Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

Sorry to bring up an old thread, but i need a bit of help.

I will be installing my nismo 555cc injectors and setting up my power fc for the injectors in the next couple of weeks (running a HKS 3037 Pro S and all the supporting mods) before i book it in for a tune, i have worked out the injector correction and injector latency correction numbers that i need to change in the PFC, can somone please comfirm for me that these are 100% correct? :)

"INJECTOR CORRECTION"

- Formula = stock 370cc divided by nismo 555cc = 0.66cc x 100 = 66%.

So i would go into the power fc and change the INJ correction to 66%, correct?

"INJECTOR LATENCY CORRECTION"

From what i have found the latency for the nismo's is 0.71msec and stock is 0.52msec

- Formula = nismo 0.71msec minus stock 0.52msec = 0.19msec

So i would change the INJ Latency numbers for each injector to 0.19msec, correct?

Hopefully this can help people in the future that are looking for the correction numbers :D.

By the way, someone should sticky this thread!!

Cheers

i did not check your maths but the theory and formula's are correct.

therefore if your maths is correct you are ok to go :rofl:

deatschwerks 450cc RB25det sidefeed injectors

Min Open time (ms) max idc 6v 7v 8v 9v 10v 11v 12v 13v 14v 15v 16v 17v

1.1 94% 5.89 4.48 2.97 2.25 1.88 1.73 1.46 1.37 1.25 1.12 1.09 1.02

deatchwerks 550cc RB25det sidefeed injectors

6v 7v 8v 9v 10v 11v 12v 13v 14v 15v 16v 17v

5.88 3.50 2.62 2.07 1.80 1.56 1.42 1.32 1.19 1.11 1.07 0.95

I'll check mine, I have 555cc Nismo's running.

I found anything under 0.30ms and I couldn't do a thing.

They were really hard to set.

You can have my settings if you want, they seem to work perfectly.

I think its 77% and 0.44msec. I'll double check on my way home this afternoon.

I'll check mine, I have 555cc Nismo's running.

I found anything under 0.30ms and I couldn't do a thing.

They were really hard to set.

You can have my settings if you want, they seem to work perfectly.

I think its 77% and 0.44msec. I'll double check on my way home this afternoon.

Sounds good :banana:, would be good to have your settings just incase mine dont work when i put my numbers into the power fc

Any idea why yours only work on 0.30msec? did you try the 66% and 0.19msec (using the formula in the power fc FAQ) before adjusting them yourself?

Is anyone else using nismo 555cc's able to go into there PFC and check what settings they have theirs set to? would be a big help!

Cheers

  • 3 weeks later...

I just finished installing my nismo 555cc injectors, i set up the injectors settings in the PFC like this: injectors correction = 66%, latency correction = 0.18msec (when i worked this out i came up with 0.19msec but the PFC latecy correction only goes up in 2's so i had to choose either 0.18msec or 0.20msec, i tried both and they didnt seem to be much different).

Started the car and it seems to run ok, i havent driven it, have only had it idling, it seems to idle "ok" but it is a bit rough, does this sound normal? is it just running a bit to rich? it dosent seem to smell overly rich.

Im dropping my car off to the tuners on monday so imtrying to get everything running the best i can so he dosent have to spend to much time stuffing around with it.

I got this figure from Google as i wanted to get the 555cc NISMO injectors for my GTS25t as well. Latency is 0.75msec. So settings for my Apexi Power FC are calcutated as such;

370 / 555 = 0.67 x 100 = 67%

0.75 - 0.528 = +0.222msec

Something like that.

Edited by teng

I just went out and started my car up again just to see how it was running, took two goes to get it started, still idling very lumpy, also it is now "spitting" lots of white smoke out the exhaust and smells super rich, almost like its just spraying pure petrol out the exhaust, it dosent idle to bad just a bit lumpy and rough, took out #1 spark plug and it was a little wet and smells of fuel.

Will the white smoke just be from it running way to rich? i always thought if it was running too rich it would have been black smoke, the smoke dosent smell like oil at all.

I think i might just leave the settings how they are now, even though its not running to great, im sure my tuner will be able to sort things out.

ok well i'll tell you my experiences...

I was using the default setting for what should be correct for the nismos 555ccs: being 66.5% and 0.18ms.

my car (r33 rb25det) was running way to rich so now im still running 0.18ms latency but 60% injector size correction. i once read that the factory injectors are 340cc not 370cc.

has anyone ever actually measured them??? or got this info from nissan?

Just had my car tuned a couple of days ago, he left used the injector settings that i had already set up in the PFC.

So just to clarify for future rb25det owners in the process of setting up their PFC for nismo 555cc injectors, use these settings, just like shown in the PFC FAQ

INJ correction = 66%

Latency correction = 0.18msec

Hope this helps people in the future!

Cheers :thumbsup:

  • 1 month later...
So what would be the correction for:

Going from 555cc to 740cc Nismo?

ignore the fact you have 555 and refer to the simple formula divide the original injector cc by the new injector cc. In your case 50%

  • 4 months later...

hey guys

i finally have some nismo 555cc injectors for my R32 gtst with rb20det. I am running a remaped ecu at the momment and will be changing over to the pfc pro i have laying around and these injectors before i drive it most likely to godzilla motorsports for a tune.

I am trying to work out two things so i can drive it there. What the new injector correction and latency is, and also if i need to add a gtr resistor pack when i install the injectors. I am only second guessing things because i noticed they have the same part number as the 555s for the 32 gtr. I purchased them from greenline and they didnt say anything about needing one but i didnt ask either.

I have read thru the pfc faq (thanks paul), and from what i can work out the correction and latency is something like this:

Old SIZE / New Size = Correction

New Latency - Old Latency = Latency Correction

So i think rb20 stock is

260 / 555 = .4684 * 100 = 46.8468%

.? - .71 = ?

So basically i dont know the latency for the nismo 555cc injectors when they are for the rb20det, i think most of the info in this thread is for the yellow rb25 ones :rolleyes:

Cheers guys

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...