Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well, finally got there.....

dirty 30

256deg 9.15mm lift cams

greddy intake

1000cc injectors

haltwch platinum pro

1mm mls head gasket

spool rods/piston kit 9:1cr

spool awd adapter

6 boost mani

china gt42 bush bearing

4inch zorst

5 inch metal cat

tomei intank pump

98 octane from 7/11

444.8rwkw @19-20psi

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...

post-84952-14052458385401_thumb.jpg

140000km bottom end

N1 oil pump

Std rb25det head with internal vct mod

850cc injectors

Greedy copy inlet manifold

Hybrid exhaust manifold

Precision turbo intercooler

Gtx3076r .82 rear with tial 44 mm gate of the snail

Eboost street

16psi 285kw through an auto with cam issues. Time for an adjustable exhaust wheel to see what happens

post-88690-0-39907600-1405713068_thumb.jpg

Rb25/30

Nitto i beams

Je pistons

Custom cams

Custom porting

Supertech solid lifters

Supertech 1mm o/s valve,spring,retainers

Ross external oil pump/trigger/balancer

Custom sump

Billet flywheel

Bosch 2000cc

Fake greddy manifold

Home made turbo manifold

6262 .85 t3

463kw 1082nm 23psi

E66 united

Tuned by mrc dyno castle hill

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

My home built 30DET, in a gq wagon.

R32 25de head, (no vct)

de cams, 26 valve springs,

Adjustable gears,

Inlet -2' exhaust +4' to move torque lower.

Home made steam pipe hi mount,

Tial 44mm gate

3" exhaust, 3" cat, straight through mufflers.

Chinese t04e, .63 rear.

2.5" cooler pipes,

front facing stock inlet (cut/shut)

Rb25 neo injectors

Apexi power fc.

R31 block, honed, stock rods, stock pistons, moly Hastings rings, acl race bearings, VL turbo oil pump.

Mls-r 1.3mm head gasket.

244.3 hp atw on 33" tires and through a patrol drive line. 4.9:1 diff.

Turbo is really crap and way to small to make more power but it's built for grunt. Not outright hp. post-92047-0-73206500-1406771521_thumb.jpg

Edit -the small power figure is my before run, n/a rb30 single cam on straight lpg. Was a sad thing to drive!

Edited by nicksamaniac
  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

post-84952-14108608797354_thumb.jpg

Gtx3076

Tial 44mm ext gate off housing

Lt12 ecu

Eboost street

850cc injectors

Hks 256 in 264 exh vct cams

Hybrid manifold

Forward facing plenum

Precision cooler

All through a built r34 auto with 3000 rpm converter

15psi boost

E85 and lt16c computer next month

Edited by steve200b
  • 1 month later...

R33 Series 2 RB25 head, RB30de Bottom

Gtx3076, 0.82 rear

Steam-Pipe Manifold

ID1000 injectors

VCT enabled

Vipec ECU with Haltech LCD screen

United E85

367.3kW @ 18psi. Made 385kw on 20psi but used for continous track laps - final tune attached

(how do you attach an image.... :unsure:_)

med_gallery_91299_5749_32519.jpg
R34 GTR RB26 head, RB30DE bottom

Standard Valves, dual valve springs

Custom forged CP Pistons

Tomei Cams (Can't remember specs, will find out)

2860 -5s

Tomei cam gears

Walbro 460L(?) E85 fuel pump

Custom dump pipes

Custom 2.5" front pipes

Custom 3.5" exhaust

Standard Intercooler

Standard Airbox

E85

30PSI

Edited by R0yalT
  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

Fully built RB30/26. PTE 6266. Tomei Poncams. 98 RON Pump Fuel.

485whp @ 0.9 bar

615whp @ 1.6 bar

(Forgive me for the stupid torque axis, was too excited after the tune haha)

Hiboost_zps9ae793ac.png

Edited by G37Sam
  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...

Rb26/30

Cp flat top forged Pistons

Precision h beam rods

Acl race bearings

Balanced

Os giken twin plate clutch

R32 stock head machined 120thou

Stock fuel pump, airflow meters, injectors

Apexi pod filters and cast bends

Nistune ecu

R34 GTR dump pipes , full xforce 3.5 inch stainless exhaust

Standard cast manifolds with garrett/hks gtrs twin turbos tuned on bp98 fuel post-134876-14194237982441_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...

Just had the first run in tune, not sure what I am going to get when it has the final tune, I will post the results. They said it was at 7500RPM ?

Nitto 3.2 Stroker Kit
PT6262 turbo
Custom 260 10.8 cams,springs and retainers
Haltech 34GTR ECU/Boost controller
3.5 inch custom exhaust ( as a DD as quiet as it could be without restricting flow)
Supertech 1 mm OS Valves set

RB 26 head, cleaned up
9Lt sump conversion/ Nitto comp Pump
Koyorad Radiator
Walbro 460Lt fuel pump, (see how it goes)

Haltech E-Flex Sensor kit

Other stuff needed to make it all work


Yokohama AD08R
Nismo Super Coppermix twin C Spec clutch / Slave Cylinder
Quaife Front diff
Modified Trannie
Nismo 2-way LSD back diff




t run in tune, not sure what I am going to get when it has the final tune, I will post the results

post-52098-0-16451100-1425701088_thumb.gif

  • 4 weeks later...

RoyalT managed 450kw with a walbro 460ltr fuel pump and u are also using the same pump...sounds positive!

Are u guys running these fuel pumps independent as an intank?

My pump is just a normal setup and replaced a Bosch 044

Going in next week for the final tune and will post results, busting to see if I get the car I tried to build :)

Edited by Nismo 3.2ish
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...