Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah but they must have got a ve that the bugs went on holiday for that day

if they had to fix the cock up then it would be a different story

note

yes some cars have problems but the ve takes the cake

Edited by boot_it
  • 8 months later...
its still a holden....crappadore

hahahahahahahahahaha :)

I learnt how to drive on a VS crappadore. I thought it was strong and torquey, with plenty of room and comfort for the price. Newish holdens aren't bombs,that's definite, but on a level playing field against European and Japanese cars it really lacks an edge- both in performance (mainly everything but straight line grunt) and sophistication. The VS didn't turn heads like my beautiful R33 does, and it's older!

But i've never thought highly of Holden anyway. I drove my first Skyline and was astonished at how far ahead the Japs are. Comparing a 1995 model crappadore to a 1993 R33, the Nissan wins it for me. Better technology, more power, better looks, strength. The only thing the Holden has over the Skyline is more rear seat room for the kiddies. But if you have a family you're not really looking for a sports car, or something with tuneability. You're looking for a family car.

Ah, well no one cares about you because that's boring.

+1 Skylines

i have owned a commodore, a falcon, a 180sx, a skyline and 2 magnas (plus a few other cars). i must say that handling wise the imports win hands down....... until you hit a rough, typical australian outback road. then the softer suspension of the aussie cars does help quite a bit. i have been on roads where even at the speed limit the stiffer sprung japanese cars will walk across the road but the aussie cars will soak it up nicely.

but they are designed for different purposes. the skyline is a family sports car. the aussie cars (well the sports versions like the vrx magna, xr falcons and ss commodores) that get slight handling upgrades are sporty family cars. also the majority of roads in japan are in better condition than the majority of aussie roads.

if you have a family and want something that is going to be cheap to run (all running costs from fuel to insurance, etc) and plan on keeping it for years and years and do plenty of kms then a ford or holden will be fine. you don't have to run it on premium fuel so that cuts your costs down a bit, repairs are generally cheaper, and they will do well over 300,000kms easily on a motor, where as you don't see too many healthy japanese motors with that many kms on them.

I tend to dissagree. :(

The ol RB30 is a jap motor and no different to the rb26, 25 or 20. They push well over 300,000km's without issues providing they are maintained and not stupidly fiddled with which results in broken ring lands.

The thing is who keeps their jap car long enough to push over 300,000km's; or if they do own their car for such a time leaves their jap car standard; its usually pushing more 2x the power and driven hard. Unlike the family commodore or ford.

I wouldn't exactly say fords and holdens are reliable to well over 300k;

The inlaws VN commodore bought from new required a rebuild a little over 200,000km's; graaandpa and nanna's EA ford required a rebuild close to 300k and went through 2 gearbox's each before they hit 400k; they had an EA ford each and live out in the country so lots of open road driving.

They now have an AU and AU II both of which are starting to have trans problems a little over 200,000km's. :)

Then there's a mate of mine which bought an EB ford; crank end float required a rebuild before 100k; my old man bought an EA Fairmont back when they were new; same thing crank endfloat before 100k and also required a rebuild.

I owned a VL years back; had 80k on the clock basically new. When I sold it I had done 320,000km's in it still the std motor perfect compression; the auto trans had only just been ripped out of it for a manual but was still working fine. I was lucky not to crack a head especially as I thrashed the absolute crap out of it, as you tend to do when your young. :)

I then bought a VS 5ltr 5speed commodore; did the usual cam, ecu and exhaust made just under 2x the power at the wheels than it did from factory. Within a few weeks it smashed a gearbox; then smashed a diff then broke the rear subframe which caused the rear to sit on the ground with 45degree neg camber.

Give these new fords/holdens a little time and lets see how they hold up.

The new ford/holden motors are nothing like the solid old 202's or 250 ford motors back in the day. :)

yeah, i forgot about the rb30.

and i was more talking about motors rather than gearboxes and diffs. sure they need a bit of upkeep. i think part of the problem with them is that a lot of people never service them. most will just drive it till it dies. but i know plenty of commodores and falcons that have done over 250,000kms on the standard box and diff and they are still running fine.

Maybe the problem is with factory servicing. The grandparents fords were both serviced by ford as are the new ones.

The VN was (until the motor let go) servced by holden.

The parents 100series v8 landcruiser is serviced by Toyota and after 30,000km's has developed a lifter tick on cold morning starts. :S

They claim they use really good oil; castrol magnatec. lol

Castrol; some really good oil that stuff. :S Claim a grp 3 base stock is a 100% synthetic. top work castrol. :)

Makes me wonder what their lesser non synethic/semi synthetic oils use; grp 2. :S

Within the cab industry the VN/VP's were known as buckets of poo with gearbox's and motors letting go well before the fords.

both the ea's and vn's were the start of a new era too. the vl was an in between model. it had styling based off the vk and the nissan motor (which is loosely based of an earlier motor anyway), but the vn and ea were the start of a new era. the vn was the first v6 holden used, and the ea was thr first of the 3.9L. ford had problems with batteries exploding (so they gave them a CAI) and had problems with head gaskets going (i know mine did a few, but the bore itself looked like new) amoungst other things. then the later model eb's got the 4.0L and they didn't have as many problems.

The fords had quite a few problems for a while there.

All of the ford bottom ends up to the EL had issues with early failure resulting in crank end float.

The solution was to drop the EL crank in to the EA-EF's.

The EF's still had problems of breaking headbolt/studs. So it really wasn't until the EL's they got it right so to speak.

The thing is who keeps their jap car long enough to push over 300,000km's
My AE86 cracked 420,000kms. 4AC toyota goldness!
Interesting that the cab industry hasnt embraced the VE to much of an extent yet

I'm starting to see more and more of them... but give it a year. Cabbies here seem to be loyal to ford as they come with the Gas option from factory, wheras Holdens have to be retrofitted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...