Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

just got my car back after it got tuned.

we got 220.3rwkw. i just wanna know if this sounds right?

mods are as follows -

fmic

13-14psi thru gfb boost controller

plazamaman plenum

ces dump

pfc.

walboro fuel pump

thanks for your opinions -

glenn

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/128152-just-off-the-dyno/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

14 psi is a lot for a standard turbo.. too much for mine, for instance

yeah still the standard turbo, injectors and fuel pressure. car was properly strapped and in shoot_6f with correct dyno cell info entered

its quiet possible, i got 220rwkw with a stock turbo on mine, i had the following:

stock turbo

custom exhaust manifold

turbo back 3" exhaust (split dump pipe)

Blitz POD

FMIC

SAFC II

electronic boost controller

we pushed it to just over 1bar on the dyno, but for regular driving i kept it on 12psi (for safety reasons)..

you can see the spiking due to the cheap hybrid electronic boost controller i had at the time, with the new turbosmart valve it actually holds boost a lot better..

post-29255-1154247848.jpg

Edited by MKDR33

Dyno charts don't mean squat. Get a group of cars, at the same dyno, on the same day, then you can compair mods to power.

220 sounds really high for a stock turbo. At 13psi i would expect 180-200rwkw max. There is no rule for max boost on stock turbo, it is basically like playing "Russian roullette". Some turbos can live on 15psi for years without any problem, others will blow on 10psi after a couple of months. Your turbo is more likely to blow at anything over 12psi, but mine lasted for years at 13psi and still was in good condition when i sold it to upgrade to a bigger turbo.

I don't get it, do people like wishing their turbo hangs together all the time? Is the thrill of knowing your turbo could let go at any time and possibly damage your engine that good? Maybe this sort of mentality explains a lot of blown engines/parts? I think i might be onto something here..

Edited by govich
I don't get it, do people like wishing their turbo hangs together all the time? Is the thrill of knowing your turbo could let go at any time and possibly damage your engine that good? Maybe this sort of mentality explains a lot of blown engines/parts? I think i might be onto something here..

yeah...its kind of like mastabating with a cheese grater :happy:

hi guys,

here is the dyno run as requested. i apologise it is only the 219.7rwkw run that we printed off, so i guess i dont have 220kw but close enough. I am not really expecting the turbo to hang on for that long but there is plenty of fuel there so we'll see. If this little exercise has only done one thing thou, it has definatley shown me the advantages of working with your selected tuner to achieve the results you desire.

the chiptorque crew spent a fair share of their free time to get that done for me, and so i must recommend them to all u guys as a fantastic business that will get you the results you want.

cheers

glenn

post-29232-1154259934.jpg

Both dyno sheets posted that have made 220rwkw odd are not holding that 14psi or whatever to peak power...

So... Peak power of 219rwkw was made on roughly 12.6psi and the other dude that made 220rwkw... That was on a shade over 10psi.

So yes.. hrmmmmm, either way its a power figure... Who cares, A real 220rwkw I'd expect a high 12 sec pass with a good driver.

200rwkw.. A low 13. Once again with a decent driver who can drive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...