Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking at getting wolf s1p will 18x10 + 35 fit rear? Otherwise this

Skyline model = r33 gtst

Wheel diameter = 18

Wheel width = 9

Wheel offset = +27

Tyre size = 235 40

Modifications to fit = ????

10+35 SHOULD fit rear, I had 10.5+30 and it fit no issues.

Other than that, the 9+27 would be near on perfect.

Looking for some ideas on what size tyre I should run on my new wheels? These are on a 33 gtst.

Current specs are: Front: 18x8.5+35 235/40 Rear: 18x9+35 265/35.

With my mildly rolled guards they fit easily 15-20mm inside the guards and I can fit my almost my whole hand in and around them in the guard and get pretty much no scrub at full lock or anything but I'm not sure if I kept the same tyre sizes it would clear everything easily and not scrub like all shit. My new wheels are 18x9+20 all round so a fair bit more agressive offset but nothing crazy. I don't want much stretch and would like the largest and most practical tyre sizes I can fit without more guard work. Any help is much appreciated! cheers.

18x9+20 with 245/40 all round :)

Rolled guards, front upper control arms to help tuck it in. Bit of scrubbing otherwise

post-109116-14188220710166_thumb.jpg

Edited by dontyellpl0x
  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

My R33 GTR on Work emotion D9r ... got them back in October on the 12th, just been lazy and havent up loaded anything.

Work Emotion D9R 18x10.5 +15

Federal RSR Semi slicks 265/35/r18

Hnngg.

Edited by sleptema
  • Like 1

Hey guys I'm looking at buying a set of enkei RPF01's for my r32 gtst, I'm just wondering wether 18x9.5 +15 fronts and 18x10.5 +15 rears would fit

Not a chance without work. Well, they'll fit... drivability is probably not great...

My 18x9.5 RPF1's all round on the BNR32 barely fit as width goes.

I can't remember if the GTST fronts are same but you'll need to run 245's if you want to not rub the guard liner.

You'd have 1inch sticking out at the rears with 10.5's, not even camber alone with get that back..

Lol this guy ^

What look do you want and how much work ate you prepared to do?

If you run 225 and 245 you will easily make it with camber and a big guard roll.

If you are going for something that will still grip then expect to pull guards a fair amount

Guard liners won't be an issue as they will have to be removed anyway

Hey can you guys help me out I have a 33 gtst and I'm looking to go different wheels, just wondering if I can 18" 8.5 +30 on the front and 18" 9.5 +38 on the back? Or should I just go same width front and rear, if so should I go 8.5 or 9.5 all round???

Hey can you guys help me out I have a 33 gtst and I'm looking to go different wheels, just wondering if I can 18" 8.5 +30 on the front and 18" 9.5 +38 on the back? Or should I just go same width front and rear, if so should I go 8.5 or 9.5 all round???

That's exactly what my old wheels were and it fit fine. 9.5+38 265/35 on the rear and a 8.5+30 235/40 on the front.

post-109116-1419911417604_thumb.jpg

Edited by dontyellpl0x
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...