Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Benm,

 

So the R33 N/A ~150kw will crack 250km/h.. :D

 

I don't think it would. :P

I am unsure about the N/A but I can assure you that a 250hp (186rwkw) RB25DET is very capable of pulling 250km/h (and still pulling beyond that altho quickly running out of rpm before the rev limiter).

Lets just say I have a friend that has a flat private driveway to his house/property with plenty of run-off room where hitting 250+ in an RB25DET is very achievable.

Benm,

So the R33 N/A ~150kw will crack 250km/h.. :D

I don't think it would. :P

well I know I also took a stock pulsar over 200 with

pulsaroffdaclock.jpg

but I think things get much harder over 200, thats a lot of air to push out of the way.

A dyno can only tell you the wheel speed of the car at the rev limit in 5th, there is no way you can max out a standard car no matter how long the road

uh?

I agree with Bazelinez, the speedo and real world speed do tend to be out slightly. I know on the private road i use, my PFC reads 180 as my speedo nudges the little "HICAS" light off the end of my 180km/h stock speedo. at 200km/h on the PFC, the needle was just past the HICAS light. :P

well thats an interesting question.....personally I'm surprised a PowerFC would read different to a speedo since they both use the same sensor in the gearbox :confused: I think the main issue is the rolling diameter not being exactly right for the speedo

IMHO GPS or good accelerometers are the only accurate way

Benm,

I miss-understood you. :D

...and im saying you dont even need 250hp to crack 250km/h (and you dont even need 7,000+ rpm).

You then said your friend with a Rb25DET (which is 250hp) cracked 250km/h.

The N/A won't cut it. 250km/h is just too much air to push out the road.

This friends R33.. Was it dead stock? or had the usual exhaust?

How did it go towards around 235-250km/h. Torque would have been dropping off at that point so I would have to assume the last 10km/h were slowish.

Pulling hard is subjective.

Honestly, I really do find it hard to believe a stock R33 (including ride height) would zip up to 250km/h without a struggle, think it would really be pushed to get there.

But its all I think. :D

I believe 230km/h is a fairly easy target but after that things slow down quite a lot and takes quite a bit more time to get there.

Well if a little old corolla can do 8500rpm in 5th (3SGTE, but pretty much stock) then I think a skyline could do better.

BTW, working it back and allowing for the speedo being out, the rolla was doing anywhere from 270kmh+ (sits on about 2800rpm in 5th at 100kmh, but we know its more like 90kmh. So if anyone wants to do the maths)

I have some bits to add to this all done in safety offcourse. I have an apexi digital speedo for my r33 with some small mods to the car. At about 100 on the standard clock but the apexi is reading 105 and the gap increaces slightly the faster I go, but the top speed i have done in safe envronment was 260 on the apexi.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...