Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just been looking at my broken box at the mechanics less than an hour ago.

Okay, my reverse selector fork broke, leaving the gear to float back and forth, chipping teeth and sending them floating about and gunking up the works.

The hardening on all the other gears was chipping away.

The input bearing and another one were also shot.

I smashed my Rb20box....still drives.

Typically the problem areas are as follows.

Gearset too weak

Synchros too weak

Bearings too weak

Input shaft too weak

Pretty much the best way to strengthen an RB20 box is to throw it away and buy an RB25 one. Unless you have about 6-7 grand to play with. The standard 20 box can handle 200rwkw day in and day out as long as you don't smash second too hard. Mine went 2 years on 200rwkw and about 6 months on 240 then it was getting hard to select 2, 3, 4 and 5.

I have the RB20 box which you can have for $50..... plus freight unless you wanna pick it up from Brissy.

I smashed my Rb20box....still drives.

Typically the problem areas are as follows.

Gearset too weak

Synchros too weak

Bearings too weak

Input shaft too weak

Pretty much the best way to strengthen an RB20 box is to throw it away and buy an RB25 one. Unless you have about 6-7 grand to play with. The standard 20 box can handle 200rwkw day in and day out as long as you don't smash second too hard. Mine went 2 years on 200rwkw and about 6 months on 240 then it was getting hard to select 2, 3, 4 and 5.

I have the RB20 box which you can have for $50..... plus freight unless you wanna pick it up from Brissy.

What fluid and clutch...i was makign about 190-210rwkws for about 12 months (150,oookms to 165,000kms), then between 215-235, ocassionally 250 odd rwkws for about 8 months with plenty of track work thrown in and my box isnty even makign any funny noises....and i run semi slicks

Im forming the opinion that its a combination of luck, the way i drive and the fact that i only have a baby single plate clutch and am using very good fluid, (not redline...but Castrol) ?!?!?!!

That said i no i wont cheat death forever...but trust me, if the box is 20kgs heavier, thats half a tank of gas, and at the track you can feel when you go out in the morning on a full tank, then syphon 30L from the tank and go back out...the lap times dont lie

Well i can lose 10kgs, and im losign that cause im now a fat fark, forget the car. But i want to keep the air con and all that because it still is a street car, and if it happens to go quick one day, i dont want ppl copping out and saying its stripped...it would be so much easier/cheaper if i didnt care what ppl thought of the car :D

I guess if your not snapping them it doesnt matter. And to be honest most of it is probably your clutch not snapping them.

But if you do start snapping them, you have to start to think. The extra 20kgs might be worth it. If you have to constantly replace or rebuild rb20 boxes, it kinda takes the fun away. That is assuming you are still doing track days for mostly fun, and not some form of paid competition.

That's if the actual gears are heavier... Then you'd also have to work out any differences in design to work out differences in energy lost in the gearing action. Then you'd need to know how much extra was in the actual casing compared to the gears.

Don't think it would be that simple.

My gearbox was tempremental shifting into 2nd. When dead cold it would have a slight choke when engauged the first couple of times then would be fine.

I've now canged the oil with a nulon additive and it engauges from cold alittle smoother but after a couple of spirited shifts that didn't quite engauge 2nd and munched it, it now has become a tempremental gear all the time so now I have to baby second which is begining to grate on me.

I highly suspect 99% of the damage had been caused well before I got my hands on the car and second gear as it cops a fair whack of torque and usage has lost the effectiveness of its synchros so is now crunching on engaugement. Unfortunately there's only one way it can go from here!

Which puts me in the same boat as you guys = 2nd hand gear box (unknown condition)

Reconditon (pricey at best)

Rb25 box (same as GTR, strong but once again

risky and pricey)

hi guys i'm a victim of blowing the rb20box - with 230rwkw clutched it in 3rd and 3rd exploded :S

i've done a 25box conversion and having major issues with clutch slipping, if anyone has any advice please read my thread and some feedback

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...howtopic=117570

thanks

-Matt

I have exploded three of them! This neo r32 one is dying verry fast i think... My old rb25 powered r32 blew two.. I reved it to limiter and grabbed second then it exploded... I pulled it down with dad i slit second gear in half... Not bad boxes,but they dont like rb25 power and torque..

i have an RB30 in my 32 now still with the 20 box and naturally i'm looking to upgrade, I have spoken too PPG and they can rebuild my gerabox with the works but the price is a hefty $6100, I think the 25 box is the way to go!

One of my friends has smashed 3 rb20 boxes with about 250 rwkw.

The weak links in the box appear to be as mentioned above, basically everything in it. The ways it was smashed was:

1. shifting hard into 2nd.

2. near the top of 3rd gear, foot planted. Once the torque/power came in, the gearbox literally just exploded.

cool. just had to put one in a 32 non turbo!

was klnocking at all revs regardless of wich gear.

it turnes out that gay little bearing on the sandwich plate failed.

countershaft.

(bearing race ball cage came apart.) suprise suprise.

so it seems it really is luck of the draw really. concidering a na. rb20 completly stock lunched it lol :wave:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...