Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Do a search my friend there was a thread not long ago comapring the series one to series two R34's. Off the top of my head the R34 came out in 1998 and the series 2 came out in late 2000??? someone please correct me if im wrong.

The major differences between a GTT and GTR are 4WD bigger engine, extra turbo etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77626-34-gtt-specs/#findComment-1418935
Share on other sites

Series 1 came out in May/April '98 - The series 2 in Aug 2000

The difference's are mainly cosmetic (new front bar, darker wheels and GTR coloured interior) although the S2 has a little extra torque.

GTR wing - Adjustable and a little taller

GTT wing - Non adjustable sits lower with different tip design.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77626-34-gtt-specs/#findComment-1421803
Share on other sites

Hello All,

I have the same question as well. I am in the process of buying a GT-t from Japan (hopefully 2000 Series I or II) and have had some mixed responses from people when I have asked them how the car drives.

Haven taken one for a test drive I can say with some confidence that the acceleration of a GT-t is very similar to that of the old 185kW 5-litre V8's that Holden used to use before the 5.7-litre came along.

It does tend to come on boost a little later when compared to the R33 GTs but this is something you can get used to by either using the gearbox a little more intelligently or buying a good AM boost controller.

All in all its a good little car with exceptional value for money when you compare it to anything that is vaguely equivilant on the Australian market.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77626-34-gtt-specs/#findComment-1425553
Share on other sites

Umm i find that my stock R34 GT-t eats even brand new SS commodores. So i don't know how you'd think the old aussie made v8 is comparable to the rb25det neo engine. With the boost thing it's not bad really theres plenty of torque down low compared to the old non neo engines found in the r33's. So yeah. The comment about the power being like the old 5 litre engine though has left me dazzled.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77626-34-gtt-specs/#findComment-1426860
Share on other sites

Had mine for a year. Absolutely love it and very reliable. Used as a daily driver that sees about 50km a day. Basic mods and making ~200rwkw which I think is plenty for a daily driver. Haven't had a chance to run down the strip yet, but would like to soon.

Have only had some very minor issues and car has cost me less to run than my old liberty that liked to split cv boot seals every few months.

Minor issues so far:

*Blown park lights - Who cares when the replacement globes cost $1

* Climate control not working - Internal sensor was disconnected when stereo was fitted. Easy fix.

*Transmission went into safety cut out mode once - Not sure what caused this but it hasn't happened since.

For a manual like you specified you could pay anywhere from high 20s upto almost 40 depending on condition and mods. If you searched around you could probably find a very nice example in the lower range of that bracket.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77626-34-gtt-specs/#findComment-1427255
Share on other sites

thanx for the replies guys...

whats the diff between s1 and s2 and is it worth searching for one and paying more money? coz theres a few things differnt between s1 and s2 n r33 gtst's so i just wanan know if its worth it...

also has ne1 broken into the 11second 1/4 mile in there GTT and if so what mods were used???

are 34 gtt's heavier then 33 gtst if so by how much ?

thanx again everyone for there help...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77626-34-gtt-specs/#findComment-1428197
Share on other sites

Yeah that english.auto Website is pretty handy for a general guide to the auction prices. It even has some stats based on prices for diff colour choices etc....

But generally how much you pay is directly related to how many km a car has done. i.e. >80,000km and you are guaranteed a bargain

These two sites are archived from Nissan in Japan and are pretty interesting despite the crappy translation;

Series 1: May '98-August '00

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=e...YLINE/R34/9805/

Series 2: August '00 on

http://translate.google.com/translate?

hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://history.nissan.co.jp/SKYLINE/R34/0008/:)/http://translate.google.com/transla...YLINE/R34/0008/

Good luck! Think i'm going with the Series 2, only because I want a newer car. There seems to be minimal difference between the two;

Except front bumper, badge location, front grille to name a few.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77626-34-gtt-specs/#findComment-1428892
Share on other sites

Sure are rare! This is the only other one I've ever seen:

http://www.prestigemotorsport.com.au/au/st...sp?StockID=2880

which sold for around $37k + tyres, rego and stamp duty

Yeah series 2 front bars aren't as sweet as S1's

That's why i went for the Nismo Aero front bar...looks a lot tougher

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/77626-34-gtt-specs/#findComment-1433047
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To plug the hole. The engine plant may not have known whether the car it was going into had a gauge or not. It was a long time ago and the integrations might not have been fully modern. Or they might not have cared because the extra inventory and processes to save a few cents on the sender might have cost more anyway. But please tell me you are not still confusing the idea of a pressure gauge sender, and an oil pressure light switch. The switch will be out there. In a separate hole. Probably with only one wire running to it. Running the light.
    • Blower needs to go low on the exhaust side, displacing the AC and PS, which you have to decide whether you want to keep and how and where to relocate if you do. Electric option for PS is, at least, helpful. Sadly, there is no workable 12V electric AC of any value. Whilst the blower is the last compression step before the throttle, and so it might seem a good idea to have it near the inlet manifold (as mentioned above), you probably want it to go through an intercooler first, so, having it on the opposite side of the car facilitates that air flow path. The turbo discharges into the blower, so proximity of the turbo's compressor outlet to the blower's inlet is nice. But then you might want to intercool that too, before boosting it again....which would probably be a ball ache. Routing pipes out to the front and back could be a bit shit. If there was room for (at least) a small (but preferably larger) water to air core on that side, then that would probably be the best approach. I guess a reasonable alternative would be to locate the blower where the alternator is (more or less, associated with the inlet manifold, per Matt's thought), and somehow incorporate a water to air core into the manifold, sort of like they do for modern blown V8s. The big difference here though is that those V8s have only the one throttle (upstream the blower) and only the one compression step (the blower) and no need for too much in the way of bypass/blowoff valves. Whereas in a twin charged 6, you do need to think about one or two bypass valves associated with the 2 compressors and you would prefer to have the intercooling done before the air has to pass through the throttle. You'd like the throttle to work approx the same no matter what the compression is doing. But if it is located in hot air stream before a cooler, then sometimes the air will be real hot, sometimes it will be quite cool, and the throttle mapping/response will be quite different between those two cases. The throttle, if sized for hot air, would be too large for cold conditions. It's all a ball ache.
    • Package SC on exhaust side. Remote mount turbo. Still a fair bit of room when you get creative on the inlet side of the motor too. Especially if you can get really creative with the welding, and effectively build it into the bottom of the inlet manifold. Would definitely take some design work, and some trial and error, to make sure flow works well still! Might be easier to just start with the Nissan March though... All the work is already done for you...
    • I'll sit down and get a post together 馃榿
    • The factory oil pressure sender is no longer in the car that's what is confusing me. In the Taarks adapter I have an aftermarket Bosch style pressure/temp sender and the factory temp sender only. Oil pressure is perfect. Where does the factory oil temp sender go to if there were never any gauges? Why was it there from the factory?
  • Create New...