Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

when u find ur self paying for mods on the gf's import that u convinced her to buy because urs was off getting work done to it just so u could be modifying something....

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You automatically subtract either 10 or 12MHz from FM station's call ID's.

You believe the collective noun for HSV owners is "A pack of arseholes"

You don't smoke, but if you did your brand would be Mild Sevens.

When asked to name your favourite author, the only people you could think of were Ben Ellis & Martin Donnon.

You know what Calsonic actually do.

Your benchmark for the latest Monaro is still the DR30 Skyline.

You only recently discovered Allan Moffat drove for Ford as well.

"Needs more dish" is your opinion of most rims.

You are confused when company slogans actually make sense.

The major cost in your monthly budget is for having defect notices removed.

You think The Fast & the Furious is a good movie.

You queued to see the sequel.

You support Brad Jones because he once drove at Bathurst in a Starion..

AND clocked the fastest MPH down Conrod (before the Chase)in the Starion and come inside the top ten placings at Bathurst against V8's four or five times and once nearly on the podium.

And he gave me lots of great advice on getting the Starion up to 160RwKw back in the good old days.

And you have had one in the garage awaiting the new head and EFI mods ever since you bought the Skyline seven years ago.

And when the Skyline ever gets back on the road you will fix up the Starion to go to Bathurst to pay homage to Brad when Turbo Touring cars make a comeback and he kicks ass in a Mits AWD V8TT Magna!

Sorry... got carried away.. :bs!:

you cry like a little girl when-

your mate confuse's your EVO for a GLI

a bird craps on your car

you hit a pot hole

DEFECTS

you pay your insurence

you are beaten off the lights by a holden

you can decifer the number plates , NIL8U , H8BMPZ , I8A4RE

you know what 250 kph feels like

you can fit your arm down your zaust pipe

you talk about your love/hate for neons & stickers when someone asks if you like rice and they look at you like a freak ( personal experience )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...