Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If everything runs to plan my RB25/30 will be complete this weekend. Last night bolted to top part of the RB20DET plenum onto the bottom part of the RB25DE plenum. Had i got look at it and noticed that on the runners of the RB25DE, the water jacket that runs alongs the plenum has a bung in the end of it, whereas the RB20DET has a nipple. Do i have to drill and tap this and pit a nipple in it, or can the hose be ran as where?

Sorry to ask the same question again...kinda hoping that someone may have since stumbled accross the info im after :confused:

What is the weight of the std RB30 rod, also the piston weight (separate weights pls)

Is there any difference between the R31, VL series I & II rods, and other than Argo and Carrillo are there any other manufacturers of RB30 rods.

Reading the early pages of the thread it seems that eveyone is running prep'd std rods, assuming 7,500rpm what is the SAFE limit of these puppies, figures of 350rwkws seem to be thrown around provided tune is close to the mark. Whatever the rule of thumb figure is i imagine that takes into account the lighter forged pistons ppl are running:confused:

Sorry about all the questions. :Oops: and yes i read the forst 35 pages of this thread last night :(

got my eagle 4340 chromoly forged h-beam rods today, they are a work of art!!! THere are a few mods that need to be done to accomodate them but they are nice and they are a better price than argo or carillos....i'll post a pic!!!!

stock rod= from memory its been a while since i weighed them but i think they were 525 grams.

the eagles are 590 grams or something and are rated at 130hp per rod!!!

got my eagle 4340 chromoly forged h-beam rods today, they are a work of art!!! THere are a few mods that need to be done to accomodate them but they are nice and they are a better price than argo or carillos....i'll post a pic!!!!

stock rod= from memory its been a while since i weighed them but i think they were 525 grams.

the eagles are 590 grams or something and are rated at 130hp per rod!!!

Have you checked the thickness of the big end on the rod to make sure it fits the width of the big end journal on the crank? You should also test an RB big end bearing in the rod for entrapment. :)

Hi S13drifter...

thanks for confirming that the eagle rods are heavier than stock. I was told this a while ago and asked the question but no one knew for certain.

i just hope that they will be bloody worth it in the long run!

and i hope the extra weight doesnt affect things too much in terms of making power :Oops:

SK i think thats where these rods are modified... The RB30 rods are actually Chev 6" small block rods ??

YEah they are the right width as they have been machined to take nissan gudgeons at the little end, so the little end bush is now 21mm instead of 22.78 that a chev is... and the big end requires the crank to be ground around 35 thou i think.... i haven't measured it all yet cause i only got them today, but due to the grinding i dont think they will take the nissan bearings rather the chev ones im unsure untill i look at it all or maybe even another bearing like a speciallised type from clevite 77 ect... and yes i have no doubt they are chev 6 inch small journal rods but if the shoe fits!!!

I have seen these used in another build ie. another rb30 but not twin cam head... they are slightly longer than stock and require the use of a metal head gasket ( not my best friend but will still work) of about 40 thou or 1mm to obtain an optimal quench of around .45thou!..

Cheers, Daniel

I think you will find that they are basically 6.017" VG30 rods (RB30 is 6") with the wider big end and bushed for 21 mm gudgeons (VG30 has the bigger 22 mm gudgeon). The Chevy rod (being for a V8) is offset to allow for the shared big end journals. It is possible that Eagle are machining a Chevy rod, but I reckon the VG30 is a better starting point.

Good to see Eagle make a "small step for them" and a "large step for us". They are a good rod maker, you should be happy with the results.

As for weights, weigh the pistons and rod together and compare that with the standard piston and rod. I think you will find an advantage there. :)

As for weights, weigh the pistons and rod together and compare that with the standard piston and rod.  I think you will find an advantage there. :)

Yeh was thinking that but if i dont need the rods for the added strength they offer, i want everything as light as possible...no point having rods capable of 450rwkw if im only making 350rwkws, especially if it means paying more and having extra weight....is there a gaping hole in my logic?

I dunno if it's a gaping hole, but personally I'd prefer to have that extra tolerance headroom on the rods, rather than getting to 340rwkw and wondering when something may or may not let go. :rofl:

Ability to rev slightly harder/faster Vs Peace of mind. :)

I also have a question about aftermarket rods.

Has anyone tried or heard feedback on Crower rods.

They make them for the rb30 http://www.modyourcar.com.au/product_info....roducts_id=3007

Also been considering Arias forged pistons. http://www.modyourcar.com.au/product_info....products_id=528

Are there any other things I should be asking in regards to the above parts?

SK- My own RB31DET has 268 inlet and 272 exhaust both with 10.5mm lift.

What kind of power do these cams make?, is it ok for a daily driver?

You are no doubt aware that RB25's have hydraulic followers and that you would be limited to ~256 degree cams with ~9.2 mm lift to retain the VVT. This means no change in valve springs is neccessary.

What power is possible with the above cams mentioned?.

PS: I have all the support systems etc..

when you guys are making the RB30DET's from the RB25DET's are you adapting the RB25 side mount oil cooler ?

Apparently the rb30 has a one way valve in the way instead of a proper bush that the rb25 uses to pass the oil to the oil cooler which is cooled by the cooling system??

My RB30DET is going to be modded to accept the oil cooler as oil temps in RB30DET's is definatly something that needs to be watched.

Anyone else done this or know anyone to do it with their RB30DET Hybrids ?

Im just gunna fit the grex kit ive got to cover the oil issue (only really need it if you wanna do some track work)

As for rods...well ive asked this question before....decide what you want the car for. I set my limit at 350rwkw. Std rods, ive been told, will hold. I couldnt justify spending another $1800 - $2000 on top of the $5500 ive already spent on the rest of the motor, just to push it past the 350 limit.

It is a RWD car, and i can already see huge traction problems...Id rather spend the extra dosh on tyres and suspension mods to get the 350rwkw to the ground first :)

when you guys are making the RB30DET's from the RB25DET's are you adapting the RB25 side mount oil cooler ?

Apparently the rb30 has a one way valve in the way instead of a proper bush that the rb25 uses to pass the oil to the oil cooler which is cooled by the cooling system??

My RB30DET is going to be modded to accept the oil cooler as oil temps in RB30DET's is definatly something that needs to be watched.

Anyone else done this or know anyone to do it with their RB30DET Hybrids ?

Just need to fit the Skyline part from another RB block so that the adaptor seals.

I have done this. I have a HKS oil cooler with remote filter mount etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...