Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

My gtt has around 250kw at the treads with an aftermarket turbo, pfc and all. It was tuned with Shell V Power 98.

I was wondering if i run V Power Racing 100 at the drags, would it help or hurt the power output? is the different fuel gonna mess up the tune, a/f ratio and etc? hence good or bad for engine/turbo?

Cheers guys

Edited by BaysideBlue
  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

not a ad idea at all. it will not improve your performance at all but will make your safety margin slightly bigger. will also not mess up your AFR's.

I agree, you will improve your protection from pinging but you may actually lose a couple of killerwatts due to to fuel being less volitile....(burns slower so you need to add more timing to compensate) but i doubt that you would notice as it would be more to do with air temp/relative altitude than 2 RON difference in fuel.

Andrew

Stick with your usual fuel and octane booster. You won't gain 7 points on anything but base unleaded, maybe 2-3 tops on 98 octane.

I recently ran some nulon pro strength through mine on the dyno and it had no effect on the mixtures and increased the detonation threshold significantly (enough that i could add 5 degrees of timing before any audible pinging).

Adding toluene effects your mixtures as you have to add so much of the shit to get a significant increase in the RON of your fuel. Were talking 5-6 litres per tank of fuel (thats near enough to 10% by volume) to get a couple of point increase.

Adding toluene effects your mixtures as you have to add so much of the shit to get a significant increase in the RON of your fuel. Were talking 5-6 litres per tank of fuel (thats near enough to 10% by volume) to get a couple of point increase.

and if you stuff up things can go pretty wrong. i was asking my mechanic about toluene and he said it is better to stay away from it cause a small mistake can have large consequences.

Depending on how far you want to go, toluene is the best option. It only aided F1 back in the 80's to achieve the high horsepower figures they had and ran.

Problem with the octane boosters is the higher the initial ron of the fuel the lesser increase you see from adding it.

mad082 can you explain your mechanics reasoning for not using/advising toluene?

V-Power will actually LEAN OUT your mixture, not richen it up.

Not by a lot, but mine went from 12.0 to about 12.2 on the Optimax Extreme.

When I put it in my car, I normally leave the AFR and just add some timing.

But I don't use it often.

thanks guys for the replys.

so using 100 octane fuel on 98 tuned engine will lean out the mixture which would increase safety margin but need to adjust timing. how exactly do i do that?

and also, is it worthwhile doing (pay the extra cost for v power racing + adjusting timing) for the so said slight increase of safety margin, without any real performance increase over the quater mile?

so using 100 octane fuel on 98 tuned engine will lean out the mixture which would increase safety margin but need to adjust timing. how exactly do i do that?

rule of thumb is if you are asking how to tune your car then dont do it yourself. Get a tuner and a dyno

Edited by Bl4cK32

higher-octane fuel will lean out the mixtures, except as the the octane level is the fuel's rating of resistance to detonation it will probably be safer for the motor.

However, using a higher octane fuel without a tune may not see any gains because the burn rate will be reduced and the motor will not be running optimally. Best bet, just run 98octane what your car was tuned with.

If you really must, an amateur way of adjusting ignition timing to get the most out of a higher octane fuel is done by moving the CAS anti-clockwise slightly, test driving and repeat until you reach an acceptable knock level i.e. 20-30. Or read up on paulr33 PFC guide.

Edited by BAMR33
higher-octane fuel will lean out the mixtures, except as the the octane level is the fuel's rating of resistance to detonation it will probably be safer for the motor.

However, using a higher octane fuel without a tune may not see any gains because the burn rate will be reduced and the motor will not be running optimally. Best bet, just run 98octane what your car was tuned with.

ok sounds like theres no point using v power racing without a tune or at least adjust timing then.

If you really must, an amateur way of adjusting ignition timing to get the most out of a higher octane fuel is done by moving the CAS anti-clockwise slightly, test driving and repeat until you reach an acceptable knock level i.e. 20-30. Or read up on paulr33 PFC guide.

thanks i will try that.

if thats how your planning on doing it. Dont bother. Unless you got a timing light and your checking base timing as you go, its not worth it mate. Will probably cause more problems then its worth.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...