Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The OSG sequential is meant to be the strongest of the bunch rated at 1500hp, but its a relatively "new" product so theres not many good/bad stories about it yet. The hollinger is a nice box, but a few rumors I hear of having a very low service life and they can and do break on high hp cars. Hollinger also do not make a H pattern box anymore, only sequential.

A friend of mine is running an OSG sequential and it was chosen over all the above mentioned boxes, as it "looked" the strongest and was rated for the highest hp out of all of them (and the workshop that built the car have seen some Hollinger failures and reccomended the OSG... very big workship in Sydney btw :)). The car is very fresh, ill see if he can post in here once he gets some good use out of it.

Why dont you tell us what hp you are running, then im sure some people can make some better suggestions. Youve already said the Hollinger is out of your price bracket (20,000 plus), and buy the time you grab a brand new Trust H pattern with the uprated input shafts and postage etc, youre going to be coming damn close to the price of the OSG box from Otomoto. If youre running 650hp and under, id suggest talk to PPG (Pfitzner) and get one of their dog sets and uprated shafts.

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok, stupid question 101:  does the OS G gearset simply fit in the existing GT-R gearbox case?

Cheers,

Lucien.

Basically...

But why are these gearboxes braking? Just because you can do clutchless gear changes doenst mean you can do flat changes without an ECu momentarily cuting ignition?????

Does it come down to a certain extent that ppl dont shift correctly...which brings me to the question. :D

Does anyone actually have any 1st hand experience with these boxes and how you are meant to shift with them?

Gentlemen,

i will be running around 850 hp at crank. RB30 bottom end and 26 head with extensive mods to both, Innovative turbo etc etc..

The chap with Purple 32 and a dog box for sale has already contacted me and we are still talking.

Mashrock i contacted you 3 weeks ago about your box but you replied that it was not for sale at the time.

Now you guys will all hate me for this but i am staryting to lean towards some engineering fabriction time and putting a bullet proof tricked up 2 speed behind it and maintain the 4wd aspect.

It appears that it costs alot for gearbox's that still BREAK, i only want for strip not track.

If you still talking to me , any one with experience here?

I saw Mick featured in ZOOM mag with a two speed, any one know how i can get hold of him for advice.

Still not sure exactly what direction to go in. Simply looking for bullet proof performance.

I know this box isn't in the same league but has anyone seen a 6 speed getrag break as was talk to the tuner of markr34gtr cars and his opinion was they were a pretty good box there not running it now in the 9sec drag car but they used and abused it for sometime with no problems. It just i'm considering going this way as my requirement arn't at suggest a high hp level and it seems the getrag is strong than the std 5 speed.

pete

ps anyone wants to unload a getrag let me know cheers

pnblight:  You mean the one that's in the R34 GT-R?  I fairly sure Troy (ylwgtr2) managed to mangle his.

Lucien.

yes i believe they ran the r34 pretty hard for awhile then got to a point where they transferred the motor to the r32 as they didnt want to cut a r34 gtr vspec to go drag racing. And do you know what broke in the getrag etc and at what hp level he was running.

cheers

pete

yes i believe they ran the r34 pretty hard for awhile then got to a point where they transferred the motor to the r32 as they didnt want to cut a r34 gtr vspec to go drag racing. And do you know what broke in the getrag etc and at what hp level he was running.

cheers

pete

I can't find the post anywhere, but I distinctly remember a post by Troy with pictures of the busted gears. Maybe PM him.

Lucien.

I have used the ppg dog box in my car for about the last 18 mounths and have had no problems at all.This box has been abused(me learning to drive it and drag raced) as well as a lot of street driving.I lent this box to a friend for a while and they ran a 10.6 second pass in it as well.I run 600rwhp and my friend ran 700rwhp he now also has brought a box and runs 799rwhp,neither of us has broken one or had any problems these boxes are great ,easy to drive on the street the only down side is they are a little loud.Parts are in stock here in Australia and they are very helpfull.Iwould recommend this box to anybody.Hope this helps.

the v161 getrag that the supra and the R34 GTR use is a steaming pile of poo...... 3rd gear especially.....there noisy and notchy...there fine when you get them into gear....but its getting them into gear thats the drama....they like to strip the synchro meshing teeth off the gears....nissan dont sell parts to rebuild these gearbox's but fortunatly toyoya do....ask snowman....he has broken his...twice

The 5 speed getrag in the 32/33 gtr is stronger than the 6 speed in the 34gtr. The best of the bunch is the 33 series 3 due to the larger syncros & hubs. If you're running a 34 its not just a case of throwing in the 32/33 box as the diff ratios are different.

I've heard of a few trust dog boxes destroyed at around 500rwkw but not OS Giken gear sets at this power level, bonus is they are still a heli cut gear set so street driving is more pleasurable.

PPG are rubbish

What is this comment based on? Anything to explain why you said this as i am sure everyone is curious why you are claiming them to be rubbish, i sure am.

I don't know anything about these gearboxes so i am just interested to find out like most other people here.

Also, about the ikeya shifters, i read in hpi i think that they are slower shifting and more awkard then the stock shifter, great idea but just seems they didn't get it 100% right.

Oh and not that it really means anything but I WIN is running a Pfitzner gearbox in his 33 GTR now, might be worth asking him how its handling the power. If you want to pm him his username on here is MR33.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • Yuh, but that one is NLA. There might be an equivalent, but I haven't looked.
    • If you hadn't bought a stand alone one already, nismo make a bolt on adjustable FPR https://www.efisolutions.com.au/nismo-fuel-pressure-regulator-sr-rb-s13-180sx-r32
    • I know and understand they are principally the same. They both cause lock under decel, but the 1.5 nomenclature implies "half" or less locking force, or it allows for more slip or a speed differential between both wheels. Right now the driving manners with the 2 way is pretty rough on transient to full off throttle in the backroads. In other words letting off the throttle too rough is not forgiving, great for drifting, tougher for controlled grip driving.      Yeah, I have watched that video a couple times, I am more so just looking for the confirmation that both part numbers offer the same ramp architecture and are just different settings from the factory.     38420-RSS15-B5  38420-RSS20-B5
×
×
  • Create New...