Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 199
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

haha, once P platers start owning a model, or if they get modified by rajab or those barbi guys, they should be gracefully withdrawn from supercar-dom.

/stir

Don't be quoting me about not appreciating. The time and cost of spent getting my car bare metal resprayed, all the mods etc are unrecoverable. you want to buy it? $70K - it's yours.

Bottom line - old technology, better cars now.

well no shit sherlock...a 2007 performance car VS a 1989 performance car in technology....geee, hmmmm, yeh i wonder which would have more advanced technology.

and i WILL quote u about 'not aprreciating', because i refuse to believ u truly appreciate the skyline. sounds like u wasted ur money resrpraying and modding ur gtr...u shoulda purchased a nice new car with all the fantastic new technology and safety features.

Its built off a passenger car. How can it be a "supercar", which should have a bespoke platform?

The only true supercar made by a big Japanese car manufacturer is the NSX.

My biased opinion...hondas are gay....

its a shame the NSX lacks supercar performance...

the nsx-S Zero and nsx-R are the exceptions...

LOL...nope. Still Hondas so still gay :blink:

Maybe if they had all that technology in an alloy bodied 4.5L V8 sports car...then it would be ok :) S2000 shoud at least have a 3l V6. Look at their F1 team and tell me they have a clue what they are doing :(

Actually, i think i will stop before getting banned or sacked from my job for wasting time...all because im bored. Interesting that the Skylien made the Top 10. I love mt Nissans but the ZED shoud have been on that list before the Skyline!

LOL...nope. Still Hondas so still gay :(

Maybe if they had all that technology in an alloy bodied 4.5L V8 sports car...then it would be ok :) S2000 shoud at least have a 3l V6. Look at their F1 team and tell me they have a clue what they are doing :)

oh come off it Roy. With the exception of toyota, Honda was the force to be reckoned with in the late 80s and early 90s..

we both know producing an engine that goes like stink and a complete car that goes like stink are two VERY different things..

is it ok if the F1 boys start whoring the thread? :blink: :sorcerer:

Honda shoudl stick with building engines. That they can do. Running a GP team or building an exciting car???? Some Euro fella should tell Honda Execs that it needs to be at least 3.0L if its going to do anything in the streaight line department with all the weight they have to carry these days :blink:

Now Chev and the Corvette...yeh baby

dyno1.jpg

Now Chev and the Corvette...yeh baby

435570932_755d504f08.jpg

What a co-inkidence... next DECA then Brisby? I'll even let you hold an extra steering wheel in the passenger seat and pretend you were driving.

Not a real survey. The great Aussie sportscar is missing. V8 ute with a massive gas guzzling DONK!!

Ooops, iron block so it can't make it.

Can't believe Marcus is on the rags. Mr Nice usually. The GTR must getting to him........

Honda shoudl stick with building engines. That they can do. Running a GP team or building an exciting car???? Some Euro fella should tell Honda Execs that it needs to be at least 3.0L if its going to do anything in the streaight line department with all the weight they have to carry these days :)

Now Chev and the Corvette...yeh baby

dyno1.jpg

now where exactly do you draw the line between super car, sports car and MUSCLE car..?? :blink::(

now where exactly do you draw the line between super car, sports car and MUSCLE car..?? :unsure: :unsure:

Meh, today the line is right here. Tomorrow over there, somewhre else another day :)

But sports car is built on its own platform and is built to go fast.

Supercar is built on a stand alone platform with lots of exotic materials and engineering ensuring that performance isnt compromised by silly stuff like grouns clearance, visibility or price.

Muscle cars and performance cars are things garnished from mass built ho hum cars and tweaked to get the shoppign done in a god awful hurry.

And if anyone bags the RB20, i will mince them up and use their refuse as egine oil. :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...