Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering why so many manufacturers make FWD sports cars. I assume they know what they are doing. My thoughts on it are:

1) They consider FWD's to be safer, esp when they are short wheelbase cars;

2) There aren't enough buyers to make it worthwhile on all cars. My thoughts on this are that there would be a whole new market if they made them in RWD and those that don't care will continue to buy anyway.

Specifically I am thinking about the following cars:

1) Renault Clio Sport. Obviously a good car already though could be better I assume with RWD. Same goes for the Megane Sport or whatever it's called;

2) Celica. Not my cup of tea though maybe of interest if it were RWD.

3) Any "hot hatch" you can name.

By changing to RWD you get rid of torque steer, understeer and adds what I believe to be a better driving experience.

I could be wrong, but I think the Mitsu 380, Toyota Sportivo Camry and Maxima would be a lot more popular if they were RWD. I honestly think this is one of the reasons why Holdend Commodores and Ford Falcons are so popular in Aust.

Maybe I'm in a small minority here. Maybe my focus is on Aust's preference and not factoring the possibility that other countries make up the majority of the market and don't care..

What do you think?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/113597-why-so-many-fwd-sports-cars/
Share on other sites

FWD became popular when SUVs came along, and I think it's the feeling that one gets when driving a FWD. I know I feel a little bit more powerful, and get a little bit more of a rush when I'm driving a FWD, so if that's combined with a sports car's body, I can see why manufacturers would be leaning towards them.

its a marketing ploy so that morons think driving around in a FWD gay mobile will make them cool enough to say to people "oh yea i dive a Honda sports car, im so f*king cool"

... when we all know the truth about these people

Gees, dont hold back tell us what u really think...lol This Forum is both informative and entertaining.

All the cars you mention are designated and marketed as sporty variations of a standard production hatch or sedan....none are considered sports cars, the closest you have mentioned to a "sports car" is the Celica which at a pinch is in the same class of car as our beloved Skylines, GT (grand tourer) not "sports car"

Putting an S badge on a car doesn't make it a sports car, nor are they being marketed as such.

pfffft sports cars...cough

Celica is a GT car? Since when?

FWD sports cars exist because from the late '70s FWD was the prefered driveline that was cheap to develop, safer (to a degree), and offered more cabin space for small cars. The Sports versions are just marketing, but Toyota, Honda, Renault etc developed the concept to the point were alot of the shortcomings of FWD drivelines were almost done away with (especially with the Honda Integra Type R).

So you could say that some people actually prefered to drive these 'proper' FWD sports cars. Well that and the distinct lack of RWD sports cars from big makers like Nissan in recent years :)

Just look at the BMW 1 Series. It's a 'FWD type' body in dimensions, but the driveline is RWD, which harks back to the '70s when the majority of smaller cars were still RWD. The 1 Series (especially the 3.0 model) is the best small car around... because it's RWD. But the same amount of people that think it's good because it's RWD will say it's bad because it's so cramped in the rear seats...

Celica is a GT car? Since when?

Since about 2 decades before you got pubes most probably.....

Yeah it's stretch, but it's the only car above a generic shopping trolley that was mentioned as a "fwd sports car" that actually fits into a semi-sports category :)

Since about 2 decades before you got pubes most probably.....

That would put it about 1968 then suckah... :)

I thought you were talking about FWD Celicas. The early '81 - '86 MA61 Celica XX (Supra in AU) was the last time a Celica could be called a proper GT car.

its easy, all those sport(y) cars are built on an existing FWD platform the manufacturer had available.

the bigger question is why do nissan import the maxima to australia when they could get the skyline (same motor, similar platform but rwd) for only a couple of grand more?

btw there is nothing wrong with a well set up fwd car, I used to race fwd and they can be very quick when driven properly.

the big difference is you can't put big to huge power thru a fwd as there is to much torque steer (not so bad on the track but a pain on the road). Each of the cars in the first post is under 200hp so its not fair to compare to a gtr, maybe a stock gtst...

I would have thought both the R33 GTS25T and R34 GTT could keep up with a Integra Type R on track. I understand that the Type R's are one of the best FWD's going around. I would have thought they would lose out on the straights and make it up through the corners. Does anyone have actual experience with these two cars on the track.

And why did we get Avalons over Chasers...

Anyway. The renult thing, it does have a RWD version with a 2l V6 where you would normally find the rear seats. The orginal version was just stupid, REALLY bad turning circle.

Few you missed, turbo astra. The power they have is just insane. ST focus, 5cyl 2.5l turbo in a fwd car (volvo engine) I saw the thing on top gear, it went ok. Golf GTi, VERY good car. Megane (sp?) turbo, once again massive power. Then a few years back you had the sportivo corollas with the celica engine. The festiva has a 2l version as well now. All FWD, all a lot of power for the size of the car. Thing is, there is a trend. They are all of simlar cost (at least in europe where their biggest market is) size, etc. People just want a fast version. The cost to do one off awd or rwd versions just for the sake of doing it is pointless, and just not marketable for the extra cost. (leaving out the R32 golfs, they are a different car limited numbers and you pay for it)

In regards to the bigger cars, I guess most middle Australia doesnt care that much about handleing. However your big fords and holdens have been loosing sales. Your 'sports' camarys etc obviously arent sports, its like an 'S pac' commo, you get a body kit and for that essencially a slower car. But they look ok, and are more econmical than their RWD counterparts. That and the euro and japanese sedans are doing much better now as they are far better cars.

Handeling, well 40years to develop it with todays technology is good enough for me, they know how the stuff works, so they can build it so it can.

FWD gives a lot more direct steering feedback, and cornering .. its not neccessarily a worse setup. But when you get to a certain amount of power (i.e. lots) its hard to get it to the ground, but as said above quite a lot of cars do it pretty well these days. Those that say "its not RWD therefore it must be crap" are often the same ones that drive falcondores..

FWD cars will always be there, for regions such as europe, asia etc where space is a bit of a premium, there are many narrow windy roads, and where you don't need big thumping fuel guzzlers - resulting in generally smaller engined cars which suit a FWD platform a bit better. And there will always be a demand for something that little bit faster, etc.

Oh, I forgot. The alfa 147 gta. 3.2l V6. FWD again. Same with the Brera, I doubt you couldnt call that a sports car.

One thing tho. No such thing as a FWD Supercar. Sports car yes, supercar no.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The final part arrived today to un-clampify and simplify the intake Who would have though a 1/2" hose stainless bulkhead fitting designed for below waterline bilge pumps would be what I needed Test fit on a 3" offcut I had laying around to see if it would work, and it worked a treat All going well the intake will be on its "final version" tomorrow 
    • Good luck on the weekend mate
    • Must have been an absolute nightmare to drive when the power steer was out, the rack ratio/wheel size/caster is all set up for power assistance
    • Welcome to SAU, what are you looking at buying?
    • I checked the injectors again (1 and 2, since they’re easiest to access) to make sure they weren’t clogged. Even though the entire fuel system had been cleaned, I wanted to be certain. Everything looked clean, so I reinstalled and connected everything. When I started the car to confirm everything was okay, it immediately revved up high, so I shut it off straight away. I checked to see if I’d missed a vacuum hose or something, but everything was connected. On the second attempt, the car ran without the high idle, but I noticed a distinct “compressed air” sound coming from the engine bay. Tracing the sound, I pushed injector #6 forward slightly and the noise stopped — it turned out it wasn’t seated properly, despite the fuel rail being bolted down. While holding it in place, the car idled steadily without stalling and ran for over 5 minutes. At this point, I pulled all six injectors out just in case I hadn’t seated them correctly or dirt had gotten onto the O-rings. Unfortunately, I discovered that I had damaged 3 out of 6 injectors (the OEM 270cc ones) during installation. So yes, this was my fault. Since only the pintle caps were damaged, I’ve ordered a Fuel Injector Service Kit from NZEFI to refurbish them. In the meantime, I reinstalled my new injectors – the car now idles fine for over 15 minutes without stalling. I have not attempted to drive it so far. It’s not perfect yet, as it hesitates when the throttle is pressed, but it’s a big improvement. Unplugging the IACV with the new injectors idles at around 800rpm, even with the IACV screw tightened fully. But this is probably due to tune.
×
×
  • Create New...