Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

huumm even if you have turbocharged cars..dun put BOVs ...they increase fuel consumption, reduce perfomance and may cause car to stall....

sadly I didn't know these and had one installed in my car...the difference..a stock GTT can go approximately 400km full tank....mine goes only 350km

also apparently stock GTT suppose to have abt 206hp..my best dyno only 200hp...

huumm even if you have turbocharged cars..dun put BOVs ...they increase fuel consumption, reduce perfomance and may cause car to stall....

Not tryin to have a go at you mate but do you mean dont fit BOVs that vents into the atmosphere? Because all turbo skyline comes with a stock BOV already fitted :D . I know that Atmo BOV causes the car to stall but don't know about the performace drainage. Why dont you try and fit your stock BOV back on to your GTT, Nissian wouldnt have fitted them on if they didnt think it would do the car any good would they. Good luck on finding out whats wrong with your car buddy.

Flutter = RICE but yeah whatever floats your boat go for it ahha.

Edited by JUNR34
huumm even if you have turbocharged cars..dun put BOVs ...they increase fuel consumption, reduce perfomance and may cause car to stall....

sadly I didn't know these and had one installed in my car...the difference..a stock GTT can go approximately 400km full tank....mine goes only 350km

also apparently stock GTT suppose to have abt 206hp..my best dyno only 200hp...

Not if theyre set up correctly. skylines did come out of the factory with stock BOV's

huumm even if you have turbocharged cars..dun put BOVs ...they increase fuel consumption, reduce perfomance and may cause car to stall....

This is even more ill-informed than the first post in this thread... :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
×
×
  • Create New...