Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive got an issue that i cannot seem to find an answer that been, if i have 270 rwkws roughly what is the best size tyre i should use at the rear to keep the traction in control, 3037 pro s powah,

235's th tyre shop recommended and i laughed, but honestly what are your guys thoughts

noticed the tyre how would u rate thread, but i have also this isnt really covered much so thats why i am asking

Cheers Guys

Adam

Interesting, damn that means ill have to go 18's >_< i was hoping i would be able to go 17's awell cheers guys but would like to get other views aswell, peaople in that range and more, i believe it should also be a well covered topic as we have other tyre threads but no relation to what rwkws or in gtrs cases awkws they have are producing

Cheers A

600x450-2006081700005.jpg

These badboys on your rear with some 265s would be up to the job!

(I would put 235s on them cause I am an idiot)

It is a set of 4, but I might be willing to go halvies >_<

p.s. you would probably have to roll your guards, but my feeling is that if you don't have to roll your guards your wheels are wrong :P

Edited by Laurence
600x450-2006081700005.jpg

These badboys on your rear with some 265s would be up to the job!

(I would put 235s on them cause I am an idiot)

It is a set of 4, but I might be willing to go halvies :P

p.s. you would probably have to roll your guards, but my feeling is that if you don't have to roll your guards your wheels are wrong :D

you must be one of those hellaflush guys aren't u?? >_<

most of the 17's i have found come only upto the 7.5" dia, able to maybe stretch 245's on there, hmmmm RAYYYYS wheels yep i wouldnt mind to bit outta the price range tho, damnit, the ol saying is desperite times call for desperite measures, damn!

you must be one of those hellaflush guys aren't u?? :)

Hahaha yeah I am, ya busted me :banana:

most of the 17's i have found come only upto the 7.5" dia, able to maybe stretch 245's on there, hmmmm RAYYYYS wheels yep i wouldnt mind to bit outta the price range tho, damnit, the ol saying is desperite times call for desperite measures, damn!

Please no... not the 7.5s

A quick search on Yahoo Auctions bought up this as a rough guide...

GTS25t R33

17×8.0JJ+32 - 225/45

17×9.0JJ+38 - 255/40

For the RUF looks perhaps?

http://page11.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/n40541280

But there are lots out there to suit your taste or budget... but please don't put 7.5J on your nice car!!!

http://search1.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/search...=0jp&mode=2

I live in Japan so I can send this sort of junk over... for some petrol money of course :teehee:

Edited by Laurence

235 or 245s on 17"s should be plenty, still having some cushioning in the tyre wall to keep the handling good. Remembering that optimum suspension design includes consideration of the tyre and its relationship to the spring rates of the car as well i.e. you wouldn't go 18/19s with a 35 profile and stock springs and expect the handling to be good as stock.

Remember you will probably be driving the car in the rain(when it rains again one day) and horsepower isn't the only factor in choosing the width of the tyre, too wide and you could end up aquaplaning in the wet.

Its not fun driving in a torrential downpour and aquaplaning along at 100kms/hr plus. And this was in my R31 with 205/15s on it on the M1 in Brisi, probably not the quality of the tyre you're looking at but still the tyres weren't able to cut through the water. It only happened a couple of times to me but its enough to give you a little scare especially when there's a bit of road camber thrown in.

Of course if your car is lucky enough to be a weekend driver then you can afford to maximise your dry grip over wet grip.

Edited by gts4diehard
I am using federal 595RS tyres in 255..they hold my 255rwkw easily

I think the answer to your question would be, as wide and as good a brand as you can afford and fit under your car

It should be "as narrow and as good a brand as you can afford" Wide tyres are a wank. Look at some supercars they run on 265's or so, i'm pretty sure your skyline should be fine.

supercars running on 265s is a wank mate. The dunlop control tyre is a 280/680/R17 for all supercars(please note that they are a full slick too). Unless your referring to something other then the v8 supercars? In which if you are talking about your top end million dollar street supercars such as a lambo or ferrari then most of them have bigger tyres again.

So Buntas answer is perfectly fine as wide tyres are infact not a wank :)

most of the 17's i have found come only upto the 7.5" dia, able to maybe stretch 245's on there, hmmmm RAYYYYS wheels yep i wouldnt mind to bit outta the price range tho, damnit, the ol saying is desperite times call for desperite measures, damn!

Look harder.

If you can afford to make 270rwkW, you should be able to afford to buy rims and tyres to suit. Don't play if you can't pay.

we use the cheap koyas 5 spoke drift tek rims on the race car they are 17" X 9.5 wide. We fit 280/680/R17 slicks on them no problems. They buldge ever so slightly, barely noticeable. We also fit 265/640/R17 on them no worries, infact they fit very nicely.

Ive got an issue that i cannot seem to find an answer that been, if i have 270 rwkws roughly what is the best size tyre i should use at the rear to keep the traction in control, 3037 pro s powah,

235's th tyre shop recommended and i laughed, but honestly what are your guys thoughts

noticed the tyre how would u rate thread, but i have also this isnt really covered much so thats why i am asking

Cheers Guys

Adam

As others have already said, 255's on a 9" rim (17) is the most readily available combination and will be your "best bang for bucks". I've used 265's and the difference was not noticeable but the extra $80 per tyre over the 255's certainly made a difference to my wallet :P

Edited by shozbot
235 or 245s on 17"s should be plenty, still having some cushioning in the tyre wall to keep the handling good. Remembering that optimum suspension design includes consideration of the tyre and its relationship to the spring rates of the car as well i.e. you wouldn't go 18/19s with a 35 profile and stock springs and expect the handling to be good as stock.

Remember you will probably be driving the car in the rain(when it rains again one day) and horsepower isn't the only factor in choosing the width of the tyre, too wide and you could end up aquaplaning in the wet.

Its not fun driving in a torrential downpour and aquaplaning along at 100kms/hr plus. And this was in my R31 with 205/15s on it on the M1 in Brisi, probably not the quality of the tyre you're looking at but still the tyres weren't able to cut through the water. It only happened a couple of times to me but its enough to give you a little scare especially when there's a bit of road camber thrown in.

Of course if your car is lucky enough to be a weekend driver then you can afford to maximise your dry grip over wet grip.

I wouldn't exactly call the stock R33 suspension optimum, handling is a bit soggy with the stockies on it. I've got 18's on mine (225/40's on the front & 265/35's rear) & it's firmed it up nicely without making it real harsh. It also as a result greatly improved the handling 3 fold because of the better compound tyres, the fact they were wider & lower profile which gave much better cornering response.

I do recommed that you go for quality over width & profile though - I was originally going to get 17's but my rims almost literally fell in my lap for a price I just couldn't refuse. A friend of mine upgraded the tyres to some from the originals on his S14 & went from 205's to 225's & the diffence due to the quality & grip was night & day, far more than just what the width increase could account for.

If you were sliding like crazy in the wet on 205's then it's probably because either the tyre compound was crap or your hoops were looking rather more like slicks than street tyres. Tyre pressure & suspension type & settings (live rear axle like R31's have isn't exactly the best for grip) also contribute. I have minimal issues with wet weather grip & I don't have the best rubber around on the back either (Hankook K104's, good middle range tyre), would have gone for higher quality again if I had the money at the time.

Oh it's my daily too.

Edited by JazzaR33

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
    • Dang, those BBS are so nice! 
×
×
  • Create New...