Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

This made me laugh (twice)

how lucky can you be http://www.9news.com.au/world/2015/01/03/11/50/rocket-hits-family-watching-fireworks-from-balcony

and this one http://www.9news.com.au/national/2015/01/02/16/06/nsw-cyclists-dramatic-roadside-stack

yes I'm one of those people that dislike and or despise mamil cyclists

Edited by Sinista32

Cos i cant go 3 years without losing a point for something, so eventually i run out.

If you can, they reset your points.

Just wanted to clarify this one - you don't need to go the full 3 years without losing any points in order to get them back. Demerit points are applied (or deducted, technically) on the date of the infringement, and then 3 years after this date those points are returns to you. So as long as you don't accrue a TOTAL of 12 points (or 4, whatever licence you hold) in any 3 year period, you're fine.

So if I lose 6 points today, then another 2 points in June, I will have 4 points remaining until 14/01/2018 (assuming I don't lose any more between June and then). Comes 14/01/2018, I will have those 6 demerit points returned to my licence, leaving me with 10 points until June 2018, at which point the remaining 2 will be returned also.

I'm sure everyone knows this already, but I just thought I'd clarify a bit more :P

Just wanted to clarify this one - you don't need to go the full 3 years without losing any points in order to get them back. Demerit points are applied (or deducted, technically) on the date of the infringement, and then 3 years after this date those points are returns to you. So as long as you don't accrue a TOTAL of 12 points (or 4, whatever licence you hold) in any 3 year period, you're fine.

So if I lose 6 points today, then another 2 points in June, I will have 4 points remaining until 14/01/2018 (assuming I don't lose any more between June and then). Comes 14/01/2018, I will have those 6 demerit points returned to my licence, leaving me with 10 points until June 2018, at which point the remaining 2 will be returned also.

I'm sure everyone knows this already, but I just thought I'd clarify a bit more :P

No, your wrong.

I wish it was like you say, but it isnt.

Source, please? I've been advised by multiple RTA employees on more than one occasion, and have clarified it with them to be sure.

It most certainly ISN'T "3 years with NO loss of points", which is what you're suggesting.

For ACT:

http://www.rego.act.gov.au/infringements/demerit-points

12 or more points within a 3 year period.

Technically I was wrong in that you don't start with 12 points to lose, but you start with 0 and accumulate them until you reach 12 within ant given 3 year period. My explanation above is still correct for the purpose of this discussion.

Well if you incurred LESS than 12 points within the 3 year period beginning from the date of the first offence, then yes. You have been treated unfairly. Unless your loss of licence wasn't directly due to accruing 12 points within 3 years, and was the ruling of someone with the power to revoke it.

End of the line is that as of whatever date the information in the link above was published, I'm correct (with regards to ACT licencing at least).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...