Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

flutter doesnt come from the intercooler. flutter comes from the bov being too tight or not having one and the air goes back and hits the turbo blades and gets chopped. the intercooler will make it echo more but wont make the flutter noise by itself

i just recently installed as 600x76x300 intercooler on ma car yesterday i took it out for a test spin everything goes fine but how come i dont get a flutter noise i hear wen other people put on intercoolers ?

Just block the black hose that run from your BOV back into the intake ( not the tiny vacum one ) then it'll give you heaps of flutter.

Only flutter I've heard is on a VL that didn't have a BOV.

Wastegates are used to control boost on the exhaust side. And they don't flutter. If they are not redirected back in to the exhaust they are known as screamer pipes as that is what they do.. Scream!

Having no bov on a VL running no IC and std boost is fine. Once you begin to fit intercoolers and up the boost their is more air in the system which needs to be vented some where otherwise it will eventually cause damage from stalling the turbo when you lift off the throttle.

yea, i don't see why a wastegate would have anything to do with fluttering.

I think you need new tyres and maybe a new bodykit, neons too, that should do the trick (only kidding :) )

Aren't there some BOV's out there that actually do their job AND make a flutter noise (the release of air into atmosphere, not back pressure)?

Those are usually the adjustable type BOV's where the owner/workshop has tightened the BOV so that it will remain shut until higher boost is attained, therefore 'fluttering' at lower rev's and venting the air at higher revs.

just put a metal plate in the wastegate and take it 4 a drive and u will have flutter just open the two bolts and slide the metal in therefore blocking the air and making it return out the air filter

And the award for most insane post of the year goes too...... :)

If you block the wastegate your turbo will have no boost limit, and bye bye turbo.

:spcartman

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...