Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Apparently Optimax extreme is bad for our (skylines) cars. Some report was done in Japan and its now banned or something. No joke.

So far i've found my r33 s2 loves Mobile Synergy 8000 the best.

Im yet to try full tank of Synergy but so far my R33 loves BP Ultimate... runs better mileage than Optimax... also doesnt have that sulfer smell...

And yes I heard Extreme has ethanol which is a no for Skylines.

Edited by Sir-D

We have been running Optimax Extreme in the R33GTST for months. I have removed the filter twice and cut it open to see if there is any hose or pump damage and it was perfectly clean everytime. I have also removed cleaned and flow tested the injectors and they are exaclty as they should be.

So the urban myth that 5% ethanol corrodes rubber hoses is 100% BS.

So the urban myth that 5% ethanol corrodes fuel pumps is 100% BS.

So the urban myth that 5% ethanol destroys fuel injectors is 100% BS.

The R33GTST currently has a Power FC running the default maps, which usually means knock over 60 frequently. With Optimax Extreme in it we rarely see knock over 10, the peak was 25 one cold night. Based on the amount of ingition timing retard we have had to use to get the knock below 30 using 98 ron (ANY 98 ron) that is worth 12 rwkw.

Don't get sucked into the ethanol is bad, that may apply to 20% or higher proportions. But 5% is NOT the same story.

So I see no downsides to using Optimax Extreme and I am not the only one. Check around and you will find plenty of guys using it.

:laugh: cheers :D

I too have a r32 gts-t and I am convinced that mobil synergy 8000 is the best fuel. I get the most mileage out of it and when i use bp ultimate or shell optimax i tend to notice a stonger smell of petrol when i have car ideling on cool down.

I read an article on ethanol fuels and im pretty sure i remember reading that Nissan had released a statement that Nissan owners of cars pre 2002 (i think) should not use an ethonal fuel of any mixture.

Personally I wouldn't bother with extreme, if you really want more octaneyou could use a octane booster, but again not a lot a point if your car is relatively stock.

(using synergy i got 560km at which point the needle was on Empty but i filled it up and it took 51litres so it wasnt bone dry obviously, but either way thats less than 10lt/100km and on that same tank i had a few runs with my mates g-tech and wasn't exactly puttering around town on Sunday afternoon's.)

Edited by r32line

Yeah in my opinion Extreme is a rip off.

Its more expensive than Optimax, isn't the point of ethanol blended fuels that they are meant to be cheaper? That 5% ethanol is 5% petrol they dont have to put in (about $5 worth these days for a full tank).

You'll find that in most cases 95 octane is 7 cents dearer than regular ULP and 98 octane is 10 cents more. And then that optimax ultimate happy fuel is even more. You can't get it in South Australia but i wouldn't mind trying a tank of it.

im still really sceptical about using it. As sydneykid says it does not corrode the fuel system etc and he has done tests, i heard that this will only happen after a long period of time. e.g you leave your car near the beach once it wont rust. but after years it will start to show. ?? what does everyone think?

We have been running Optimax Extreme in the R33GTST for months. I have removed the filter twice and cut it open to see if there is any hose or pump damage and it was perfectly clean everytime. I have also removed cleaned and flow tested the injectors and they are exaclty as they should be.

So the urban myth that 5% ethanol corrodes rubber hoses is 100% BS.

So the urban myth that 5% ethanol corrodes fuel pumps is 100% BS.

So the urban myth that 5% ethanol destroys fuel injectors is 100% BS.

The R33GTST currently has a Power FC running the default maps, which usually means knock over 60 frequently. With Optimax Extreme in it we rarely see knock over 10, the peak was 25 one cold night. Based on the amount of ingition timing retard we have had to use to get the knock below 30 using 98 ron (ANY 98 ron) that is worth 12 rwkw.

Don't get sucked into the ethanol is bad, that may apply to 20% or higher proportions. But 5% is NOT the same story.

So I see no downsides to using Optimax Extreme and I am not the only one. Check around and you will find plenty of guys using it.

:O cheers :bunny:

Ok guys im barging in into this thread.

Ethanol is good you get higher octane level therefore better combustion=more power. But the downside of is, it actually runs hotter and drier on the piston. So its not good for the engine.

By far as for which brand is better for fuel? I personally have tried every single major brand suxh as Bp, shell and mobil. Mobil is the most powerful (snergy 8000), Bp iltimate is the cleanest and a bit better milage and shell is the worse of all.so...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
    • Ceste, jak se mas Marek...sorry I only have english keyboard. Are you a fan of Poland's greatest band ever?   
×
×
  • Create New...