Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 5 months later...
^^^ yeah but it is a untidy solution and TRAC is a pain in the ass at the best of times

Need it for when my sister & mum borrow my car from time to time...

I'd never let them use it without TCS...

well i'll let you know, i was thinking of taking my throttle body into work and chopping it in half. then remote mounting the traction control half of the body about a foot down the intake pipe like just after the bend. it should work pretty easy since its such a simple design, because all it does is create a restriction in the intake.

it should make piping alot easier since it would be like installing a r33 throttle body but retaining traction control. Im also going to make adaptor plate for the aac valve so if it works i'll post a cad drawing or a stencil. you see I'm a cheap ass and i work for an engineering company that will do all my welding and fabby work for free..................... go me lol

also are the 3 flanges on the bottom for the water, are they the same on the r34???

regards

chris

  • 5 months later...
ps traction control is actualy realy good if you grind the butterfly down a bit, then it wont let you spin the wheels but also wont let you stall it when you do a 5k clutch dump. i did a thread on how to make it work if you wanna search for it.

Link???

  • 1 year later...

Updated for those asking where my pics were of a R34 neo with greddy plenum, Can a mod fix the OP thread title? i could not find it for the guys as it said Greedy not GREDDY ;)

Can anynone 100% confirm that the Greedy (it's Greddy not Greedy - BB) plenum will fit the R34 neo? Besides upgrading to a larger TB...what else is needed?

cheers!!

Its Gr-eddy, as in the mountain range Great Eddy where a certain high profile japanese drift king or Dori kin used to do his thing

  • 1 year later...

Hey anybody got a pic of what the RB25det neo throttle body looks like? I'm not sure if the neo in a series 2 stagea has one (it's awd).

Stageas do not have traction control, so they do not have the traction control butterfly and throttle motor. Just a nice R33 stylez TB (I don't know that it is the same as an R33 one excatly, but it's the same in overall concept).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...