Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

they can however it's better to remove them as the bolts that hold them in are pretty good as catching tyres if the car is low

also clearace is an issue... my tyres would hit the metal above on occasion so liners would have been destroyed anyway...

also it's a good idea to jimmy up something to hold the cables out of the way in the right front arch

this is true, Mine rubs the bolts occasionally coming in and out of driveways.

My thoughts too, but apparently not. While hard driving the lock seldom goes as far as while entering driveways. and the camber change is never that much on a road or track as it is coming up driveways.

Hey guys, Just had a quick read through this thread but couldn't really find anything about wheels for an r32 GTS-T coupe type M

- The guards aren't rolled or anything to my knowledge..

- I know nothing about offset/width and all that

I'm seeking advice on a nice sized wheel. I want 17" or might go 18"

The wheels on the car are ArchWheels.. So seedy they look like a spider web (bought with them on the car)

I have no idea what size they are, pretty sure they're 17's but the car is 110km away at my grandparents ready for a little makeover

So if you could give me some nice sizes with the specs etc.

Cheers Zane.

Anyone know the backspacing for standard r32 gtst wheels?

It looks like about 4 1/2 inches but im not sure.

Im liking these http://www.summitracing.com/parts/crr-3978912/overview/

But im looking at how very close the hicas knuckle is.

I know they are steel, but the only other ones i really like are about $4000 (gold fabulous racing)

Anyone have any experience with the follow size wheels on a R34 GTT?

F - 18*9+22 running 245//35//18 rubber

R - 18*10+30 with 265//35//18 rubber

I am looking at getting some wheels for my GTT, currently running stock suspensions (planning on lowering after I find the right wheels.)

I'm hoping for the wheels to sit as flush as possible with the guards. Would also like to avoid stretching rubber.

I'm prepared to roll guards when I lower the car, but I'm wondering if any further work would be required??

Cheers!

Anyone know if a 275 tyre would have a bludge or straight side wall with 9.5 inch rims. Any pics would be appreaciated

They sit straight on the rims! Look in my build thread somewhere and you will find a pic! Too lazy to go find it for you!

I am in the market for new rims for my r33 gts4 and have narrowed the selection down to two designs, work vs-xx or meister s1

in either 18x9 +15 or 18x9.5 +20, both sizes and offsets should fit ok but I'm not 100% sure.

easy.

Thoughts on this size?

Rota Grids (concave version)

18x10 +35 offset

with 235-40-R18 and 245-40-R18 tyres

With the old tape measure there will be a bit of poke on the front, but im more concerned with what it might

touch under the arches!?!

http://www.willtheyfit.com/index.php?width=215&aspect=55&diameter=16&wheelwidth=6.5&offset=40&width2=235&aspect2=40&diameter2=18&wheelwidth2=10&offset2=35&Submit=Submit

^with the 235 tyres for the front

Cheers guys!

18x10 +38 on the rear will be fine. Go 18x9 +30 on the front

Anyone have any experience with the follow size wheels on a R34 GTT?

F - 18*9+22 running 245//35//18 rubber

R - 18*10+30 with 265//35//18 rubber

I am looking at getting some wheels for my GTT, currently running stock suspensions (planning on lowering after I find the right wheels.)

I'm hoping for the wheels to sit as flush as possible with the guards. Would also like to avoid stretching rubber.

I'm prepared to roll guards when I lower the car, but I'm wondering if any further work would be required??

Cheers!

You need to look back a few pages, try to find my post and pictures.

Short answer: Perfect. Get coilovers and slam it. I would change rubber to 225/45 and 245/45 personally for more low.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...