Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hang on a minute.....he (Nismoid) has come into this thread and made a smart-arse comment. Paul has explained fully what the situation was, even offering the dyno operators number (not our tuner) if he needed it clarified.......THEN he has come again with another smart-arse comment (world leader crap) So Paul has returned serve....and good on him, are we supposed to sit here and cop it. He doen't need to put up with that crap. Here's a copy of the result and the dyno operators number if anybody wishes to call him for further questions. We are just about over this whole SAU thing.

Someone had to take over from the SST brigade, didn't they ?

You are getting offended by your own words. World leader has your trade mark on it. So, can anyone get a world leading build and performance...? Perth was too far to drive but Sydney is much reachable.

Please do not leave SAU.

well my AFR is flat on both Jim's dynos.... and the dyno at the GONG...

maybe it is just a sensor thing, I would hardly imagine the car is actually tuned like that AFR, as it is not consistant with the other information... i.e. the smooth power curve or the other dyno sheets I have seen....

12-12.5 still seems ok to me :rolleyes:

oh and don't stress Stace :rolleyes:

two.06L - let's settle a few things here once and for all... I think I speak on behalf of many people when I say that the 466rwkw power figure seems a little high for turbos that are rated at 640hp, yet your car is claiming to be pushing 624 hp AT THE WHEELS... And apparently you haven't even turned the boost up!!!! Can you find any logic in what I'm saying??

I'll ask you a simple question, do you think there is a difference in dyno figures when conducting a power run in 'shootout' mode and 'non-shotout mode'??? I have done a comparison with my car (see here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...opic=78364&hl=) and have noticed an increase of around 10%.. So that's why I'm asking if you have a dyno graph in 'non shootout' mode, to make the figure more believable.... My car has 365rwkws, but 396rwkws in shootout mode, does that mean I should preach to the world my car is a 400rwkw monster???

Just have a good think about it...

For anyone thats interested the two Dash 7 GT28R's come up almost line ball with the GT3540R in 1.06 ARR turbine housing form for compressor and turbine flow . The GT28R's (2860R's) have a little more turbine efficiency (75 vs 72%) and flow a little less at lower exhaust gas pressure ratios .

I think HKS GT-SS's use a slightly different comp wheel and the maps would be interesting to compare .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03

Non-shootout mode can be configurated by the dyno owner/operater, so it would be rare to get a conservative figure in that mode. I don't think Ben @ Racepace has any sort of ego regarding impressing customers with large numbers, and so has his kit set more realistic.

2530's use a T3 comp wheel that peaks @ 35lbs/min, theoretically twins are worth 70lbs/min or similar to a T04R/Z - T66 turbo flow wise.

p.s. my dad can still beat up my mum.

TommyK: Have all your goodies been installed and a final tune performed? If so, do you have a dyno sheet you wouldn't mind posting up? IIRC some of your modifications are very similar so it would make an interesting point of comparison.

dont know bout these 'so called' european performance cars...

FIAT stands for:

Fix

It

Again

Toniii

I never thought my European car was a "performance" car :)

BMW: Brings More Women :O:P

You know, the money-grubbing, self-absorbed and ego-centric kind :D

TommyK:  Have all your goodies been installed and a final tune performed?  If so, do you have a dyno sheet you wouldn't mind posting up?  IIRC some of your modifications are very similar so it would make an interesting point of comparison.

Lucien - I do believe I posted one up a while ago. Check for posts by me in the NSW section.

Mind you - I am not happy with my CRD tune. The car is laggier than i would have expected with these turbos. I am going in to BEL tomorrow to get a road tune done. Full boost @ 4800 rpm in 4th is comparable to Mik's tune, and he's running GT-RS turbos :D. Not happy!

Will let you know results tomorrow (hopefully)

Lucien - I do believe I posted one up a while ago. Check for posts by me in the NSW section.

Mind you - I am not happy with my CRD tune. The car is laggier than i would have expected with these turbos. I am going in to BEL tomorrow to get a road tune done. Full boost @ 4800 rpm in 4th is comparable to Mik's tune, and he's running GT-RS turbos :P. Not happy!

Will let you know results tomorrow (hopefully)

Sorry, what I meant was: I remember you saying that the cam timing needed to be played with (and, IIRC, there was also some issue with your boost controller). Hence I was wondering if those issues had been corrected and a dyno done.

Seems like all will be answered soon anyway :O

Tommy k,

This is the 1st negative feedback i've heard from crd's tuning...you need to remember that the gtrs turbo application is top end power. gtss is better for mid range.

Just so you know - I have the same turbo setup on my r32 along with the typical mods i.e. pfc, cams etc.

I can honestly say that crd are the most reputable gtr tuners in nsw & possibly aust - my results were amazing :O

Marko.

Lucien - I do believe I posted one up a while ago. Check for posts by me in the NSW section.

Mind you - I am not happy with my CRD tune. The car is laggier than i would have expected with these turbos. I am going in to BEL tomorrow to get a road tune done. Full boost @ 4800 rpm in 4th is comparable to Mik's tune, and he's running GT-RS turbos :P. Not happy!

Will let you know results tomorrow (hopefully)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...