Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A bit like the reply I got to that pm I sent you the other day?

i gave you some constructive criticism. feel free to post it if you want!

Should there be somthing said in regards to this Ha! Nowwwwww you want to be the club supporter she ws not rude. She was too the point. If you feel the need to defend the club then go into the Whore threads

( You know which ones I mean) And start cutting sick in their

I have ALWAYS been a club supporter! Please show me where i have not been!

And whore thread? there is a club in the whore threads? didn't know that! Guess that means we have 10 different clubs! the whore threads are for people to talk about how their weekend was, and where their next meet is.. the NSW section is for car talk and overall nsw discussions

Moanie, I didn't write that post with any malice/ridicule intended as clearly stated in the first line. I was simply stating the double standards that seem to be appearing lately. I don't want to be caught up in all the political/personal vendetta crap going on within the NSW club and some of its members.

My main point was why now... why this post... hundreds of others have written the exact same phrase without the reply that Liz posted? Herself included... its kinda obvious that people are trying to stir the pot.

no probs chickie! Neither was I! I also was of the opinion that the post was rude.. but i know what you mean about others using the same phrase... its just not happened in nsw that i've seen!

At the end of the day we are meant to help each other! i think its great dif took the time to do a quick search for the thread started, i just thought she could have presented the information a little better. Note, the thread starter did say he 'tried' to search... so its not like he jsut posted a thread without bothering! I'd understand if that was the case.. the fact that he tried and had no luck, would lead me to expect a polite response.

And start cutting sick in their

I'm having a little trouble with that one Andrew.... I think you listen to too much James Brown.... Hahahaha!! now.. befooooore you start... it's a joke.. ok? haha kinda stuffses.

Ya, maybe i was a bit blunt towards corinne. Her post came across a bit rude, and i probably didn't help the situation by being rude back!

Despite what people think, I certainly wasn't out to stir the pot, I just tackled an issue the wrong way!

Sorry Corinne!

lol.....

No cat fights... just confused with the double standards.............. :rofl:

Although mud is better than jelly..... chocolate is even better! :thumbsup:

Mud! thats so dirty! I like you! ahahaha

Also i've heard that if you repeatedly get defected for the same thing, you WILL lose points. but only if they see you've been defected for it before.

Has anyone else heard this? :sorcerer:

Mud! thats so dirty! I like you! ahahaha

Also i've heard that if you repeatedly get defected for the same thing, you WILL lose points. but only if they see you've been defected for it before.

Has anyone else heard this? :sorcerer:

lol.... :rofl:

Check out smoky's post on pg1 (no 17). If its cleared you won't.. if its a previous defect which remains uncleared then you will be fined with points.

Now that its safe in here again...

what about for having a un-engineered high mount turbo? do you get done for points for that?

*schlaps Anthony*

Only if it was previously defected and remains uncleared!

Although I'd be getting that puppy engineered. You have the emissions pass which is all you need to engineer the turbo, exhaust, FMIC. Thats the hard part done! ... they can still defect you as it is not engineered and cause you the hassle of clearing it all up.

Everytime they go over Lucas's sunny they try and get anything thats not on the certificate! Although pretty much the rocks stuck in the tyre tread are engineered on that thing... its a losing battle everytime!

glad to see the issues here self resolved, unless anyone stil has an issue?

but to be on topic

what about if you have a completely enclosed pod and a fmic? still defectable?

It shouldn't be defectable unless the cop is a real Ahole.

I don't think you have to enclose the fmic but I have heard you have to have mesh behind the front bar in front of the fmic?

Maybe to stop someone from getting sucked in.. lol..

I think we should get an engineer to post up about this stuff the RTA rules aren't that specific.

as I dont know for sure, only hearsay. You are only allowed one induction mod. Ie. only fmic or only pod. But if the pod is engineered and the fmic is engineered, are they ok together or only one or the other/

Now that its safe in here again...

what about for having a un-engineered high mount turbo? do you get done for points for that?

anything that differs from stock will need tot be engineered :thumbsup:

Mud! thats so dirty! I like you! ahahaha

Also i've heard that if you repeatedly get defected for the same thing, you WILL lose points. but only if they see you've been defected for it before.

Has anyone else heard this? :sorcerer:

lol.... :rofl:

Check out smoky's post on pg1 (no 17). If its cleared you won't.. if its a previous defect which remains uncleared then you will be fined with points.

be careful with this though guys! Cause i got defected twice for my pod and exhaust (this was by a rta/epa setup though and not just by a highway patrolperson) and the second time, the epa took m to court... so be wary of second time defects!

as I dont know for sure, only hearsay. You are only allowed one induction mod. Ie. only fmic or only pod. But if the pod is engineered and the fmic is engineered, are they ok together or only one or the other/

That is totally confuzzling.

I would assume that they would be too seperate mods and that both would would need to be engineered.

Is that right?

as I dont know for sure, only hearsay. You are only allowed one induction mod. Ie. only fmic or only pod. But if the pod is engineered and the fmic is engineered, are they ok together or only one or the other/

this 'one intake mod' thing is victorian. not nsw.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...