Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i haven't tried to take the sump off yet. i was going to put them in when i replace the clutch, but after talking to a mate today he reckons sump baffle fitting requires engine removal.

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i haven't tried to take the sump off yet. i was going to put them in when i replace the clutch, but after talking to a mate today he reckons sump baffle fitting requires engine removal.

your mate is 100% correct

Hey Richard,

Sorry to but in !

You promised me a sticker and I still havn"t got it!

Merry Christmas!

MIB :D

i haven't tried to take the sump off yet. i was going to put them in when i replace the clutch, but after talking to a mate today he reckons sump baffle fitting requires engine removal.

hehe, always me me me with you!! :blink:

I'm sure duncan has one he can give you if you see him first. I'll be away (in japan) for most of jan but i'll certainly bring one with me to the first state champs round.

merry christmas mate.

Richard

one of the most important things you should do is put in an EXTRA 1.5 LITRES of oil.

i tested this on the track with a mechanicl oil pressure guage.

on the street with standard evrything and the oil on the high mark it surges its head of by just acelerating flat out in first and abit of second!!!!

with an extra 1.5 litres it seems to be ok.(basicly filled up to just over the hump on the bottom of the dipstick.

yes motor out on a stand to do a sumpbaffel.

could be done but by the time you spend cleaning all of the threebond out of the sump and the rest,you could of pulled the motor out.

but then there is the question of upgrading the oil pump at the same time?

id advise to do both :lol:

this car kicked ass so much so at bathuarst, its now a v8 only race. so much for the competition ,a 2 horse race how boring, keep practicing

Precisely.  The explanation came from the original R32 GT-R test drives done by both Wheels & by Car magazine.  The description in Wheels is as follows:

"Nissan's sophisticated Super HICAS system works in two distinct steps; initially in reverse phase (with the rear wheels turning through a small arc in the opposite direction to the front) before moving to the parallel phase."

Car was a bitmore effusive:

"The rear wheels counter-steer to help the Skyline turn into the corner, and then steer in the same direction as the fronts, to help stability.... At high speed, though, the maximum movement is approximately 0.3 degrees"

Unfortunately neither nominate a speed at which the system works/stops working.  From what I understand it changes phases, ie from counter steer to same phase when you get on the accelerator.

The reason that some people say it makes the car's handling more unpredicatble is that when you turn the car into a corner you need to differentiate between the HICAS working and the back end losing grip & starting to slide.  Sometimes that is not so easy.  Disabling the HICAS means when you feel the back end getting loose you are running out of grip.  Having said that everything it does after turn in, in my humble opinion, is all good.

Edited by nobby

with an extra 1.5 litres it seems to be ok.(basicly filled up to just over the hump on the bottom of the dipstick.

been telling people this for the last 5 years ... will they ever listen

nope they just keep saying i cant come out to the track cause i dont have sump baffels

classic case of SBS = sump baffel syndrom

I ran a few track days without the baffles, just overfilling a bit. It seemed to be ok, but I did get a lot of oil pissing out the dipstick and a lot of blow by through the breather pipes. I now have the Trust sump extension/with baffle and extended pickup, with an N1 oil pump and Trust 16 row oil cooler and relocation kit. Man does it take some oil now!! I over filled the 1st time at the track with this and had the same messy oil probem and since have only filled to the high mark with no messy oil dramas. Do the rest of you overfillers have the same problem? I tried fixing it by putting an extra o-ring on the dipstick which helped a little but it still forced some out. I also have since fitted a Nismo air/oil separator to keep to oil out of the intake.

I ran a few track days without the baffles, just overfilling a bit.  It seemed to be ok, but I did get a lot of oil pissing out the dipstick and a lot of blow by through the breather pipes.  I now have the Trust sump extension/with baffle and extended pickup, with an N1 oil pump and Trust 16 row oil cooler and relocation kit.  Man does it take some oil now!!  I over filled the 1st time at the track with this and had the same messy oil probem and since have only filled to the high mark with no messy oil dramas.  Do the rest of you overfillers have the same problem?  I tried fixing it by putting an extra o-ring on the dipstick which helped a little but it still forced some out.  I also have since fitted a Nismo air/oil separator to keep to oil out of the intake.

Hey Jason, can you post up a picture of your oil/air separator. I have seen some GT-R fill their catch cans within a few laps. It is because some people install a high volume oil pump without matching it to an oil restrictor to reduce the volume of oil pumped into the head. What then happens is that with some lateral gees & high revs the cam covers get filled with oil & it goes from there into the catch can.

The setups for some track GT-Rs are quite particular as to how they plug into the breathers on the cam covers. The White's R34 that they used in Targa Tassie is a good example. I think I may have a photo somewhere of the engine bay.

As for the overfillers (Guilty as charged) I don't have any problems with oil going places it shouldn't.

Yeah, I have a few mates fill up their catch cans, usually takes about 10-12 laps for them. The Nismo item is the one out of the Z-tune catalogue, same item for 33 and 34. It has a little baffle between the inlet hose (bottom) and the outlet (to intake) or top hose. The oil return goes straight out the bottom of the can and joins the oil return line for the rear turbo. The 90 bend out of the turbo gets replaced with a new T piece. The only problem encountered was the new T piece needed a spacer made up as it wasn't long enough to clear the housing on the turbo. I thought buying nismo would have mean't perfect fitment???? I guess not. . . .

The thing I do like about it though is it looks very factory and I don't have big long breather pipes going right across the engine bay. For those who like to look as stock as possible :)

post-1841-1135211249.jpg

Yeah, I have a few mates fill up their catch cans, usually takes about 10-12 laps for them.  The Nismo item is the one out of the Z-tune catalogue, same item for 33 and 34.  It has a little baffle between the inlet hose (bottom) and the outlet (to intake) or top hose.  The oil return goes straight out the bottom of the can and joins the oil return line for the rear turbo.  The 90 bend out of the turbo gets replaced with a new T piece.  The only problem encountered was the new T piece needed a spacer made up as it wasn't long enough to clear the housing on the  turbo.  I thought buying nismo would have mean't perfect fitment????  I guess not. . . .

The thing I do like about it though is it looks very factory and I don't have big long breather pipes going right across the engine bay.  For those who like to look as stock as possible  :)

That is a neat installation. I have seen some really horrible ones with hoses trailing all over the engine bay & dodgy holes punched into the top of the catch can to allow it to breath. Also the constabulary don't much like external breathers on the things...

Can I ask where from & how much?

That practically looks factory!

it would want to lol. from memory the nismo catch tanks are about 40 000 yen retail. very nice though.

Yeah, I am always copping heaps about the cost, but I am the one who is laughing when between sprint sessions I am kicking back drinking a coke and they are stuffing around emptying there catch cans. :)

Got it from Nengun

http://www.nengun.com/catalogue/product/314

I was going to go an ARC one (or copy) but I am not a big fan on the one or two breather pipes going the full ength of the engine bay even though that seems to be the most popular. It just looks untidy IMHO.

The oil return goes straight out the bottom of the can and joins the oil return line for the rear turbo.

That would worry me. When the engines gets excessive blowby it will pressurise the oil return from the turbo. This could mean low (or even zero) oil flow to the rear turbo. Even a short, instaneous excess of blow by (eg; missed gear change) could be enough to seize the shaft due to the lack of oil.

That's why we always have separate oil return to the sump.

:P cheers :D

That would worry me.  When the engines gets excessive blowby it will pressurise the oil return from the turbo.  This could mean low (or even zero) oil flow to the rear turbo. Even a short, instaneous excess of blow by (eg; missed gear change) could be enough to seize the shaft due to the lack of oil.

That's why we always have separate oil return to the sump.

:P cheers :D

Gary, I am missing some understanding somewhere (ok, most places, but I digress). Doesn't the oil return from the turbos feed into the sump in any case? I thought that it wouldn't matter much where the return line from the catch can goes as pressure will be present in the sump from blow by anyway. But as I said, maybe I am missing something....

Judging by the amount of oil that sprayed out when I couldn't get the T-peice to seal off, I can't imagine a little oil dribbling down from can could effect it much at all. If it behaves anything like a stormwater line, then the oil from the can would just back up until pressure from the turbo return subsided, not the other way around??? All it does it join into the oil return from the turbo which then goes straight into the sump. Can't see how it could have any effect on the oil going into the turbo. And wouldn't most (if not all) of the pressure be released as gas back into the intake, which would be an area of much lower pressure, leaving the oil to just dribble down the oil return. That is how I thought it would all work anyway.

  • 6 months later...
I ran a few track days without the baffles, just overfilling a bit. It seemed to be ok, but I did get a lot of oil pissing out the dipstick and a lot of blow by through the breather pipes. I now have the Trust sump extension/with baffle and extended pickup, with an N1 oil pump and Trust 16 row oil cooler and relocation kit. Man does it take some oil now!! I over filled the 1st time at the track with this and had the same messy oil probem and since have only filled to the high mark with no messy oil dramas. Do the rest of you overfillers have the same problem? I tried fixing it by putting an extra o-ring on the dipstick which helped a little but it still forced some out. I also have since fitted a Nismo air/oil separator to keep to oil out of the intake.

I am having big blow by problems on the track also. None through the dipstick, just through the breathers. I fill the ARC catch can in 4 laps. :(

My oil pump is stock...I think??? I never replaced it. So I am a bit weiry to add an extra 1 lt of oil.

Will the trust sump extension kit with baffle and pick up reduce my blow by?

Has anyone used the Mines Rocket Cover Baffle Kit?

I need help I hate having this problem at the track, it gets VERY messy :wave:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...