Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK, help me out with a history lesson!

I'd like to collect details of the Aussie delivered Skylines thru to R31....dates, names, engines and some pics.

I'll sticky this up once we have the info!

So, those who have been around long enough to remember, start posting!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52196-aussie-skyline-history/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Year :73-77

Model designation: C110

Engine : L24

Engine type : SOHC L6

Engine capacity : 2393cc

Ignition : points

Body type : sedan and hardtop

stovetop lights? : yes

Year :1977-1982

Model designation : C210

Engine : L24

Engine type : SOHC L6

Engine capacity : 2393cc

Ignition : points/electronic in 81-82

Body type : sedan and hardtop

stovetop lights : not in aus......only japan

First (PRINCE) SKYLINES in Australia, mid 1964, were (S50) 4 cylinder 1500cc four doors.

~Sept 1965 the first four door two litre six cylinder (S54Be2, later was the Be3, "e" meant export model) triple webered PRINCE SKYLINE 2000 GT-B's came off the boat from Japan.At this time Australia was the only country the SKYLINE was officially exported to.

Skylines continued to be imported from 1965 to 1968('67 models). 1966 saw the absorbing of Prince Motor Company by Nissan Motors, and Skylines although still built by the same people, were now Nissan Prince Skyline GT's ("A" model single carby, or "B" model with three DCOE 18 40mm Webers) There were a quite a few more differences!

Badging varied from 2000 GT to NISSAN PRINCE A200 GT.

With 3 webers;

2 litre 6 cylinder (G7) 127bhp @ 5600 rpm

123ft/lbs torque @ 4400 rpm

With single Nikki downdraught;

106 bhp and ?? for the rest!

No 1968 model Skylines for Australia. Nothing 'till ~May 1973 when we got the C110, AKA the Datsun 240K.

Second white car is a Prince Motor Company built S54b2

RED car is a NISSAN built S54Be3.

Engine is the G7 "B" version.

Jim.

1982 is where the r30 began....you would have to ask the guys in the r30 thread about that one.

have a look in my gallery...its chockers of c210/c211 pix

EDIT: Also check out my thread "c210/c211 skylines" for full history of this model

i don't know if this will help as the r30 was produced in OZ as well as imported in small numbers?

the MR30 was the australian version, HR and DR were the japanese made sports versions produced in both 2 and 4 door examples, 81/82 the HR was built as an entry level sports car basic turbo inline sohc 6 cylinder producing around the 150-160bhp with a weight of around the 1150kg mark for the 2 door and only slightly more weighty in the 4 door, this car was raced both in japan, the USA and here in australia with "gibson motor sport" being the main surrporter of the skyline here in OZ, in the US Paul Newman took a liking to the car and raced it with much success there, this in turn lead to Nissan japan producing a limited # of "Paul Newman" HR30 skylines both in the 2 and very rear 4 door versions, still running the inline 6 but it produced around 170-180bhp. i don't know what year production of the HR stopped as in 1982 Nissan began production of the DR30....

the first of the DR range i believe was a N/A fj20de powered car about 160bhp, the car itself had quite a few differences to the HR, it had all the "mod cons" radio, a/c, power windows and central locking which in turn made the DR about 100kg heavier than the HR, this trend seemed to follow in the next versions of the DR as well. the RS DR30 was a step up from the N/A version as it was powered by the fj20det at around 180-190bhp not to many changes other than the turbo and a brake upgrade though, some may have had a factor sun roof? then in 83/84 Nissan went that extra step forward and revamped the DR30 skyline into something that will turn heads even today.. the RS-X DR30, for starters the intercooled fj20det produced 205bhp and was the most powerful production car produced by Nissan, the look of the car was changed to a more aggressive looking no grill smaller headlights sharper front profile, "tekemon" or "iron mask" was what it was refered to by locals. all of these models have made there way over to australia at some point and are still being shipped today...

they were the beginning of what is now refered to as the "wedge shape" skyline, 6th generation skyline.....

Most of the info you're after can probably be found here:

http://homepages.tig.com.au/~robs/kevspage.htm

Check out the Skygline history section:

http://homepages.tig.com.au/~robs/kevspage4.htm

;)

i find it odd that the hr30 was built in 81 and 82 but the c210 was still in production in 82...

not saying that anyone is wrong, cos i dont know who's right and who isn't

i find it odd that the hr30 was built in 81 and 82 but the c210 was still in production in 82...

not saying that anyone is wrong, cos i dont know who's right and who isn't

Yes there were overlaps in production.

Production of the 32 started in '89, however, 31's were still being manufactured in '90.

:D

C210/211's ceased production in early 81 and sales records show stayed on sale till August 81 and MR30's took over from September of that year.

I not certain that is entirely correct.......because I have taken parts from a c210 in the wreckers and the compliance plate said 82..i dont recall the month though.

It had rectangular headlights similar to mr30

I not certain that is entirely correct.......because I have taken parts from a c210 in the wreckers and the compliance plate said 82..i dont recall the month though.

It had rectangular headlights similar to mr30

Not that it particularly matters, but if you took parts off a C210 with compliance plate stamped year 82, it would in fact be an Aussie C211, BUT! to my knowledge, No Skylines were made in Australia with the exception of that BRICK they called an R31 4 dr sedan & wagon. C110, C210/211, M/H/DR30 all made in Japan, and either shipped here in parts for assembly, or whole, but I think if my memory serves me correctly, all Skylines were fully imported. Some 240K's were assembled here, 4 dr sedans etc, but coupes were imported, same as 180B SSS.

And, I have a friend that owns a VL Dunnydore, complied 3/89, but it certainly wasn't made after 86, as VN's were released in 88.

FWIW, the Iron-mask DR30 was released early in '83. The RS (X) Turbo was realeased in the 2nd 1/2 of '83 & the Turbo-C (intercooled) was Jan '84 onwards. The last DR30's were fitted with factory CDI.

The DR30 RS-X Turbo was the only flagship model Skyline to be ever fitted with a 4-cylinder. The C210 GT-EX turbo was the first mass-produced Japanese Turbocharged vehicle.

The C10 was the only model to be offered as a 4-door GT-R (KGC10), and then offered as a 2-door GT-R (KPGC10).

The KPGC110 GT-R was only for sold over a period of around 6-9 months in '73 due to the oil crisis.

Bear in mind that all this info is for Japanese domestic models only

Ben/ further to your imformation on early skylines. Did you know that the First twin cam Skyline was built in 1965 (FEB) Did you know that the first turbo was in fact 1970 L20 I had one and is still going in car. Also the KPGC110 (1973) was sold only for local market. Reason that was never exported was that the S20 motors were owned by NISMO (alias Prince motor sport division, under the banner of Nissan , with the same engineer that first built the PRINCE) The motors were leased to the purchaser of there GT-R200 vehicles. There is only 287 cars ever built and reported to be 75-79 Genuine cars still alive>Red park has the most publisized vehicle (number 43) I have a vehicle with the vin KPGC110 but is not a GT-R but a GT-X2000 lower spec. It was brought into Aust via Port Moresby N.G. There was 4 different models of the KPGC110. Also as there was 7 different models of the PGC10 A little of the info. RAY

FWIW, the Iron-mask DR30 was released early in '83. The RS (X) Turbo was realeased in the 2nd 1/2 of '83 & the Turbo-C (intercooled) was Jan '84 onwards. The last DR30's were fitted with factory CDI.

The DR30 RS-X Turbo was the only flagship model Skyline to be ever fitted with a 4-cylinder. The C210 GT-EX turbo was the first mass-produced Japanese Turbocharged vehicle.

The C10 was the only model to be offered as a 4-door GT-R (KGC10), and then offered as a 2-door GT-R (KPGC10).

The KPGC110 GT-R was only for sold over a period of around 6-9 months in '73 due to the oil crisis.

Bear in mind that all this info is for Japanese domestic models only

Me again/ More facts. One reason that the KPGC110 was never exported to Aust, and it was> In 1973-74 the Australian muscle cars were hitting the market. Nissan was going to bring a few GT-R into Aust, but because of the drama with the Government of the day the muscle cars were shelved. Nissan did not wish to ruffle feathers in Aust by bringing the GT-R in, That is with the S20 motor.As two well known racing identities wanted them to race. Those people did eventually get there wish with Godzilla a few years later. Going back a sentence/ The only place on record that a genuine GT-R was exported ,in 1974 was England,

My car even though it is vin correct, is typical of Nissan of that era. They produced more of the desired model than motors and therefor down graded them in mechanical specs. My car was exported to N.G as a GT-X with L20 motor and twin Hitachi. Similar to the L24 specs as in 240Z There were approximately 24 KHGC110 2 door brought into Aust. with the L20 motor,which is a stronger motor than the L24. These were not badged as Datsun GL, but Datsun GT.(not Skyline)If I new how to download photo's then I could do so with ALL the models from 1957. Including a two door in 1963 that never made it to manufacturing. Not due to cost but due to being to far out for the era. Designed by pinafarina as they had a hand in some of the early ALB1S series Prince.

Hears another for you all I just thought of. There was a station wagon built in 1974 on the 4 door khgc110 model

If some one can explain to me how to download and what is the maximum size then I will try. Also in my archives I have pencil sketchs of the KPGC110 and the R380-381 (Prince)

Enough for now Ray

Yerp i concour with what Ben said, its good to read about the early nissan's and skylines and info upto the DR30's and beyond...Good stuff guys im enjoying it :D :D
  • 4 weeks later...

Just a little note.....I have a copy of an Australian Wheels Magazine from the mid 70's with a small writeup about the 240K GL. It mentions they were badged as GL and not GT as insurance companies were not keen on insuring any vehicles badged as GT.

Hi Steve,

Well spotted! The 240K had a rocky start marketing wise in Australia. Dropped right in it during 1. Fuel Crisis and 2. Supercar hysteria. As Ray (Prince) pointed out Nissan had the GT-R on hand as well but didn't make it out of Japan officially due to "Servicing concerns of the S20". To mix metaphors we can look back with 20-20 hindsight and read between the lines, thats political lines of the time. Any hint of high performance was removed as cars of this type were seen to be anti-social, using too much precious resources in the way of fuel, too much horsepower getting into the hands of the inexperienced...that sort of thing, not the image Nissan wanted to align itself with, bustin' it's ball joints to get into the family car market.Don't forget the power of the insurance industry came into political play. So Nissan did a quick "240k GT? no no mate....itsa GL, lovely finish, smoove ride...OOH LOOK, a seagull!!(yoink!)see? not a GT badge in sight!!"

You will find evidence of a few early escapees with variations of 240 K GT, Datsun GT badging. More common in Europe.

Can you post a pic of your Wagon Steve? I think I may have a brochure hereabouts of a skyway?

Cheers,

Jim.

Year :86-91

Model designation: R31

Engine : RB30E

Engine type : SOHC I6

Engine capacity : 2962cc

Ignition : electronic

4 speed Jatco overdrive auto and 5 speed MF5 manual transmission

Body type : sedan, wagon and (import only I believe- coupe?)

stovetop lights? : 1988-1991, first series had 4 horizontal lights, 2 each side split with a plastic panel

Thanks for that. I've been a bit one eyed and not shown much interest in Skylines beyond the C110, but your post points out some interesting facts!

A bit of Tasmanian trivia for you, did you know the Tasmanian police force took delivery of some 'specially prepared NSV Silhouettes? Now I'm going to have to find that article too. It's here somewhere......honest, but if someone can come to my rescue with some info on these police cars I'm sure we would all be richer from the experience :hippy:

Cheers,

Jim.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...