Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just out of curiosity. im no mechano. it could easely be a stupid question.

what would be a faster car around the track. our v8 super cars or a jgtc GTR?

why? and by how much?

i know the 32 destroyed the competition back then :thumbsup: . but what about now?

have they both raced on the same curcit? what were the times?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/
Share on other sites

different rules, difference style of racing.

supergt teams have 2 drivers, and both drivers must drive during a race. during pit stop only one action can be performed at one time.

so

-driver exit the car

-new driver enters the car

-fuel the car

-change the tyres

so u can not change the tyres untill the car is complete fuel, normal pit stop times for supergt cars in the 500class is around 30seconds.

also supergt have alot of aero-dynamics

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3461540
Share on other sites

different classes with different rules

i don't know the specifics but you can't be sure that they all have the same rules to abide by, they can't possibly be compared in their highly modified yet merticulously restricted to regulations trim

its like comparing apples and oranges

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3461544
Share on other sites

Some mag i was reading a few years ago, think it was speed, said toyota tested the supras at PI, and they were about 10sec a lap faster than the taxi's

I remember reading that exact same mag, it was definately SPEED. I think it was in 2005. They had a special on an Aussie driver and in the article they stated the JGTC supra was 10 sec faster per lap on the phillip island circuit during testing. So yes I think its safe to say they are significantly faster BUT the V8 supercars competition is a very different typre of racing - there differenent regs to be adhered to.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3462735
Share on other sites

Sorry but I would want to see a lap sheet from a timing system to believe the supergt cars are 10 sec quicker around phillip island

super car has 100+ hp more

supergt weighs less, has much better aero

but now way is there a 10 sec difference. 2sec from Shanghai sounds more like it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3463291
Share on other sites

Well one of closest thing we have to Super GT cars here is the Sports Sedans. On some circuits some of the cars lap can lap quicker than the V8s, and on other cars the V8s still hold the record for sedan lap times. There is only a couple of seconds tops in it though. I suspect you would probably find a similar story if the Jap cars raced a V8 supercar.

Otherwise all you can do really is guess.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3463984
Share on other sites

I actually met James Courtney last year and actually asked him about it, he used to race supras in jgtc (not 100% on this but think he also won an award for being the fastest overall driver in one of the seasons??), but races a ford V8 supercar now for jeld wen motorsport, came second this year in bathurst i'm pretty sure?

anyway, from what he said, they tested the jgtc cars at qld raceway once in the off season, and they were about 10 sec a lap quicker than the v8 supercar times. so they are pretty quick, but it's not really a fair comparison, they are completely different cars, built to completely different rules and regs.

Even the V8's now are pretty quick, if you have a look at the current V8 times around bathurst etc. you'll prob find that they are quicker than the group A r32 gtr's.. race car technology has gotten a lot better since the early 90's i guess.

Still would be great to see more makes fighting it out, instead of just fords and holdens..

just my 2c!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3464083
Share on other sites

Even the V8's now are pretty quick, if you have a look at the current V8 times around bathurst etc. you'll prob find that they are quicker than the group A r32 gtr's.. race car technology has gotten a lot better since the early 90's i guess.

Sure cage design has improved, data acquisition helped the cars lap quicker over the race distance. But most of the gains in lap time has been purely because of tyres.

Japanese GT cars are not even in compliance with the FIA GT cars. Last time they did that they got beaten by the Europeans and Americans with thwir Mclaren F1, Corvettes etc etc (in various classes) So the Japanese have their own class of GT cars which means they are not as readily able to race against the Prodrive Astons etc etc which is a real shame as it would be great to see them running at Le Mans against the Vettes etc.

It makes me giggle when ppl wrongly say that local Touring Car regs were changed to ban the GTR, when the truth is a few years later the Japanese turned their backs on the FIA homologated GT cars as they were gettign beaten by the Europeans. But to their credit, they tailor their class to suit their local market, ppl dont want to see 350Z getting beaten by 7.0L pushrod Vettes ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3465257
Share on other sites

back to 10 seconds faster around Phillip Island.....

just looking at PI Track records http://www.phillipislandcircuit.com.au/upl...gust%202007.pdf

Supertaxis 1.33

If a GT500 car is 10 secs quicker that makes it 1.23, and faster than:

F4000 (and outright) 1.24

Formula 3 1.27

Sports Sedan (fastest tourng car) 1.31

Superkarts (lunatics) 1.32

Formula 5000 1.31

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3465546
Share on other sites

LOL..ok stay with me here...

GP bikes do 1:29s at PI , V8 Supercars do 1:33s as Duncan pointed out. So thats about 4 seconds slower over a lap of fast flowing track.

At Sepang the best quali time for a JGTC in 2006 was 2:00.6, a GP bike will do a 2:01.3. So about 1 second quicker then a GP bike at a high speed track

At Twin Ring Motegi the GP bikes do 1:45.8s, where as in 2005 the JGTC cars were doing 1:46s, and in 2006 the JGTC cars did high 1:44s/low 1;45s. So at a more involved track the GP bikes are as quick

So if a GP bike is doing 1:29s at PI then its not a hige leap to say that at best a JGTC car may be 2 seconds quicker then a GP bike, more like within a second.

So, that means a V8 Supercar would be around 4-5 seconds slower then a JGTC, no way the JGTC car will be 10seconds quicker...NO WAY

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3465871
Share on other sites

yeah i was just putting it out there i wouldnt trust a magazine lol

I do wish the taxis where modded to the same level tho and had to use an engine from something they are producing.

Ie holden with their new 7.0ltr v8 and ford with their 4.0 inline six turbo

Also dont know if its 100% true but holden shouldnt be able to run ford parts, ie the diff :S

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/192688-us-or-the-japs/#findComment-3469907
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...