Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

oh and manages13 my block and head machining has taken over 23 weeks alone (NO assembly at all) thanks to those involved 

shit brad the company i have been using will offen do the same day drop off and pickup if i prebook a week or so out B)

DUDE that is one nice list i only cringe at what it must of cost to put together as i know how much it cost for me to get my build together. Can i ask who you are using for the build and tune? and when you might have it on the road?

pete

  • Replies 315
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats definitely a dream setup.

Very nice pics.

With regards to the rb30det thing.. I think the biggest concern is the height. One big advantage of the 2.7 kits from japland.

But revability... Its got everything to do with gearing and how well the hotside flows. The VL's run a 3.45:1, run that in your Stagea and it too will feel like a big diesel. :(

Edited by Cubes
shit brad the company i have been using will offen do the same day drop off and pickup if i prebook a week or so out B)

DUDE that is one nice list i only cringe at what it must of cost to put together as i know how much it cost for me to get my build together. Can i ask who you are using for the build and tune? and when you might have it on the road?

pete

tuning will be at Racetorque im 99% sure on. they mainly do race cars, and keep quiet in the performance scene in perth. been highly reccomended by another gtr owner with autronics and over 550rwhp.

the build is all done at home, machining hassles where through a few well respected perth shops but failed to show reliability and the shops told me 3 weeks for the block MAX and 2 weeks for head MAX. well im still waiting on the head which has been 12 weeks and the block was 11 weeks :angry:

PM me if u want the name of the shops i used for machining, as i dont want to upset the moderators :)

cost, hmm well im not gonna announce that here, bit over original budget though :lol:

should be in the car by xmas and run-in/tuned by end of january pretty definately. depending on the tuner :)

cheers

Brad

Is anyone else touching themselves looking at those pics?

Adrian

Yes i did...

Wow whats a setup i am jealous...

I think you have done the right thing with the 2.7 kit...

3 litre kits belong in R31's......

Hands down to you Brad, very nice job on your build - all top quality parts there. I'm sure you'll get power with reliability with all that gear.

Good luck with the build and keep us dated on the progress.

thanx guys, well im picking the head up tommorow finally, BUT it isnt assembled as i need shims for the valve springs, cause apparantly the JUN cams are regrind and have a smaller base circle.

so they aint even billet like HKS ones and are regrind from GTR cams. (thats the words of the shop doin the work).

so ive decided we will assemble the head as well, with the help of my uncle who usually does drag engines. shims will be arriving monday next week supposedly.

pretty pissed about the cams but, thought JUN was better than that? B)

does smaller base circle mean they are not as good in making power as a set of hks normal base circle size ones with same degrees and lift?

cheers

Brad

They weren't able to machine up shims?!?!?

The reason for the smaller base circle is to allow for a higher lift without or with very little head modification.

Tomei also uses this method to squeeze out a little more lift.

Edited by Cubes
They weren't able to machine up shims?!?!?

The reason for the smaller base circle is to allow for a higher lift without or with very little head modification.

Tomei also uses this method to squeeze out a little more lift.

no they said the largest shims they had were not big enough and they needed "special" ones made or some shit. sounds like an excuse to charge a shit load of $$$ for f**k all :) gotta be custom made and specially heat treated or something they said.

i took the head off the shop cause they have had it 13-14 weeks to do porting and reassemble, so they ported it and wait till now to check the cams and whether shims r needed and now they delay it another week, plus assembly time. so i told em to not bother and i will do it.

Dont mean to burst your bubble but make sure you get it tuned by a reputable tuner. We tuned a 500hp built 930 Porche TT over here on the Gold Coast. It had been tuned by some guru in Perth that used all of about 5 of 200 available features of an autronic. The car was that rich that it had washed the bores!!!!

I was going to say give Greg at proengines a call about shims, he reshimmed my head and it was a pain in the ass but he got it spot on, with no bullshit. He has posted above me though, so thats obviously where he got the shims from ;)

thanx guys, well im picking the head up tommorow finally, BUT it isnt assembled as i need shims for the valve springs, cause apparantly the JUN cams are regrind and have a smaller base circle.

so they aint even billet like HKS ones and are regrind from GTR cams. (thats the words of the shop doin the work).

so ive decided we will assemble the head as well, with the help of my uncle who usually does drag engines. shims will be arriving monday next week supposedly.

pretty pissed about the cams but, thought JUN was better than that?  B)

does smaller base circle mean they are not as good in making power as a set of hks normal base circle size ones with same degrees and lift?

cheers

Brad

Hi Brad, all of the Jun cams I have seen are billets. They have to use a smaller base circle to get the lift, RB cylinder heads don't have enough room. The Jun instructions and web site both quote the following for all lifts over 10.5 mm;

Clearance of head for cam lobe rotation required.

Special valve spring required.

Special valve retainer required.

The "Special valve retainer required" means the cam has a different (ie; smaller) base circle to standard.

:) cheers :D

There seems to be a few people that are having trouble with machine work being done on their engines, either they are very slow or not done correctly.

Greg at Proengines posts here on the SAU and the work he has done for me has been nothing but exceptional and in a timely fashion. Won't go anywhere else now.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...