Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does any 1 want to share there Inj map so that I can have a quick gander at what they used as a target AFR's across the board?

Would I be correct in saying that every car would need a slightly different airflow curve?But for the most part the target afr or inj map would stay pretty much the same. For example my car is a neo RB3025 with a GT3576 and z32 AFM. it would have a different airflow requirements to a RB25 with a GT3576 and z32 AFM due to the extra capacity. But the fuel map would be quite similar.

I obviously did it the other way by using the standard airflow curve and tuning the inj map to compensate. So once I get the idea through my head of how it works, I might start slightly tweaking it via the airflow curve.

regards

Chris

Chris im pretty sure ive posted up a few in tuning threads before, the target afr map or target injection ms table is tweaked between different engines and turbos and obviuosly fuels, but yes in broader terms it is very similar.

If I send you my tune can you have a look at it and if possible make any suitable adjustments? I am happy to $ for your work if you believe you can make a difference. It seems sloppy in the lower range. If you are able to, PM me.

Sorry ive turned off pm's as i rarely get screen time nowadays. feel free to email it to me info@chequeredtuning.com with mods and car type. I wil look at it for you for free, as for changing it i will see how it looks first, and maybe make sugestions, do you have WB logging?

An easy way to see if your tune is pretty poor is the color grading in the map, if it doesnt smothly blend colours it needs work.

here are two examples the top one is a real map, see the large steps and troughs.... this is all bad for driveability etc. Compare the second map to the original to get an idea of what im getting at. (please understand the touched up one is dramtised a bit to make it more obvious). :P

post-34927-1257679069_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1257679085_thumb.jpg

The top map was tweaked to remove the steps and troughs only and this was the reply from that UK customer "Car Feels really good mate, never felt the car as powerful as that before and was only getting between 22-30 knock"

Smoothness is paramount for driveability

EDIT: found the thread, save these files as .DAT and you can compare the before and after to get the jist of my ramblings. (ignore the fuel map though as it was to dangerous to rewrite a UK based car with no WB, its cleaned up not rewritten to target afrs from memory)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/295349-can-somone-with-datalogit-check-my-map-please/page__p__4924793__hl__map+smooth__fromsearch__1#entry4924793

Sorry ive turned off pm's as i rarely get screen time nowadays. feel free to email it to me info@chequeredtuning.com with mods and car type. I wil look at it for you for free, as for changing it i will see how it looks first, and maybe make sugestions, do you have WB logging?

An easy way to see if your tune is pretty poor is the color grading in the map, if it doesnt smothly blend colours it needs work.

here are two examples the top one is a real map, see the large steps and troughs.... this is all bad for driveability etc. Compare the second map to the original to get an idea of what im getting at. (please understand the touched up one is dramtised a bit to make it more obvious). :P

post-34927-1257679069_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1257679085_thumb.jpg

The top map was tweaked to remove the steps and troughs only and this was the reply from that UK customer "Car Feels really good mate, never felt the car as powerful as that before and was only getting between 22-30 knock"

Smoothness is paramount for driveability

EDIT: found the thread, save these files as .DAT and you can compare the before and after to get the jist of my ramblings. (ignore the fuel map though as it was to dangerous to rewrite a UK based car with no WB, its cleaned up not rewritten to target afrs from memory)

http://www.skylinesa..._1#entry4924793

I downloaded the tune and had a quick squiz at it and it does look very uniform and tidy. I can see alot of work went into the AF table too. You have email!

Curious why everyone likes a totally ruler flat A/F...

I tend to richen up my tunes at maximum break torque when the cylinder temps are at their greatest

Also I don't see many people dial in a few more degrees once the torque decays pinch.gif

Curious why everyone likes a totally ruler flat A/F...

I tend to richen up my tunes at maximum break torque when the cylinder temps are at their greatest

Also I don't see many people dial in a few more degrees once the torque decays pinch.gif

Put simply you never give gold away for free.... and as such a mail order free touch up is no where near an in house dyno derived tune... as one needs to compensate for a myriad of things.

thats why i said (please understand the touched up one is dramatised a bit to make it more obvious) and (ignore the fuel map though as it was to dangerous to rewrite a UK based car with no WB, its cleaned up not rewritten to target afrs from memory)

but your post above is correct, most of our tunes dont have flat af curves and definately have a non linear timing line. Most go up, some go up down up... all the benefits of live tuning.

It seems these days the general consensus is ruler flat af on boost is a good tune.

I've seen many times people give only credit to af ratios that are ruler flat.

I must admit before I knew anything about tuning I thought the same.

We need a tuning sub forum!

It seems these days the general consensus is ruler flat af on boost is a good tune.

I've seen many times people give only credit to af ratios that are ruler flat.

I must admit before I knew anything about tuning I thought the same.

We need a tuning sub forum!

Hmmmm wait till you start tuning engines that can continuously move inlet cams or even both inlet and exhaust. Then add variable runner length and direct injection into the equation. You'll start to realize that you know very little about tuning.

I thought I knew tuning quiet well until I talked to a former gm calibration/ experimental combustion engineer.

Hmmmm wait till you start tuning engines that can continuously move inlet cams or even both inlet and exhaust. Then add variable runner length and direct injection into the equation. You'll start to realize that you know very little about tuning.

I thought I knew tuning quiet well until I talked to a former gm calibration/ experimental combustion engineer.

I would love to talk to the guy who tuned the Saab variable compression turbo engine.

Would hate to think what is involved there

Hey Trent, cheers for pointing me in the direction of that tune. It was very handy to compare how others have set it out.

I copied the fuel map to experiement with but I think I may have found another issue that I was over looking. When it's making full boost it doesn't seem to be richening up as much as it should be so I think the craptacular walbro fuel pump is running out of flow. But I'll confirm that soon but I hope not cos I really really don't wanna have to strip my stereo out to get access to it.

easiest way to check that is a fuel pressure gauge, any decent dyno will have a mechanical one handy.

if not, you can remove the fuel rail return at the tank return and run it into a bucket. If you get no fuel at max torque/boost, the pump is not up to scratch

Yeah true, thats exactly how I was gonna test it. like you said with a bucket and apply 20psi to the pressure reg with my air compressor. if nothing or only a little comes out I know theres some thing wrong.

That won't work bud.

Injectors need to be running etc

I do realize that there would a portion of fuel that would no be getting consumed by the motor. But what it would tell me is if the fuel pump is almost stalling at those pressures at the very least. unfortunatly I don't have a dyno in my shed, but good point on the remote fuel pressure gauge. That is something that I do have. sounds like a job for when I return from work in India with my nice new 260 poncams.

So I did a simple test by just setting the bottom 6x6 of the map to 9:1 from around 11.5 and it dropped the AFR's from 12.4 to about 11. So the fuel pump might just be ok. but will do a proper test later on.

I think I just needed to be more agressive with airflow curve above 3.5v

I got my wideband today. Just fiddling with it, my idle was around 11.3. I went to lean it out a little and in the FC Edit, I had to set my cell for that idle cell close to 17, almost 18 just to get the engine close to stoich... Why are they so far out?

What is a good idle afr? Does anyone have a target AFR for the whole board? I am thinking of retuning my whole injector map by resetting my tune, adjusting injector settings for my nismos, setting the afm to z32 and then copying my whole ignition map across and dropping ignition by a couple degrees then richening up the ignition table and start adjusting. Good or bad start?

its probly the same reason my target afr's were odd. set the cells on your injection map where the car idle's to 14.7. Then open the monitor screen and check the Airflow meter voltage at idle. Now once you know what the AFM voltage is go to tab 3 where you will see the airflow curve's. IF z32 is third AFM selection down then look down at curve 3 which is below it. now scroll across to the corresponding voltage that matchs to what your car does at idle. NOTE* My car idles with a AFM voltage between 1.18 and 1.2volts. now increase the value by a few points and update your pfc while logging with your wide band and keep doing this untill your target AFR is the same or very close to your actuale AFR.

IS that clear as mud?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you not seen geospy.ai? It can now give GPS co ords to within a metre from a photo, even if it's a random photo you take inside. Supposedly at the moment only the government/law enforcement has access to that... Supposedly...
    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
×
×
  • Create New...