Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Some facts on KKR, to help reduce some of the confusion.

Yes they are a plain bearing or 'bush' type turbo. A lot of people put too much weight on this specification, when really the way the turbo performs on the engine is what matters and there are clearly plenty of users who are happy with the results.

They come with a 6-month unlimited replacement warranty, which is the best warranty offered by any turbo manufacturer to our knowledge.

They are not the same as the many 'ebay turbos' that have been mentioned. These are manufactured by a company which builds turbos for various European OEM customers, using all German machines.

They are not a direct bolt-on for any particular engine, but the work required to fit a KKR430 or KKR480 to an RB20 or RB25 is not very complicated and the whole job can be done in half a day. It is true that with a dump pipe and installation the KKR480 will cost $1500-1600, but compare this to most other options and you will find it is still extremely cheap. Remember fitting any turbo, including a 'bolt-on kit' will cost a few hundred in labour.

As for power output, we have seen many RB25s making 240-260kW at the wheels with a KKR480 and 16-18psi boost. We have also seen the odd unusual example making close to 300kW, but given the manufacturer rating of 480hp, mid-200s are a realistic expectation.

We have yet to see any KKR430 turbos used in a high boost application, but with 12-14psi we have seen 180-215kW at the wheels on RB20 and RB25 applications. The smaller exhaust housing and turbine make it less suitable for high-boost applications, but it is very efficient at moderate boost levels.

On an RB25 a KKR480 will deliver full boost at around 4000-4500rpm, depending on tuning, cam timing etc. A KKR430 will deliver full boost by 3500rpm, but both turbos begin to produce boost from much lower rpm.

Ultimately the results will vary a lot depending on tuning and the other parts fitted to the car, but keeping in mind the price, the KKR turbos are hard to beat on a dollar-per-horsepower ratio.

Anyone wanting more information should refer to www.otomoto.com.au or email [email protected]

post-5573-1141261890.jpg

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Some facts on KKR, to help reduce some of the confusion.

Yes they are a plain bearing or 'bush' type turbo. A lot of people put too much weight on this specification, when really the way the turbo performs on the engine is what matters and there are clearly plenty of users who are happy with the results.

They come with a 6-month unlimited replacement warranty, which is the best warranty offered by any turbo manufacturer to our knowledge.

They are not the same as the many 'ebay turbos' that have been mentioned. These are manufactured by a company which builds turbos for various European OEM customers, using all German machines.

They are not a direct bolt-on for any particular engine, but the work required to fit a KKR430 or KKR480 to an RB20 or RB25 is not very complicated and the whole job can be done in half a day. It is true that with a dump pipe and installation the KKR480 will cost $1500-1600, but compare this to most other options and you will find it is still extremely cheap. Remember fitting any turbo, including a 'bolt-on kit' will cost a few hundred in labour.

As for power output, we have seen many RB25s making 240-260kW at the wheels with a KKR480 and 16-18psi boost. We have also seen the odd unusual example making close to 300kW, but given the manufacturer rating of 480hp, mid-200s are a realistic expectation.

We have yet to see any KKR430 turbos used in a high boost application, but with 12-14psi we have seen 180-215kW at the wheels on RB20 and RB25 applications. The smaller exhaust housing and turbine make it less suitable for high-boost applications, but it is very efficient at moderate boost levels.

On an RB25 a KKR480 will deliver full boost at around 4000-4500rpm, depending on tuning, cam timing etc. A KKR430 will deliver full boost by 3500rpm, but both turbos begin to produce boost from much lower rpm.

Ultimately the results will vary a lot depending on tuning and the other parts fitted to the car, but keeping in mind the price, the KKR turbos are hard to beat on a dollar-per-horsepower ratio.

Anyone wanting more information should refer to www.otomoto.com.au or email [email protected]

Judging by that dyno graph, it shows that positive boost (around 3psi) is made ~3300rpm and full boost is achieved at ~5000 rpm? Is it just me or does that seem a little late?

Ben, on your own website

Tested by Croydon Racing Developments on an RB25DET Neo engine, it produced 242kW at the wheels at 18psi.

297rwkw is 55rwkw more, with 3psi less boost.

On a motor that has a 1.8mm head gasket, i find that also to be quite interesting.

Upto 20rwkw variance i could believe... 55rwkw variance my mind tells me isnt correct.

Also, would you be able to shed some light as to how a stock RB25... which means 370cc injectors to the best of my knowledge... can make 297rwkw?

There is no mention of a massive fuel rail pressure increase that im aware of, being its a stock motor.

Im very interested to know the above as are many others im sure

Ben, on your own website

297rwkw is 55rwkw more, with 3psi less boost.

On a motor that has a 1.8mm head gasket, i find that also to be quite interesting.

Upto 20rwkw variance i could believe... 55rwkw variance my mind tells me isnt correct.

Also, would you be able to shed some light as to how a stock RB25... which means 370cc injectors to the best of my knowledge... can make 297rwkw?

There is no mention of a massive fuel rail pressure increase that im aware of, being its a stock motor.

Im very interested to know the above as are many others im sure

Best to call Jake's Performance for info on the tuning of this particular car. It did have a huge fuel pressure increase as far as we know. As for the later spooling, again this relates to tuning, cam timing, compression ratio etc.

Abit off topic: my r33 made 290rwkw on standard injectors. this was with massive fuel pressure increase and 044 pump. tuned by matty spry in se qld. most se qld people will know who he is. My comment is to support the fact that 360+rwhp can be made on stock injectors but they will be at there limits. Several qld cars have made over 400rwhp on stock injectors and ran into the mid 120mph range down the 1/4. I would say they should take that car down the track to show its potentail.

Abit off topic: my r33 made 290rwkw on standard injectors. this was with massive fuel pressure increase and 044 pump. tuned by matty spry in se qld. most se qld people will know who he is. My comment is to support the fact that 360+rwhp can be made on stock injectors but they will be at there limits. Several qld cars have made over 400rwhp on stock injectors and ran into the mid 120mph range down the 1/4. I would say they should take that car down the track to show its potentail.

have a quick looksy at

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...e=post&id=25136

if you wanna see how this turbo combo compares against some other rb25 turbo setup.s

With a lower BP reading is shows a higher RWKW figure as its in shootout mode. My friend has a dyno shop and his dyno read around 98BP when it was 101BP. I kept on getting high figures approx 10% higher. Went back to the shop when it was fixed and he showed me how it all works ala, now true RWKW not inflated. I'd hate to think of the true lower RWKW of a 93BP reading.

With a lower BP reading is shows a higher RWKW figure as its in shootout mode. My friend has a dyno shop and his dyno read around 98BP when it was 101BP. I kept on getting high figures approx 10% higher. Went back to the shop when it was fixed and he showed me how it all works ala, now true RWKW not inflated. I'd hate to think of the true lower RWKW of a 93BP reading.

Bear in mind that Canberra is comparatively high altitude, so the BP should be lower.

From my perswonal experience there is one particlar e-bay turbo that is BAD - The '50 70' as some call it... This is the turbo on the MX6 link, and has nerouse bad reviews everywhere.

I have fitted the T70 to serveral cars now with excellent results, and seem to fine for long term also with the first that I fitted 8 months ago still going strong. They are rated at 600 so expected to be laggy.

I have also tuned 2 CA1DET's with the KKR 330 and KKR 430, the 430 was fairly laggy on the CA, but the 330 gave me the biggest shock! 206 rwkw @ 16 psi with awesome response.... I am completely confident the 430 would be an excellent turbo on a larger capacity (2lt or 2.5lt) motor.

Summary:

EBay - '50 70' = BAD

EBay - 'T70' = Good

KKR - =Good

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...