Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah but they must have got a ve that the bugs went on holiday for that day

if they had to fix the cock up then it would be a different story

note

yes some cars have problems but the ve takes the cake

Edited by boot_it
  • 8 months later...
its still a holden....crappadore

hahahahahahahahahaha :)

I learnt how to drive on a VS crappadore. I thought it was strong and torquey, with plenty of room and comfort for the price. Newish holdens aren't bombs,that's definite, but on a level playing field against European and Japanese cars it really lacks an edge- both in performance (mainly everything but straight line grunt) and sophistication. The VS didn't turn heads like my beautiful R33 does, and it's older!

But i've never thought highly of Holden anyway. I drove my first Skyline and was astonished at how far ahead the Japs are. Comparing a 1995 model crappadore to a 1993 R33, the Nissan wins it for me. Better technology, more power, better looks, strength. The only thing the Holden has over the Skyline is more rear seat room for the kiddies. But if you have a family you're not really looking for a sports car, or something with tuneability. You're looking for a family car.

Ah, well no one cares about you because that's boring.

+1 Skylines

i have owned a commodore, a falcon, a 180sx, a skyline and 2 magnas (plus a few other cars). i must say that handling wise the imports win hands down....... until you hit a rough, typical australian outback road. then the softer suspension of the aussie cars does help quite a bit. i have been on roads where even at the speed limit the stiffer sprung japanese cars will walk across the road but the aussie cars will soak it up nicely.

but they are designed for different purposes. the skyline is a family sports car. the aussie cars (well the sports versions like the vrx magna, xr falcons and ss commodores) that get slight handling upgrades are sporty family cars. also the majority of roads in japan are in better condition than the majority of aussie roads.

if you have a family and want something that is going to be cheap to run (all running costs from fuel to insurance, etc) and plan on keeping it for years and years and do plenty of kms then a ford or holden will be fine. you don't have to run it on premium fuel so that cuts your costs down a bit, repairs are generally cheaper, and they will do well over 300,000kms easily on a motor, where as you don't see too many healthy japanese motors with that many kms on them.

I tend to dissagree. :(

The ol RB30 is a jap motor and no different to the rb26, 25 or 20. They push well over 300,000km's without issues providing they are maintained and not stupidly fiddled with which results in broken ring lands.

The thing is who keeps their jap car long enough to push over 300,000km's; or if they do own their car for such a time leaves their jap car standard; its usually pushing more 2x the power and driven hard. Unlike the family commodore or ford.

I wouldn't exactly say fords and holdens are reliable to well over 300k;

The inlaws VN commodore bought from new required a rebuild a little over 200,000km's; graaandpa and nanna's EA ford required a rebuild close to 300k and went through 2 gearbox's each before they hit 400k; they had an EA ford each and live out in the country so lots of open road driving.

They now have an AU and AU II both of which are starting to have trans problems a little over 200,000km's. :)

Then there's a mate of mine which bought an EB ford; crank end float required a rebuild before 100k; my old man bought an EA Fairmont back when they were new; same thing crank endfloat before 100k and also required a rebuild.

I owned a VL years back; had 80k on the clock basically new. When I sold it I had done 320,000km's in it still the std motor perfect compression; the auto trans had only just been ripped out of it for a manual but was still working fine. I was lucky not to crack a head especially as I thrashed the absolute crap out of it, as you tend to do when your young. :)

I then bought a VS 5ltr 5speed commodore; did the usual cam, ecu and exhaust made just under 2x the power at the wheels than it did from factory. Within a few weeks it smashed a gearbox; then smashed a diff then broke the rear subframe which caused the rear to sit on the ground with 45degree neg camber.

Give these new fords/holdens a little time and lets see how they hold up.

The new ford/holden motors are nothing like the solid old 202's or 250 ford motors back in the day. :)

yeah, i forgot about the rb30.

and i was more talking about motors rather than gearboxes and diffs. sure they need a bit of upkeep. i think part of the problem with them is that a lot of people never service them. most will just drive it till it dies. but i know plenty of commodores and falcons that have done over 250,000kms on the standard box and diff and they are still running fine.

Maybe the problem is with factory servicing. The grandparents fords were both serviced by ford as are the new ones.

The VN was (until the motor let go) servced by holden.

The parents 100series v8 landcruiser is serviced by Toyota and after 30,000km's has developed a lifter tick on cold morning starts. :S

They claim they use really good oil; castrol magnatec. lol

Castrol; some really good oil that stuff. :S Claim a grp 3 base stock is a 100% synthetic. top work castrol. :)

Makes me wonder what their lesser non synethic/semi synthetic oils use; grp 2. :S

Within the cab industry the VN/VP's were known as buckets of poo with gearbox's and motors letting go well before the fords.

both the ea's and vn's were the start of a new era too. the vl was an in between model. it had styling based off the vk and the nissan motor (which is loosely based of an earlier motor anyway), but the vn and ea were the start of a new era. the vn was the first v6 holden used, and the ea was thr first of the 3.9L. ford had problems with batteries exploding (so they gave them a CAI) and had problems with head gaskets going (i know mine did a few, but the bore itself looked like new) amoungst other things. then the later model eb's got the 4.0L and they didn't have as many problems.

The fords had quite a few problems for a while there.

All of the ford bottom ends up to the EL had issues with early failure resulting in crank end float.

The solution was to drop the EL crank in to the EA-EF's.

The EF's still had problems of breaking headbolt/studs. So it really wasn't until the EL's they got it right so to speak.

The thing is who keeps their jap car long enough to push over 300,000km's
My AE86 cracked 420,000kms. 4AC toyota goldness!
Interesting that the cab industry hasnt embraced the VE to much of an extent yet

I'm starting to see more and more of them... but give it a year. Cabbies here seem to be loyal to ford as they come with the Gas option from factory, wheras Holdens have to be retrofitted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...