Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its only limited to around 30% under about 3000rpm

And its a pain in the arse to tune around. I still have the throttle restriction, my 0-100 time would be around 4.5 seconds but it could be much better.

I think it could be related to speed, under 30kph perhaps?

And its a pain in the arse to tune around. I still have the throttle restriction, my 0-100 time would be around 4.5 seconds but it could be much better.

I think it could be related to speed, under 30kph perhaps?

im wondering how you intend on getting around speed cut :?

4.5 is damn quick. what mods have you got to get those numbers?

(i just had a look at your Garage). You gave exhaust 6/10 and intake 10/10? Did you do a full exhaust turbo back? or just cat-back?

No more boost/mods to pull those numbers?

Edited by Sage222
4.5 is damn quick. what mods have you got to get those numbers?

(i just had a look at your Garage). You gave exhaust 6/10 and intake 10/10? Did you do a full exhaust turbo back? or just cat-back?

No more boost/mods to pull those numbers?

Plenty of both, I haven't updated the garage for a few months.

The previous exhaust was too loud so I bought a s/h cat back and fabricated my own 3.5 inch dump into a highflow cat.

I run a fairly small highflow at 20psi on E85. Current tune is 300awkw.

  • Like 1
Plenty of both, I haven't updated the garage for a few months.

The previous exhaust was too loud so I bought a s/h cat back and fabricated my own 3.5 inch dump into a highflow cat.

I run a fairly small highflow at 20psi on E85. Current tune is 300awkw.

Hang on... a custom exhaust, some ethenal, a high flow turbo running 20psi and you make 300awkw?? wow thats impressive.

Can the factory transmission, ECU, and injectors handle all that?

(you have me very interested) :D

Hang on... a custom exhaust, some ethenal, a high flow turbo running 20psi and you make 300awkw?? wow thats impressive.

Can the factory transmission, ECU, and injectors handle all that?

(you have me very interested) :D

He has an FMIC, upgraded trans, 610cc injectors, Tomei fuel pump and is running an E-manage Ultimate.....plus a couple of other home made bit's all of which you will need.

He has an FMIC, upgraded trans, 610cc injectors, Tomei fuel pump and is running an E-manage Ultimate.....plus a couple of other home made bit's all of which you will need.

How much all up you reckon Scotty? 6-8k? Pretty good value I'd say...

Then again a friend of mine got his stock 04 WRX to 190 awkw for 6k...all done at STI at Docklands...

How much all up you reckon Scotty? 6-8k? Pretty good value I'd say...

Then again a friend of mine got his stock 04 WRX to 190 awkw for 6k...all done at STI at Docklands...

Gearbox wiped out the budget, 4k there, Highflow was another 2k, the rest was bit by bit. I would guess 10k total with me doing all the labour/fabrication.

200awkw is about the limit of the stock intake, stock turbo will flow that at higher boost but will then fail. I would be interested to see what a stock setup would do on e85...

Really? I thought M35 had ~140 - 150 awkw...so exhaust adds 50 awkw!???

Yes, You are correct..

I think Cam is referring to adding an Emanage or something similar to produce a more efficient result that should be tunable to 190kw on the stock injectors.

Scotty, What mods did you do to the gearbox to cost $4K??

Valve body upgrade, metal plates between the clutches laser cut from thinner material so they could fit extra friction plates, Dominator 3k high stall torque converter. It was the first one they had seen, its not like other RE5's apparently.

I think I hit 179awkw on stock boost, if the standard turbo was steel wheeled, 200 wouldn't be a problem.

  • Like 1
Yes, You are correct..

I think Cam is referring to adding an Emanage or something similar to produce a more efficient result that should be tunable to 190kw on the stock injectors.

Yep, hence what I typed.

Bargain! :)

Should be able to get around that power level from stock with just an exhaust and tune on a VQ25det M35!

OK for the tv to work youll need a new tv tuner, whats available now im not sure that Asuka dont sell them (so i read)

getting the tv working while youre driving is not advisable and against the law, but if you HAVE to, there are override boxes that can do all this and literally just plug in. they come from japan, im surprised your car didnt have one fitted already!

check under the DVD tray andsee if there is a green light that is also a button. thats the override button for the tv.

  • Like 1

yeh im pretty sure i dont have one.

looking at the Trans ecu it looks like something was added and then taken off back to stock. Both me and scott assumed it would be the overide.

where can I get a Tuner from? its it a simple Jaycar type mod or is it more complex than im thinking. I was expecting it to be like the FM Band expander.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...