Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wow, Initial D is right.... I thought it was just a cartoon. :confused: :(.

hah i must say im a initial d fan takumi is my hero haha na but really love watching the cartoon.

i dont reckon im co ordinated enough to brake with left while my right is just sitting there i wouldnt be able to do it i dont think. i spose ive never tried plus my cars manual and ive always used my right foot

theres not really much point using 2 feet, unless you need to stall it up for a quick take off...

I wouldnt get into the habit of left foot braking cos when u switch to manual u'll poo it up

ur mate sounds like a ricer if he thinks its gonna make a big difference

someone mentioned emergency braking and putting down both feet was dangerous etc, but i know when driving a manual and say a cat darts out in front my me i tend to brake+clutch at the same time for that split second.. if someone is left foot braking what would happen if they have the same habit as me and brake+accel? that wouldnt be too good..

im a right foot braker, even in autos, even when parking (autos usually roll forward themsevles quick enough for parking even without acceleration.. whats yer hurry !? :))..

shaun.

it would be more dangerous.................you wouldnt need it in day to day driving, it's a bad habit...........you dont really need to go 0.01sec faster then the other guy at the lights.

the first time i hopped into a car to drive i put the left foot on the brake out of habit from playing to much Datoyna USA.

if you took up rally or something though thats a different story.......

ive been left foot brakin since i was 17 cause i used to drive an XF and idle was really shitty so  i had to do it to keep the revs up.  havent stopped since especially now that i drive manual cause my left foot needs to be doing something.  im quite proud that i can brake smoothly with my left foot but ii find it bloody unco braking with the right foot driving an auto which is wierd cause thats what you noramally do in a manual anyways....strange.

ah yes its a dying art that only few of us ever practiced :)

As well left foot braking is almost mandatory to go fast in a rally car. It's a skill. Greg is just too old to get rid of bad habits :)
I certainly use it in competition to stabilise the car through corners. But I thought this thread was about driving around town - that's why I made the comment I did.

Anyone who uses the "it gives me a poofteenth of a second reaction time advantage" excuse is STILL driving too close to the car in front, and isn't reading the traffic correctly.

Little bit scared of people who use left foot braking in a manual.. What the hell is controlling the clutch?

When it really comes down to it, you dont need the clutch to change gears except in and out of first.

But I meant in corners where you do not have to change gears. Of course if you get it wrong and have to come to a complete halt you will stall every time. Motorkhana is a great example, as long as you don;t have to come to a complete halt you do not need the clutch foot at all.

And of course it makes a hge difference on the track if you are trying to deal with understeer, or are on a track with long sweeping corners

they way i look at it... manual cars allow u to use engine braking and gear selection to help balance the car when your cornering. in auto cars you loose this ability, gears can change mid corner and unload the chassy. i use left foot braking to negate this, but thats only if im driving in the hills for example (not speeding just making the car balanced through the corner)

in city driving, no point using left foot so i dont, and only brake with my right (if i happen to be driving an auto)

Little bit scared of people who use left foot braking in a manual.. What the hell is controlling the clutch? Or do you coast in "angel gear" (neautral)... Thats twice as dangerous as having +1 second reaction time IMHO.

Um your left foot is controlling the clutch! It is possible to shift without the clutch if necessary on the track of course doubt you would bother in everyday driving but sometimes it livens up an otherwise boring drive!!

No clutch for changing gears... hmmmm.... I m yet to practice that. I tried with limited success switching between 3rd and 4th and it seemed pretty hard.

its easy if you time it right, not sure if this has been mentioned allready but you can downshift without the clutch aswell as upshifting, its a bit harder tho, you really have to know the correct rpm your trying to change to for that gear and speed

its easy if you time it right, not sure if this has been mentioned allready but you can downshift without the clutch aswell as upshifting, its a bit harder tho, you really have to know the correct rpm your trying to change to for that gear and speed

Well it's the upshifting that I can't get right. I've been double-clutching all my manual driving life, so i can do the no clutch downshift alright-ish. Now that I am thinking about it... by the same token when upshifting, you need to take it out of the lower gear, wait for the engine to come down to the correct rpm for the higher gear and stick it in... Might try that "at home".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...