Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, seeing as iv just copped my 2nd canary in 2 weeks and an epa i want to get rid of my plates and go full plumb back and airbox setup with around 250+kw at the wheels. How many of you have done it? would it still work?

Iv seen the mines r34 with 400kw running airbox and the z tune running air box. Would it be possible with the rb25det?

thanks. Phill

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/
Share on other sites

yes it is apparently, but everywhere i read you have to "make up a larger feed for the stock airbox". when i figure this out i will share but it is not easy in the r33 engine bay if you have intercooler piping in the way of the original

Edit: anyone done so? pics?

Edited by jeffworld2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2755768
Share on other sites

260kw with an apexi panel filter. Cut a 3" hole into the airbox and run a pipe with a bellmouth to my front bar, from which i have heard is legel.

im also still running the metal intake pipe which will be plumbed back with the bov and rocker cover breather like stock. Would that work?

Edited by LTHLRB
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2755833
Share on other sites

I just changed back to stock air box...

my power levels are he same if not more than yours...seems to run fine

I'm using the stock intake also...as I couldn't work out a neat path for the 3" pipe I had run for my pod filter..

is quite as..and seems to run fine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2755885
Share on other sites

i use the airbox.. i was also worried bout the size of the snorkel..

ive cut the front side out of the top of the airbox now.. so theres a big hole in it.. so the air can go in via the snorkel.. or via the hole at the front.

The area the airbox is in is pretty well shielded by the stock pipes (if u use a blitz style intercooler) so it keeps alot of the hot air out. when i stick my hand in the airbox the air is kinda cool, so i dont think its letting to much hot air in..

oh ya she also gained 4kw on the dyno :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2755906
Share on other sites

260kw with an apexi panel filter. Cut a 3" hole into the airbox and run a pipe with a bellmouth to my front bar, from which i have heard is legel.

im also still running the metal intake pipe which will be plumbed back with the bov and rocker cover breather like stock. Would that work?

The hole you intend to cut must be in the top half of the std air box, above the filter (the lid). If you cut the hole on the bottom of the air box, and use a pipe to dirrect air from the bumper to the box, the engine will be sucking in unfiltered and un-metered (if still using afm) air; Bad news for turbo and engine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2755932
Share on other sites

ahh alright, i was going to cut before the filter, so cold air goes into the filter then afm then turbo, is that the right way to cut? like where the standard air duct it, just make it 3" and run the pipe to the front bar.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2755959
Share on other sites

I too am using the standard airbox (cant stand the sound of a pod, makes the car sound like its on boost 24/7) but i have modified the airbox a little bit by removing the baffling/sound deadning stuff and also cutting out some of the inside of the airbox to make the airflow a bit smoother.

Underneath the baffling stuff is some plastic squares which are part of the mould of the airbox, when the baffling is removed the squares are right in the path of the airway which would slow the air down quite a bit if you think about it (you will see what i mean in the pics bellow), i cut the squares out of the airbox so it basically gives the air a smooth path to follow and directs the air straight into the air filter (instead of hitting the squares and slowing down), i also taped around the intake snorkel (the part of the airbox were the air intake attaches to) with some thick duck tape so it creats a better seal between the intake and the airbox snorkel (without the ducktape the intake was very loose on the airbox and didnt seal very well which would possibly let air escape.

Doing all of this might sound a bit stupid to some people but anything that improves ariflow is good in my books:)

In these pics you can see the difference between the squares in the airbox and the ones i have cut out, i also gave it a sand so it made it smooth (it dosent look to appealing but you dont see it anyway)

JaysR33027.jpg

JaysR33028.jpg

JaysR33029.jpg

JaysR33030.jpg

JaysR33032.jpg

And here you can see the duck tape wrapped around the inlet snorkel which also dosent look very good but you dont see it anyway lol

JaysR33031.jpg

JaysR33033.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2756268
Share on other sites

i made a box myself, used about 4mm thick pvc plastic sheet i got from a plastics shop, made all the bends with a heat gun, and plastic welded the corner joints..

as for piping just cut out the hole with jigsaw, and for cold air hav a pipe from my front bar going in2 the bottom of the box

all up cost me $7.50 for the plastic sheet and $8 for black spray can so it looks legit

heres a pic:

post-31419-1166350662.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2756348
Share on other sites

i made a box myself, used about 4mm thick pvc plastic sheet i got from a plastics shop, made all the bends with a heat gun, and plastic welded the corner joints..

as for piping just cut out the hole with jigsaw, and for cold air hav a pipe from my front bar going in2 the bottom of the box

all up cost me $7.50 for the plastic sheet and $8 for black spray can so it looks legit

heres a pic:

Nice work.

Still considered a modification though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2756379
Share on other sites

i made a box myself, used about 4mm thick pvc plastic sheet i got from a plastics shop, made all the bends with a heat gun, and plastic welded the corner joints..

as for piping just cut out the hole with jigsaw, and for cold air hav a pipe from my front bar going in2 the bottom of the box

all up cost me $7.50 for the plastic sheet and $8 for black spray can so it looks legit

heres a pic:

yeh well done bro it looks pretty good but how does that plastic hold up in hot days or even normal days?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2756743
Share on other sites

The hole you intend to cut must be in the top half of the std air box, above the filter (the lid). If you cut the hole on the bottom of the air box, and use a pipe to dirrect air from the bumper to the box, the engine will be sucking in unfiltered and un-metered (if still using afm) air; Bad news for turbo and engine.

i can't see how it would be unmetered mate. think about what you are saying. the air goes into the airbox, then through the air flow meter how is that unmetered?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/147671-air-box-setup/#findComment-2757054
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...