank of it into your car and can't do the math to determine if you have 76% ethanol, or 47% ethanol or 26% ethanol because you put 33L in, then 16L in, then a full tank of 98, then "Some" E85.

Ethanol tunes that aren't full flex or full E85 all the time are just absolutely a waste of time. Don't be stupid and ruin your car.

7 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

United E85 is always 85% ethanol. At least it claims to be.

But that goes out of the window about thirty seconds after you put a tank of it into your car and can't do the math to determine if you have 76% ethanol, or 47% ethanol or 26% ethanol because you put 33L in, then 16L in, then a full tank of 98, then "Some" E85.

Ethanol tunes that aren't full flex or full E85 all the time are just absolutely a waste of time. Don't be stupid and ruin your car.

So your saying e30 is a wate of time? there's plenty of solid calculators out there that can give you the exact amount flex fuel just re adjusts the tune for you which you wont have to do if you just calculate it accurately. and the point of running e30 over e85 is to not ruin your fuel lines. 

1 hour ago, crustycereal said:

So your saying e30 is a wate of time? there's plenty of solid calculators out there that can give you the exact amount flex fuel just re adjusts the tune for you which you wont have to do if you just calculate it accurately. and the point of running e30 over e85 is to not ruin your fuel lines. 

E30 and E85 will both be reacting with whatever they can. One just has a little less in it and will take a little longer for you to see the things it's reacting with.

Plenty of replacement stuff out there that's ethanol friendly, and then it won't matter what Ex blend you run once you do a full flex tune.

Also fill flex would still be beneficial to you, even for the minor % changes down at E30.

3 hours ago, crustycereal said:

because the cheapest one is over 1k lol

What ECU are you using? The flex sensors I'm used to working with normally cost around $300.

If you don't have a way of tuning the car, how do you plan to safely run e30?

It's not that E30 is bad. I recently did a track day and half of the reason I took ethanol is because when I ran out of jerries, 'some' ethanol is better than none for protection and stuff, even N/A.

The problem with E30 is attempting to maintain E30. It's an akward target to hit and the maths required make the whole thing near impossible very fast.

2 hours ago, MBS206 said:

E30 and E85 will both be reacting with whatever they can. One just has a little less in it and will take a little longer for you to see the things it's reacting with.

Plenty of replacement stuff out there that's ethanol friendly, and then it won't matter what Ex blend you run once you do a full flex tune.

Also fill flex would still be beneficial to you, even for the minor % changes down at E30.

High ethanol concentrations all the time is bad for the fuel system. Not because ethanol has some inherent issue assuming you've done your fuel system setup correctly, but because PIB isn't soluble in ethanol and it contaminates the entire supply of fuel in practice. It is soluble in gasoline so you want to run a tank of normal pump gas every so often to flush all of that out before it causes an injector or something to clog.

5 hours ago, crustycereal said:

because the cheapest one is over 1k lol

From this comment, I'm assuming you're on the MHD platform.

Put it this way, $1k is cheaper than putting a hole through the block.

5 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

From this comment, I'm assuming you're on the MHD platform.

Put it this way, $1k is cheaper than putting a hole through the block.

I would never run E85 without an ethanol content sensor. Just not worth the headache. Having to reflash the tune and only refill the tank when it's very nearly empty is super annoying.

  • Like 1
11 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

I would never run E85 without an ethanol content sensor.

Plenty of people have been doing exactly that in Australia for many years.

All it takes is to only fill up at servos with E85. And that is not that difficult. I drive past several such every day.

The main pain is the consumption rate and having to fill up more often and stash more jerry cans in the shed.

35 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Plenty of people have been doing exactly that in Australia for many years.

All it takes is to only fill up at servos with E85. And that is not that difficult. I drive past several such every day.

The main pain is the consumption rate and having to fill up more often and stash more jerry cans in the shed.

Yeah, but in the US if you do this it's almost guaranteed you get the infamous black goo buildup in intake ports and E85 fuel stations while relatively common are nowhere near as readily available as E10 premium unleaded. E85 is also not regulated that well out here. Lots of places "E85" is actually as low as E50 in the winter to reduce cold start unburned fuel emissions. E85 especially doesn't do well with short trips, Mike Kojima at MotoIQ documented how his daughter's EJ25 running E85 experienced stuck rings from being driven short distances and the crankcase was filled with a thin layer of condensation + oil emulsion as well despite very aggressive oil change intervals.

3 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Which part of this sounds like the wrong thing to do?

I'd say, almost all of it.

Not wrong, but if I expected to not drive the car for a while but do a fair amount of garage shuffling I wouldn't run E85. Flashing a tune every time that happens sounds like a headache compared to a single map + flex fuel sensor.

1 hour ago, joshuaho96 said:

Not wrong, but if I expected to not drive the car for a while but do a fair amount of garage shuffling I wouldn't run E85. Flashing a tune every time that happens sounds like a headache compared to a single map + flex fuel sensor.

It would be harder to drop the tank of fuel, then plug in a cable and hit "load tune".

The difference is, the change you are saying you'd do only removes the easiest part of the whole operation...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...