Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I am just curios to see who has the most modified non-turbo straight 6 skyline on the forum. Also interested in what kind of power it's putting out at the wheels. and i guess any circuit times or drag times would be interesting too.

Thanks :P

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

that guy with the v8 does... but.. of course it's a v8.. so i dunno...

Maybe the other guy who's building up with his rb30?

Edit: names are BADR33 and NAR33

Edited by ignuz

I am building (and have been for quite some time...) a stroker RB.

compression 13:1

3.4litre capacity

gtr throttle bodies

custom titanium oversize valves

Am looking at putting out around 350 - 400 HP

does that count?

I am building (and have been for quite some time...) a stroker RB.

compression 13:1

3.4litre capacity

gtr throttle bodies

custom titanium oversize valves

Am looking at putting out around 350 - 400 HP

does that count?

:O:(:O:D:O:):O

I am building (and have been for quite some time...) a stroker RB.

compression 13:1

3.4litre capacity

gtr throttle bodies

custom titanium oversize valves

Am looking at putting out around 350 - 400 HP

does that count?

come again :rolleyes:

yeah stroker

looks way cool

boring and stroking or just stroking

big money for that if u need custom crank

i would imagine you would be starting with a rb26dett engine and stroking it with a rb30 crank and boring it with custom pistons??

I am building (and have been for quite some time...) a stroker RB.

compression 13:1

3.4litre capacity

gtr throttle bodies

custom titanium oversize valves

Am looking at putting out around 350 - 400 HP

does that count?

yeah baby! that's what i'm talking about.

to the guy who posted above, i knew about NA33s V8 build up, which was awesome, but i'm interested in some lines with performance NA RBs in them.

this one looks to be the goods. man it will sound awesome too with the 6 throttle inlet. mmm

yeah baby! that's what i'm talking about.

to the guy who posted above, i knew about NA33s V8 build up, which was awesome, but i'm interested in some lines with performance NA RBs in them.

this one looks to be the goods. man it will sound awesome too with the 6 throttle inlet. mmm

mm, porn for your ears

I am building (and have been for quite some time...) a stroker RB.

compression 13:1

3.4litre capacity

gtr throttle bodies

custom titanium oversize valves

Am looking at putting out around 350 - 400 HP

does that count?

as HKS release a 3.4L kit for 2JZ

and i heard the RB30 bore and stoke are same

i have been "thinking" about it for a while... during day dream :lol:

just wonder where do u get yr crank shaft from?

as u are in adelaide would u mind let me have a look with yr's?

Edited by Maxx

mines not really that hard out. still havnt got it running :) stupid electrical issues. once its running i will be getting it dynod on the 18th of march then on the 19th ill be doing a 1/8mile drag

the guy with the v8 doesnt count cus its not a stright 6.. plus hes put a supercharger on it lol. but that is still a damn crazy car!!

mmm rb34de... ;):)

I HAVE AN RB30DE . Has a stock rb25de head ( stock cams valves and not ported ) , rb25det 370 cc injectors , extractors , 10.5 -1 compression , twin rb25de throttle bodies , Apexi safc 2 . Its in a 1986 aussie built station wagon with manual gearbox . Never been on a dyno , but best 1/4 mile time is 14.4 @ 94 mph .

the fella with the v8 r33. What v8 motor does he have in the car? holden,ford? or a lexus motor etc?

Very interesting. If i blow up 1 more rb25det, i might consider that

its a vh45des: nissan's 4.5 litre v8 dual ovc and he supercharged it

I HAVE AN RB30DE . Has a stock rb25de head ( stock cams valves and not ported ) , rb25det 370 cc injectors , extractors , 10.5 -1 compression , twin rb25de throttle bodies , Apexi safc 2 . Its in a 1986 aussie built station wagon with manual gearbox . Never been on a dyno , but best 1/4 mile time is 14.4 @ 94 mph .

you have to chuck it on the dyno don

ur r31 has to be one of the meanest non turbo r31's with 'original' engine in aus

(i no that the r31 skyline club has a pretty mean list, but a lot of them are engine swaps, but ur is unique which makes it cool http://forum.r31skylineclub.com/index.php?topic=133.0 - fastest r31 1/4 mile times - notice don is second in na r31's)

Edited by usherly

I have offset ground the standard rb30 crank.

The rod journals are quite small now (as you can imagine with that stroke increase!) but the radi in the corner has been trippled, so the strength will be fine.

Standard rb30 block (.040" oversize), forged rods and pistons.

I am using an rb20 head (for the small combustion chamber) radicaly modified inlet ports and simmilar sized valves as the gtr.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...