Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Been a while since i jump on this forum, quite busy lately with

work... now that I'm shopping around for PFC tuning cost

around Melb... got a question...

Has anyone here got their PFC tuned by Chasers before?

Either by Benny or whoever else who works there...

Preferrably input from those RB owners.... but any other

car PFC result is welcome...

Thank.s

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72350-chasers-tuning/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok, everyone has their favourite tuner.:D ... and lol everyones tuner is the best:)

The past 2 months, my car on its current tune, with between 15psi and 18psi on a completely std internal engine has done Sprints at Phillip Island, Sandown and Winton, its done a night at the drags, a day at the drifts at Calder and the engine, tune hasnt missed a beat. And its done a hell of a lot of driving with work since they now know its back on the road proper:(

And Sandown was a 36 degree morning where i was running 18psi and 234rwkws...no pinging, car ran STRONG:) Then it rained so the poor engine was having to put up with big rev spikes with wheelspin as its hero driver was trying to punt it in the wet:whackit:

And on the way to Dimboola and back on the weekend was at 440kms when i stopped at Horsham on the way back for fuel, as i wasnt sure if id make Ballarat. So highway driving id get over 500kms per tank, city it gets to about 400kms before the light comes on.:)

They are the reasons why id be going to Racepace, other may be good, but im comfortable when im at the track and temps start climbing the tune is nice and flexible and can handle hot ambient temps and 103 deg C water temps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72350-chasers-tuning/#findComment-1331102
Share on other sites

...

im comfortable when im at the track and temps start climbing the tune is nice and flexible and can handle hot ambient temps and 103 deg C water temps

103 degrees... pft soft mate.

I agree with Roy - I had my GTR tuned at Racepace and the car doesn't ping, is efficent (as far as it can be) and stood up well at Sandown on the same day as Roy went out... my issues were unrelated to the tune, rather the hot weather and poor cooling.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72350-chasers-tuning/#findComment-1331123
Share on other sites

i had mine tuned at chasers. $350. the tune was ok i guess, made a bit more power. massive knock in top of 3rd 4th 5th. over 100 a lot of the times. they dont have a dyno (working yet) so they cant tune it, they just take it to protek to get it tuned and let them do the work. they also lost me keys (no big drama). i had to take it to ice peformance after that to get the knock fixed and have a retune

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72350-chasers-tuning/#findComment-1331401
Share on other sites

What's the problem?

in all honesty i do not know thats y i'm taking it there. Whenever the car creeps above .5 bar it spits and bubbles like crazy. I am guessing too wide a gap sparkies or coil packs. or knock sensor or something, hopefully not too serious. I'm praying its not too serious.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72350-chasers-tuning/#findComment-1331661
Share on other sites

i had mine tuned at chasers. $350. the tune was ok i guess, made a bit more power. massive knock in top of 3rd 4th 5th. over 100 a lot of the times. they dont have a dyno (working yet) so they cant tune it, they just take it to protek to get it tuned and let them do the work. they also lost me keys (no big drama). i had to take it to ice peformance after that to get the knock fixed and have a retune

That was when Dom from Pro-Tek tuned there cars, they are now all tuned by Paul from Motec

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72350-chasers-tuning/#findComment-1331663
Share on other sites

It's not about how much time you have, it's about how much dedication you have.  Ice worked on my car till 5am on Sat morning and moved the car in at 8:30 in the morning.

And look at the results.

That is dedication...

Sorry to say david they dont put that much effort into everyones car like they do to yours...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/72350-chasers-tuning/#findComment-1331883
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...