Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i think that old (the larger throttle body does nothing for you is bull) my opinion .

Yeah i agree with ya. Did you see the Autosalon article from ages ago where all they did was a Hypertune throttle upgrade? They left the same sized pipework, just used a silicone reducer and gained 10-15kw through out the rev range and that was on a stock turbo at it's limits. That's decent gains in my books.

  • Replies 539
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

In some ways it's like upsizing the turbine. Less restriction to the whole air in / air out process should equal easier power.

Can you post up a decent picture of the throttle cable mount?

ok ill do that for you

Thanks for those - the detail is great. I'm in the same boat as zebra.

Do the angles work ok?

yep you have to bend the bracket a bit also have the bracket a bit sideways make it first then shape it on a belt sander to make it look like its a straight fit,i hope you know what i mean.its has to be at a angle so the cable wont hit the plenum and is straight in front of the throttle body ,also the holes to the bracket make slits so you can move it in the position you need. (belt sander last thing you do)

Edited by WARLORD

Yep, the end result sort of tells the story - I did notice that slight kink.

Searching through my ally and steel supplies I may use either some 50 x 50 x 6 angle ally, or 50 x 6 flat steel as a starting point. Either way should work fairly well, but probably yours as a template is the easiest.

Main point is to get that cable pulling from the right spot, in a fairly straight plane and avoid that bloody kink that I've seen a few people end up with as the cable runs into the plenum.

thanks

With some help from my mate, we knocked up this item. As shown, 90% complete - it needed a slit cut for the cable to slip through, and a coat of paint.

post-19642-1245410121_thumb.jpg

One area we paid attention to was getting a dead straight pull on the throttle linkage. Hopefully our placement of the hole gives a nice sweep for the cable leading up to the bracket.

Bugger all materials used in making the thing, but I don't think it would be easy to get the positions right with manifold and throttle body all bolted up to the engine. Very similar in execution to yours Warlord, and definitely handy to have some fabricating skills.

With some help from my mate, we knocked up this item. As shown, 90% complete - it needed a slit cut for the cable to slip through, and a coat of paint.

post-19642-1245410121_thumb.jpg

One area we paid attention to was getting a dead straight pull on the throttle linkage. Hopefully our placement of the hole gives a nice sweep for the cable leading up to the bracket.

Bugger all materials used in making the thing, but I don't think it would be easy to get the positions right with manifold and throttle body all bolted up to the engine. Very similar in execution to yours Warlord, and definitely handy to have some fabricating skills.

one small but big thing is the cable must sit behind and fit under the plenum look at mine again as the firt one i made would not let the cable fit in with out jamming it in which i do not recomend ill measure the lenght you need it looks close ill let you know tomorrow

Edited by WARLORD
i think that old (the larger throttle body does nothing for you is bull) my opinion .

Did you measure the boost at WOT before the throttle body and found it was higher than the boost after the throttle body, hence proving that the throtte body was a restriction?

I have, at 315 rwkw and guess what? The boost was the same, hence proving that a larger throtte body would have achieved nothing, except waste time and money.

Cheers

Gary

Surely just a boost difference before and after the throttle isn't an indication of whether a throttle body will give gains throughout the rev range :P

It may not be a restriction at those power levels, however it doesn't mean that no more performance can be gained.

If you upgrade the size of the throttle and pipework to suit it can allow more airflow at the same boost pressure does it not?

Airflow (Q) = Velocity (V) x Cross sectional Area (A)

An increase in the cross sectional area at the same velocity means an increase in airflow (CFM). So why would it not make more power, regardless whether it's a "restriction" or not?

I'm an Engineering student so if i am wrong please explain why as i am curious about this whole throttle upgrade.

Here's the Autosalon article i was talking about earlier.

post-35676-1245417489_thumb.jpg

Edited by PM-R33
Did you measure the boost at WOT before the throttle body and found it was higher than the boost after the throttle body, hence proving that the throtte body was a restriction?

I have, at 315 rwkw and guess what? The boost was the same, hence proving that a larger throtte body would have achieved nothing, except waste time and money.

Cheers

Gary

i really think you need to re test.

its not a waste if it is done properly like every mod should be done not just chucking it on and hoping for the best you should know that.

the dyno has increase boost and the car was not even re tuned.

if you are going to turn this into somthing please don't post here as this is my topic with the results i have achieved and i don't want it to turn stupid again.

love always. lol

Nick

Edited by WARLORD
yer that will not work

I got it to work this morning :rofl2: (i have the standard throttle body with adapter though)

its not 100% perfect but pretty damn close.

I had to make a spacer for the accelerator pedal and cable but that was easy enough

Surely just a boost difference before and after the throttle isn't an indication of whether a throttle body will give gains throughout the rev range :rofl2:

It may not be a restriction at those power levels, however it doesn't mean that no more performance can be gained.

That doesnt make sense to me - if it doesnt restrict airflow it is not going to affect power.

If you upgrade the size of the throttle and pipework to suit it can allow more airflow at the same boost pressure does it not?

Airflow (Q) = Velocity (V) x Cross sectional Area (A)

An increase in the cross sectional area at the same velocity means an increase in airflow (CFM). So why would it not make more power, regardless whether it's a "restriction" or not?

You've assumed velocity is constant, which is not true.

I'm an Engineering student so if i am wrong please explain why as i am curious about this whole throttle upgrade.

Each section of the intake path introduces pressure loss (except the compressor of course!) and in some cases the loss introduced by a particular section is negligible, which is what Gary is saying. Checking the boost either side will tell you if there has been pressure loss. Lower pressure = less air mass = less power. If the piping into and out of the throttle are the same ID as the throttle, there's unlikely to be a change of much gain. If you're changing plenum to a larger ID, its likely to help.

Are you studying fluid dynamics at the moment? IIRC that's where this stuff is covered.

Now back on topic: Warlord you're a nut, but in a good way. The car is very nice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
    • I assume clearances were all a-okay?
    • Shock tower brace is in +5Kw....LOL  
×
×
  • Create New...