Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 212
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i dont think there trying to meet stats/quota's i think there trying to tell us were not welcome anymore :)

Pick up any newspaper or watch any media report.

It's either 1000 impounded cars or a list of how many cars impounded in each suburb etc. No doubt the larger numbers they have the more likely the public will believe that the police are making a difference.

Seeing as the police were under fire due to what happened at noble park, they are trying to restore their reputation in the public by having a "Mega Blitz" and easiest way to increase numbers is at these events.

Sorry shouts of entrapment are just plain wrong.

vicpol didn't sell or fit any modified parts, they also didn't suggest or encourage that it be done. They didn't make johnnos commy have bald tyres or cause any other rwc issues....So they didn't invite the people that they also didn't sell/fit/encourage to modify the vehicles of to the event that they didn't organise.

Yep that surely sounds a lot unlike entrapment to me.

coralling or hearding maybe :)

They did go to a place where they new a large number of offenders may be found instead of driving around aimlessly pulling over randoms or setting up on a highway? YES.. Geez seems like a logical use of resources for a good result when you look at in that light hey.

Stop pointing blame and calling shenaniggans

mate i dunno wats wrong with some of you guys...

khunjeng and a few others saying grab a tissue - why don't u lube that tissue and wipe your rim cos ure getting f*kd and you're loving it.

lol, good call :huh:

All those agreeing with the Police - again you are part of the Problem, not the solution. Its people with your mentality that introduce or suggest these harsh penalties.

whats amazing is that some of the fines people receive for mods are completely disproportionate to their so called offence :laugh:

general petty criminals often get fined less. :)

HOONS do not = MODIFIED CARS

Try telling that to the average stupid public. When people at my work found out i drive a modified skyline they straight away made a link to me being a hoon :)

Just so you all know.....as taken from NS.com....

"65A. Improper use of motor vehicle

(1) A person must not drive a motor vehicle in a manner which causes the motor vehicle to undergo loss of traction by one or more of the motor vehicle's wheels.

Penalty: 5 penalty units."

You will note that there is no mention of "highway" in this offence. Which means the offence occurs ANYWHERE. Yes, that's right...even if you were doing circle-work in the back paddock of a farm in the middle of nowhere, entirely on private property, you would still commit the offence.

Also, the organisers of Drag Tag do NOT have permits for the burnouts and drifting that goes on in the 'skid pan' there. So if the cop wanted to be a smart ass, any person taking part in the driving events can be charged and have their car impounded.

Just so you all know.....as taken from NS.com....

"65A. Improper use of motor vehicle

(1) A person must not drive a motor vehicle in a manner which causes the motor vehicle to undergo loss of traction by one or more of the motor vehicle's wheels.

Penalty: 5 penalty units."

You will note that there is no mention of "highway" in this offence. Which means the offence occurs ANYWHERE. Yes, that's right...even if you were doing circle-work in the back paddock of a farm in the middle of nowhere, entirely on private property, you would still commit the offence.

Also, the organisers of Drag Tag do NOT have permits for the burnouts and drifting that goes on in the 'skid pan' there. So if the cop wanted to be a smart ass, any person taking part in the driving events can be charged and have their car impounded.

But hey the law is the law.

Now that everyone knows that law, if you risk it by going to a "legal off-street" event and get done for the hoon laws then as you black/white viewed people say, "tough luck".

BECAUSE THE LAW IS THE LAW SO STOP WHINGING :(

I just read your post, nothing gets passed you huh?

All this crap about car parks being public highway and all that....it is just too damn confusing....

I think push bike all the way now!

hahaa :wave:

No, i dont believe a private property to be a sanctioned road section.

I never have and cops have always said it was the case.

It just took me a few beers and the expenditure of a little tad of my growing displeasure @ the Vic Police for me to actually go digging through the Road Safety Act :(

All that legal jargon confuses me, they need a translater.

If there is an online translater to convert Japanese to english, sure there can be a translater to convert legal jargon to regular english?

Have a few beers John.. or bourbons.

Whatever tickles your fancy really

Its the only "translator" ive found that works consistently for me :(

Thanks ToF.

I was very hard done by 5 years ago when i was young and naieve.

I will never let a cop/court dick me hard like that again because: "i simply didnt know better"

Havent read the whole thread. Same old same old.

But i will add this. The Vic govt seem confused. The Dept of Sports and Recreation is spending money with CAMS and a private contractor in order to develop plans to improve access to mtorsport facilities...amongst other things.

Two of the main objectives are :

* Providing facilities which meet community sport and recreational needs;

* Identifying and evaluating secondary advantages that would enable motor sport to work with and complement other industries and/or activities (eg: tourism for regions, junior development, young driver road safety awareness programs, etc);

There wont be any need for facilities if they force all the cars off the road and take all the licences of drivers interested in motorsport.

Im all for getting along, and i agree the average modifed car owner may have to wear a little heat for a while after the Noble Park thing. But im not sure the current approach has been thought through by the powers to be.

The police are using the book. Ok, have to accept that. I would love to see a little more discretion being shown as like any bloke and plenty of girls many like their cars as well. But what i think needs to happen is the book needs to change.

Otherwise who is the Govt kidding with this venture with CAMS?

inark, check the previous page, down the bottom, sky's reference to the 43th post, and i've got it quoted down near the bottom

that post wasnt stating they pulled over the people doing burnouts or "hooning" outside the venue. Thats just Ks interpretation.

Nor did it state the venue owners encourage the cops to hang right outside the venue so people cant get past without being harrassed.

Once again... people arent reading posts properly and just getting on their high horse and assuming.

Sorry shouts of entrapment are just plain wrong.

vicpol didn't sell or fit any modified parts, they also didn't suggest or encourage that it be done. They didn't make johnnos commy have bald tyres or cause any other rwc issues....So they didn't invite the people that they also didn't sell/fit/encourage to modify the vehicles of to the event that they didn't organise.

WRONG, police cars are fitted with a "performance chip" are they not, now i thought modifying or aftermarket ECU's were not allowed... they are under the law also, not above it...

anyways on another note, does anyone know what "1 penalty unit"

is worth, eg $monerty value / demerit points?

Yup!! Vic police sends out a clear message, "I have a better chance on the back roads and get away with it, rather than, going to venues such as drag tag knowing they will be there waiting. Yup got that loud n clear.Thanks

Edited by mlyf16
specially ones with no cat converter (general modifications that you get busted for) arent really "SAFETY" problems, they are more epa and pollution laws set in place to protect emmision standards, our atmotsphere etc, so how is it 'OK' if you use your motor vehicle with these epa breaking modifications on a private property? its still polluting isnt it?

Do you know what catalytic converters do?

They help convert poisonous chemicals to non-poisonous ones. So in other words, people driving around with punched cats or test pipes are actually poisoning themselves and those around them. And you don't need to breathe that much of it in for it to affect your body, unlike carbon dioxide which isn't technically poisonous and you'd need a low oxygen content in the air for it to be dangerous.

At least with a dedicated track car its not being driven every day. There isn't a chance of it sitting in peak-hour traffic poisoning those around you. And, relatively speaking, there are few track cars out there. The ones that do exist don't sit in kilometres worth of bumper-to-bumper traffic, idling away. If every car on the road ran without a cat, a significant number of people would probably die during the morning and afternoon jams.

So yes, busting people for cat-less cars is a safety concern.

As for loud exhausts, off-street they've generally zoned the area. Most race tracks and drag strips will have a generous buffer or sound baffling to stop the neighbours from being unduly stressed about the noise these cars generate. Your typical suburban street doesn't. No its not about safety, but its about consideration and respect to the people whose homes and places of business you happen to be driving past.

I thought you fooil sik modifying types were all about respect. Its more than just a bunch of randoms thinking your wang is big because of some number printed on a sheet of paper.

I don't think its fair to put up a defect station somewhere that people in the modified car community put in the effort n try do something legal for once...

They may be trying, but if people are still driving on the street in cars that aren't road legal then its a half-arsed effort because they're still blatantly failing.

Being "legal" means more than not street racing nor doing burnouts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...