Jump to content
SAU Community

  

311 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well ye, i want one with low k's and if u get a late model supra there r some minor changes with aesthetics. Also knowing u have a 97 RZ instead of a 93 is a good feeling.

the later models also have bigger brakes I think.. Supra for the win. Around the same weight as the skyline, with MUCH better tuning potential.

Pfft Supra's starting to look dated.. Who cares? 34's will look dated in 3 years. And probably hold their value worse than the Supra.

the later models also have bigger brakes I think..

ye they did come with the larger brakes though it was only the RZ's (Late model RZ-S still had standard 2 pot brakes) RZ's also came with recaro steats, REAS suspension and some other minor things

my N/A supra goes just has hard as my GT-T, supras are more suited as a weekend car as the r34 a better choice as a daily driven car.

i also have a NA supra (see my gallery) and they will beat most NA cars along with some turbo's and V8's

I hate you so much.

"Hey guys, should I buy an R34 GTT or a Supra RZ? Also, I've discovered my girlfriend is bi and wants to bring her model friends over every night for a threesome, foursome and even fivesomes, my wallet is too small for $100 notes, and I can't seem to find underpants capable of holding my collosal man tackle in."

And here I am sitting looking forlornly at both, thinking to myself........ someday it will be mine, and here you go, having to choose between two of the most desirable cars in the market.

I am jack's burning jealousy.

After all that, I'd still pick the skyline. They're both awesome cars, but I just like the lines and 'feel' of the skyline over the supra, but hey, that's just me.

Just realised this is an old thread. Oh well, have to get my count up anyway.

Stuff that! GTR with a 2jz-gte would be my ultimate ride!

hell yeah. has anyone attempted this yet/thought about it? but for the sake of this pole, supra any day of the week. bolt on big turbo, add lots of fuel and tune it properly, easiest 600hp+ ur ever gonna see. where is the common 'limit' of GT-R internals? i know the pole is for GT-t's, but im feeling generous here, so i'll let the skyline boys use the GT-R for this one

SHUTUPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP......id pick a 34 NE day.....(i had the choice between the 2 and i went for the 34gtt)

my only reason......was because compared to r34s....there are to many supras on the road....same reason i didnt get a 33 GTR even though its a GTR its still a 33 (gets rdy for the flames) LOL

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...