Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ohhhk I'm going to take back my last comment with regard to Haltech Platinum Pros.

This what my tuner (XSpeed) said about the Haltech Platinum Pro...

"Just don't."

I said "please explain" and he said....

It's a universal ecu that isn't tailored for any particular car with all sorts of tuning issues (cost the last guy $1700 in labour alone to get it working 80% of the time lol)

He went on to say that the measuring parameters of the Hally are far too wide to tune one specific street car effectively and would only really be superior if it was for a dedicated track car where normal reliability issues mean jack shit. He said they've tuned every ecu under the sun and the Haltech PP has returned reliability issues with cold starting, idling, hot starting and O2 sensor issues basically all the stuff you need to work 100% for a daily drive.

He seemed to think the AP Engineering Apexi PowerFC for the RB20DET was the beez neez. Easy to tune, designed to work with the rb20det specifically, excellent reliability.

James

Edited by plan-b

hey guys,

I have just been going through my pfc screens trying to find out whats going on with my o2 sensors and found out they were turned off.

I replaced the sensors and turned it back on but there is another setting (02 sensor reg).

Does this need to be turned on as well.

I have had a look through pfc manual and looks like it may be for the bncr32 and needs to be turned off, but not sure.

The car is a r33 gtr

ok, read whole 40 pages and found this

the 02 sensor as its a RB26 PFC will expect R32/R33 GTR style sensor as you have GTST it wont work correctly

youll either need to run without 02 feedback completely or change your 02 sensor to the GTR style 02 sensor

if you go for NGK BNR32 style 02 sensor you can set "02 registered" in function select to run in BNR32 mode

otherwise get a GTR33 sensor and leave 02 reg off but have 02 feedback on and it should be ok as long as you have the same GTR33 sensor

you can splice up the output from the 02 sensor and run it into both 02 sensor inputs on the RB26 loom to the PFC so both 02-1 and 02-2 have the same value

answer found

thanks for the reply , i am going through all the wiring, making sure everything as you say, i will let you know when i get success

the powerfc updates the tune in real time, and then when you key off, commits the changes to NVRAM

in the powerfc FAQ there is a section on this exact issue, search in the FAQ for "ECCS" and youll find a section on how to correctly set it up

on your car, as youve done an engine swap, the ECU isn't given enough time when you power the key off, so it doesnt get enough time to save to NVRAM, thus any change is blown away

the ECCS diagram shows you how it should be setup and how it needs to be wired in

Edited by Reecewashi
  • 1 month later...

I have a R32 gts-t that is running a Power FC, was tuned almost 2 years ago and haven't had any major problems since.

About a month ago I removed the throttle body to fix a coolant leak and ever since then I am getting a lot of idle hunting and sometimes when coming to a stop the car will stall.

This isn't consistent however, it is mostly ok when cold, but even when hot sometimes it isn't issue.

I have cleaned the AAC valve and have played with the TPS(as this is the only thing I can think of that would have been changed when I removed the TB) which currently sits at 0.4v on idle and doesn't move around.

Any suggestions for settings on the PowerFC I can play with to settle this?

Edited by Kwyjibo

there arent any other than DATA INIT to perform self idle

i can only suggest key to ON but dont start car

check TPS is 0.30ish at idle or adjust to make sure its around 0.30v and floor it and it should peak near 4v

the nissans service manual has what value it sould be at idle as i dont think it should be spot on 0.30v so best to check it

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

A friend of mine just recently imported a modded R32 from Japan. Its got some extensive mods and looks like it could put out about 400awkw once tuned...

Unfortunately the ECU was replaced and a stock one is in the car now. Just wondering - is the PFC the best option that's not going to cost an arm and leg?

Other options explored was Motec (too expensive) Haltech (not sure), Link ECU (again dont know anything about them) Nistune, etc...

If there are any con's with the power fc, what will it be?

any feedback much appreciated!

Edited by ironpaw

go read the powerfc faq, it has everything covered already

no known issues with using a powerfc on that car

ask who ever is going to tune it what ECU they prefer

no point going to someone who only tunes vipec's with a powerfc and vice versa

  • 2 weeks later...

hi guys,

got an issue with my pfc. its at the tuners at the moment and he cant get it to rev past about 6100rpm. he said he has all the different rev limit settings set at 8k and he also swapped the pfc out for the stock computer and then the car revved fine so obviously somethings going wrong with the pfc.

any ideas?

pete at jaustech. he said hes spoken to a few people about it and no-one has a clue why its doing it. rekon it might be a faulty pfc.

hes sent an email and is waiting to hear back from apexi about it

i assume so. he said hes saved the map so if i did have to get another pfc he could load it straight on.

thanks for the offer steve, ill wait to he back from him again about it anyway.

  • 1 month later...

did a search but cant find any thing, im thinking about getting a map sensor to hook up to display boost and peak hold on the hand controller, just wondering if it is possible to hook up a solenoid for boost control, if so any idea's what wires go to the solenoid?

normally its sold in a kit as the PFC boost kit

i have the solenoid i cant remember if i have 100% of the wiring but i don't have the map sensor, was all bought 2nd hand

i since bought a AVCR for electronic boost control

Yeah I know, but all I wanted was the map sensor to display boost, with the wiring you cab get that for $50+pp from the states, then I started wondering if I could hook up my current boost controller solenoid to it and have it work, the solenoid may not work but if know what wire to hook up to it then its worth a try

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...