Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Dont you know JimiH?? They need to raise more funds the the Police Xmas party :D

Im all for girl power n girls in power n such ...... but her and Alannah McTiernan have no idea :)

hahhaa nice one Bully, i just sent her a nice long email :D

bet she doesnt even read it the stupid cow!!!

I sent one about the anti-hoon laws a while ago, it took her 2 months to reply :rofl: must have been busy making more new laws.....

I don't read the things about where the camera are in the paper and on the news (would most likely forget where they are anyway), but it still isn't a good move.

hey paul... hows about manufacturing a few of those puppies yeah

yeah not a worry.. the other option is to attach it to a electric pully system. flick a switch numberplate goes up, turn off numberplate goes down... james bond style

you guys are headed for what we have in Vic.

The cops are not driven by the law, and upholding it.

they are driving by revenue and even lying to give you a fine... then it goes to court... and you loose as its 2 cops word against yours.

you should all oppose it as we have it bad here with fines.

$480mil last year revenue...

the Vic cops then try say that 3km/h tolerance for speed camera's is too save lives.

The road toll is higher than last year when it was a 10km/h tolerance

yup they say this is all to save lives but we all know that the truth is the multis just aint bringing in enuf fold no more

an the death toll jus keeps goin up f%$k multis put more well trained inteligent (sAfrican American, sAfrican American) cops on the road instead

oh an just a hint if you dont want to get done for speeding do it on some little residential street where you might hit a kid cause your garanteed these fund raisers aint never gunna be set up in low traffic areas even if that is where speeding is most likely to cost lives (stupid make money over save lives policies)

:rofl::D:rofl::rofl::rofl::rant::rant::rant::rant::rant::rant:

the Vic cops then try say that 3km/h tolerance for speed camera's is too save lives.

The road toll is higher than last year when it was a 10km/h tolerance

i heard a long while ago that some countries or states in the world done away with camera's and found it make no difference in the road toll.

i think NZ's camera's flash everyone, but they only fine the top 10 or 15% of speeders, so if you drift over the limit or what not else you are safe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...