Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think heaps of people run +22 all around with little tyre. Might want to check front clearance before you go putting money down.

Can't seem to find +22 on their website?? Only have +38, +35 and +18

Can't seem to find +22 on their website?? Only have +38, +35 and +18

Bugger. How much tyre/camber/low are you planning on running?

+18 would easily fit the rear but im not sure what needs to be done to fit the front. Probably bit of camber and little tyre?

edit: Seems someone has answered you on facebook. I think he is right, probably better off going a staggered setup.

Edited by dontyellpl0x

Yea got an answer for fitment on the rears, only problem is the only width Rota offers is 9.5 or 10's so can't go staggered fitment unless I get the normal Rota Grids but then I won't have the concave look the R's offer on the front.

Not planning on running any lower than it sits nowpost-34692-14078506335871_thumb.jpg

just run 9.5+18 all round

staggering is pointless and the front guards have heaps of room

will need to roll all 4 corners and remove the guard liners in the front.

front guards can literally be pulled to any spot they need to be and then moved back... just be sure to check front door and bonet clearance at the joins.

  • Like 2

Hi all , new to the forum thought id start somewhere ,just got a new set of wheels and tyres fitted and had an issue or two

Skyline model = R33 GTST S2
Wheel diameter = 19"
Wheel width = 8.5 , 9.5
Wheel offset = +25 Rear, not sure of front they but sit inside guards
Tyre size = 235x35 , 245x35
Modifications to fit = roll rear lips ,car at standard height atm fitting coilovers soon , rears look like they might need camber fix to lower it, fronts will need inners removed to lower. Rolling cost $70 a side ,nice job too no cracked paint yet :yucky: ...will post photos when i work out how to do it ..

with that offset and those tyres you should be fine (ultimately depending on how much you lower it though).

Otherwise the rears will naturally get more camber as you lower it so it will fix itself anyway.

TE37: 18x9 +20 all round, 245x40's on the front and 275x40's on the rear.

What issues/modifications will I encounter?

Car is HNR32 (GTS4 sedan).

I think you may have some clearance problems with the rear tires being that wide but I'm not 100% sure (may have to roll guards). Can anyone confirm?

Im guessing this is a track car given the wide tires?

Cheers

Skyline model = r34 GTT

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width =10"

Wheel offset = + 15

Tyre size = ?

Modifications to fit = ?

Will these rims be legal in WA as well ? I know with diameter you can go 2" higher or lower but what are the limits to width? Any help would be greatly appreciated :)

Skyline model = s2 r33
Wheel diameter = 17"
Wheel width =9"
Wheel offset = + 22 (or 25 cant remeber)
Tyre size = 235/40
Modifications to fit = none

Plenty of caliper clearance, no problems when turning. Will upload photo soon

Amir

Skyline model = r34 GTT

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width =10"

Wheel offset = + 15

Tyre size = ?

Modifications to fit = ?

Will these rims be legal in WA as well ? I know with diameter you can go 2" higher or lower but what are the limits to width? Any help would be greatly appreciated :)

no they wont be legal. 2 reasons

1st is they wont sit inside the guards.

2nd is that yes there is a limit to how much wider you can go from stock rim width and im sure a 10" rim is it. I remember checking one time if my 9.5 inch rims would be too wide and indeed they were. I think it is 1 inch wider or something boring like that. However you are unlikely to get any greif from this too much, the wheel outside the guard will be the one that gets you (as well as the high camber and stretched tyres to make it fit)

GL

I'm looking at getting some rims for my r33 gtst.

17x9+35

17x10+25

I'm not sure if they'll fit. Cars lowerd on tien coilovers. If they fit what tire sizes are people running with these sizes. It's a daily driver any info would be appreciated.

Skyline model = r34 GTT

Wheel diameter = 18"

Wheel width =10"

Wheel offset = + 15

Tyre size = ?

Modifications to fit = ?

Will these rims be legal in WA as well ? I know with diameter you can go 2" higher or lower but what are the limits to width? Any help would be greatly appreciated :)

Lol no

Skyline model = r33 gtst

Wheel diameter = 17

Wheel width =9 inch front 10 inch rear

Wheel offset = f +35 r +25

Tyre size = ?

Modifications to fit = ?

front will be fine with a 245 or something and maybe pushing the guards back a bit.

rears will be a bit of fun. its going to sit outside the guards so you will need to roll the rear arches, put camber on it and probably also run a 245.

I hope that is the look you are going for...

  • Like 1

Skyline model = r34 GTT
Wheel diameter = 18
Wheel width =9.5
Wheel offset =+20
Tyre size = 225/40 fronts, 245/45 rears
Modifications to fit = Guard roll all round, rears will be dropped down to 245/40 and camber arms installed

They are poking about 10mm fronts, less on rears as they are cambered in with natural lowering. Will get an alignment done and report back.

post-80854-0-86713300-1409679830_thumb.jpgpost-80854-0-88391800-1409679854_thumb.jpgpost-80854-0-53818600-1409679866_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...