Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've done quite a bit of searching and have not found clear answers as yet.

On the provision that the professional inspection/comp test goes well tomorrow I'll be taking ownership of a Series II 33 GTR V-Spec (Yay for me). It currently has a Turbo Back system and an aftermarket FMIC core but that's all, stock boost, no management, not even air filters.

I'd like to do something intake wise and have come down to either Apexi Panel filters or the Apexi Power Intake Kit. If using the Intake Kit, have people been able to find a good cold air box that still uses the snorkel? If using the panel filters, is there much of a gain? I assume cleaning/servicing them is simply a matter of blowing them out with a compressor? How long do they last?

In addition, can some GTR owners relay their experiences with boosting the stock turbo's as I've read plenty of horror stories of turbo's letting go and the engine inhaling ceramic dust - not pretty.

Given I'm coming from a GTST with a turbo back exhaust and POD/CAI only, the GTR is certainly a step up power wise. Having said that, we all love to tinker and get more power and with this in mind I was contemplating going PowerFC and some Cam Gears and possibly some more boost at that stage, dependent on what people say about boosting the stock turbos. With this setup, and the above mentioned filters, what kind of power figure would I be looking at on stock boost and on say 12-14(I read 14 is the absolute max for stock turbo's?)

All info appreciated but I'm particularly interested in hearing from other GTR owners who have done the above.

Cheers :ninja:

Edited by ActionDan
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/148218-gtr-performance-qs/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On the provision that the professional inspection/comp test goes well tomorrow I'll be taking ownership of a Series II 33 GTR V-Spec (Yay for me). It currently has a Turbo Back system and an aftermarket FMIC core but that's all, stock boost, no management, not even air filters.

I'd like to do something intake wise and have come down to either Apexi Panel filters or the Apexi Power Intake Kit. If using the Intake Kit, have people been able to find a good cold air box that still uses the snorkel? If using the panel filters, is there much of a gain? I assume cleaning/servicing them is simply a matter of blowing them out with a compressor? How long do they last?

Chuck a K & N filter at it. They are fine for this sort of hp. Service the thing every 5000kms or so, depends on how dusty it is around where you are.

In addition, can some GTR owners relay their experiences with boosting the stock turbo's as I've read plenty of horror stories of turbo's letting go and the engine inhaling ceramic dust - not pretty.

Stay below 1 bar boost & the things will live a long & happy life.

Given I'm coming from a GTST with a turbo back exhaust and POD/CAI only, the GTR is certainly a step up power wise. Having said that, we all love to tinker and get more power and with this in mind I was contemplating going PowerFC and some Cam Gears and possibly some more boost at that stage, dependent on what people say about boosting the stock turbos. With this setup, and the above mentioned filters, what kind of power figure would I be looking at on stock boost and on say 12-14(I read 14 is the absolute max for stock turbo's?)

Just over 300rwhp - maybe up to 330. Depends on the dyno/day/motor/tune etc etc etc.

I'd like to do something intake wise and have come down to either Apexi Panel filters or the Apexi Power Intake Kit. If using the Intake Kit, have people been able to find a good cold air box that still uses the snorkel? If using the panel filters, is there much of a gain? I assume cleaning/servicing them is simply a matter of blowing them out with a compressor? How long do they last?

Neither. Apexi panel filters are expensive and rubbish and are not cleanable as they are just paper type. Pod filters are a waste of time money and power on a street car. Z-tune - Airbox, Mines GTR - Airbox. I personally am making 300awkw with a K&N panel filter in the stock airbox..................

K&N panel filter are cleanable and have a long lifetime or if you want to give them a try get a Splitfire panel filter which looks remarkably similar to a K&N to me but about half the price.

Cheers for the feedback. Looks like K & N Panel is the go, I'm currently using a K & N Pod and like the cleanable nature.

With regards to boost on the stock turbos. Could the car be safely tuned for 14 or will this drastically reduce the life of the turbos? I get that you're saying don't exceed a bar but if the car is tuned for an even 14psi, will this cause issues? I understand it's a much of a muchness question in that all turbo's will eventually fail and that they could go at any time at any PSI etc. Just looking for a happy medium.

The power figure mentioned, 300rwhp, which is around 225rwkw's, is that on stock boost or with boost added? I was under the impression that on around 14psi they make around 250rwkw's with a tune and cam gears.

Cheers

Edited by ActionDan
Cheers for the feedback. Looks like K & N Panel is the go, I'm currently using a K & N Pod and like the cleanable nature.

With regards to boost on the stock turbos. Could the car be safely tuned for 14 or will this drastically reduce the life of the turbos? I get that you're saying don't exceed a bar but if the car is tuned for an even 14psi, will this cause issues? I understand it's a much of a muchness question in that all turbo's will eventually fail and that they could go at any time at any PSI etc. Just looking for a happy medium.

The power figure mentioned, 300rwhp, which is around 225rwkw's, is that on stock boost or with boost added? I was under the impression that on around 14psi they make around 250rwkw's with a tune and cam gears.

Cheers

The ceramic turbos fail suddenly - basically the turbine (exhaust wheel) falls off them & spits blades back into the motor. 14# is safe.

300rwhp is at about 13# to 14#.

Figures can lie & liers can figure. People tend to talk up their hp numbers as if 5 or even 10 rwhp will make a spit of difference. 250rwkW is 333rwhp. Which is probably about right for a good RB26 with the stuff you mentioned.

So if I'm not in a position to be forking over 3k+ for N1's then I should probably leave the boost at stock levels, add some cam gears and get a safe tune for reliable power rather than more power but less safety. I've heard of people blowing turbo's on RB25's after 12ps which I thought were ceramic as well (mines a Series II) but never of the engine ingesting the blades, why is this such a problem on RB26's? If it's such a huge issue why do people even run 14 if the turbo's are so sensitive?

So if I'm not in a position to be forking over 3k+ for N1's then I should probably leave the boost at stock levels, add some cam gears and get a safe tune for reliable power rather than more power but less safety. I've heard of people blowing turbo's on RB25's after 12ps which I thought were ceramic as well (mines a Series II) but never of the engine ingesting the blades, why is this such a problem on RB26's? If it's such a huge issue why do people even run 14 if the turbo's are so sensitive?

Ok, if you haven't already picked up on what I am trying to say. 14# is safe. My R32 has been running that for three years.

RB25's are not the same motor, so to be honest who give a rats about them?

Ingesting blades isn't a problem particular to RB26's. It is what happens when your turbine goes from 100,000rpm to 0 in the blink of an eye. The stuff has to go somewhere & as often as not it goes into the motor. It happens on steel wheel turbos occassionally too, but less frequently because their failure mode is less sudden.

People will always push the limits of the car/motor. There are nuggets out there boasting how much rwhp they get on such things as stock fuel pumps, injectors, afm's, turbos, cams etc etc etc. For some stupid reason people think it is cool to say I got n hundred rwhp & I am still running a stock warbler. I have no idea why that is other than to suggest that some people are, infact, complete uckwits. :ninja:

LoL, OK point taken, 14 is OK.

Is there much merit in an oil cooler? Cooler would have to be better but I'm thinking it might be overkill on a street car. I also like the ide aof an oil relocation kit as the filter location on an RB is a pain in the ass if you wanna do it without spilling oil everywhere >.<

LoL, OK point taken, 14 is OK.

Is there much merit in an oil cooler? Cooler would have to be better but I'm thinking it might be overkill on a street car. I also like the ide aof an oil relocation kit as the filter location on an RB is a pain in the ass if you wanna do it without spilling oil everywhere >.<

For a street car, probably not. If you go to a track, yes.

You will spill oil on the front diff when you change it. You can either get used to it or get a relocator.

I was contemplating going to the track a few times but not super hard sessions but still, cooler oil can't hurt.

I've spilt enough oil on the cross member in my 33 to know it shits me to tears when it happens so a relocater might be the go.

For the record, is anyone running Pod's with a cold air box using the stock snorkel?

Edited by ActionDan
Is there much merit in an oil cooler? Cooler would have to be better but I'm thinking it might be overkill on a street car.

That depends on how your drive. Any track work or extended runs on country roads in summer def fit an oil cooler.

1 bar boost, cam gears, and powerFC, you'll have a very nice power package.

Air filters aren't a big deal, you'll barely notice anything if at all, get what you want. I run stock airbox as well. A good exaust makes more of a difference.

Oil cooler only really needed if your going to give it real stick - ie track or hard time on twisty roads. Keep an eye on your oil temp, if you can get it above 100-110 on the street you're doing well and should probably get an oil cooler.

Is there an official figure on what boost they run with the restrictor removed? I've read various texts but 14-15psi seems to be the norm, is this accurate as it would save buying an EBC or is there more control/more benefit of an EBC? I'm thinking would be good to be able to wind the boost down a bit on a hot day/track day if I'm gonna give it some stick.

Edited by ActionDan
Is there an official figure on what boost they run with the restrictor removed? I've read various texts but 14-15psi seems to be the norm, is this accurate as it would save buying an EBC or is there more control/more benefit of an EBC? I'm thinking would be good to be able to wind the boost down a bit on a hot day/track day if I'm gonna give it some stick.

No there isn't a figure & no those quoted aren't accurate. It varies quite a bit from car to car & depends on the condition of the stock bleed valve.

An EBC is more accurate than a bleed valve. If you want an adjustable bleed valve Turbosmart make a good, cheap one.

If you are going to a track day don't wind down the boost, put some pro strength Nulon Octane Booster in the fuel tank. What is the point of having a motor tuned for useful hp only to turn it off when you would really like to be using it?

Valid point, just throwing some ideas around. It's weird but for some reason I see the GTR as being so much more delicate than my GTS25T in how I will probably treat it but in reality, it's probably a crap load stronger.

You obviously have no idea what your talking about.

Stock Airbox'ed GTR's down here are making 350rwkw without an issue, so i dont see what was wrong with sewids comments, they more accurate than some wasteland thread

I'm still keen to know if anyone is running Dual Pods, not necessarily Apexi ones, and using a Cold Air Box using the stock snorkle. I have this setup atm and it works well and sounds excellent. Given the cost difference though, I think Panels might be the go.

Smart guy aren't ya. So why don't you tell me how pod filters are better than an enclosed factory airbox on a street car? You'd know right because you've tested back to back right.... right.

I personally have tested back to back and i know a good amount of people who have high powered GTRs and agree with me.

I mean why would you even consider pods on a street GTR?

- Attracts defects

- Increase air intake temps

- Cost more to buy and more to buy the inevitable cold air partition you need to install to stop the air intake temp rise

The alternative is the factory airbox which plenty of people making more power than you use and have no problems at all. Doesn't attract the police and keeps intake temps down due to being enclosed and drawing in air through the standard snorkels (or snorkels in the case of GTR).

But hey if you like to throw lots of money at a colorful wang extension instead of putting your money into actually useful modifications who am I to judge...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...