Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes your bulging discs are doing a great job of that. Strengthening doesn't fix bad form, correcting with proper technique does. I'm not avoiding any weakness here...the back and core get worked just as much in my method, only less susceptible to injury because it's a stricter movement.

My 2c on this one for what it is worth , from past experience.

You have a point about stabillity, thats why sitting or bending the knees with a relatively lighter weight is a good place to start in terms of 'balance'.

However, once you are over a certain weight (body weight for sure) you basically need to have lots of stabilisation all the way up. So legs to core to shoulder girdle ,even wrists. Each of these should not be troubled and totally up to the task before going crazy. They are supporting muscles so should have more than you need to balance and stabilise as the shoulder press should not be used to target them.

Even if you bend your knees or sit, not enough shoulder stabilisation or core strength will see you get an injury with bigger weight.

However , I think where Ghosty and Husky33 are comming from is; once you are lifting strong across those areas a bodyweight press with locked legs won't trouble you.

In the mean time, best practice is as you said ' slight bend in the knees' or sit down and for the safest plan use a lighter weight if you don't have the confidence to press.bodyweight yet.

Edited by rev210

160 as of tonight! And weighing in at 79.7kg...that's double bodyweight :D

165...somebody stop me! Head started spinning as soon as I locked it out :S

Gotta run out of steam soon; at this rate I'm adding 10kg per week.

Yes your bulging discs are doing a great job of that.

My back injury wasn't caused from MP, it was caused from overzealous DL'ing with bad form, which in my defence, I was fairly new to lifting back then and lacked the experience to know better - some of us just have to learn the hard way unfortunately. Hindsight is a wonderful thing...

Strengthening doesn't fix bad form, correcting with proper technique does.

Generally yes, but also no. Correcting technique doesn't automatically make you strong, you still have to train... and think about what 'form' is for a moment. Correct 'form' is generally the most efficient way to perform a movement or action, that doesn't mean it is automatically safe, for example, if a novice overloads the bar and tries the lift with "good form", injury may still occur because they are weak. On the flip side, doing movements in "bad form" but in a controlled manner to build strength in compromised position/less-efficient movement, aids in strengthening the movement when done in correct form, for example, "good mornings" to assist squats etc.

I'm not avoiding any weakness here...the back and core get worked just as much in my method, only less susceptible to injury because it's a stricter movement.

I disagree. CBF explaining why but as a simple test, try and do your seated press weights standing and tell me which is harder.

I don't do seated press, I do standing behind neck shoulder press...with split legs and knees slightly bent. My back stays strict throughout the whole set and I do 50kg x 10 for 3 sets + 55kg x 6 for 3 sets, so not that light.

I don't do seated press, I do standing behind neck shoulder press...with split legs and knees slightly bent. My back stays strict throughout the whole set and I do 50kg x 10 for 3 sets + 55kg x 6 for 3 sets, so not that light.

that's light

Hey, I probably couldn't do 60kgx10 atm, but i will be the first to admit that it is light. And the only reason it is light is because i don't train it as much as everything else, like yourself, and 99% of people.

It's actually pathetic when you look how much higher my bench is.

I don't do seated press, I do standing behind neck shoulder press...with split legs and knees slightly bent. My back stays strict throughout the whole set and I do 50kg x 10 for 3 sets + 55kg x 6 for 3 sets, so not that light.

it's not light for the conditioning goals you have but, it's really quite light if you are talking a standing press at your weight. Again only relative to people who care to lift heavy as their goal.

I'm sure you could train to do heavier if you wanted to but, you are doing what is best for your goals. You don't need to shovel huge weights on the shoulders without good reasons anyway.

I was the same up until 165kg lol, that was my figurative brick wall. I think my grip failed on 170kg at the same point I couldn't really complete the lift, and have only attempted it once.

Good work Birds, keep dat shit up!

Hey, I probably couldn't do 60kgx10 atm, but i will be the first to admit that it is light. And the only reason it is light is because i don't train it as much as everything else, like yourself, and 99% of people.

It's actually pathetic when you look how much higher my bench is.

it's not light for the conditioning goals you have but, it's really quite light if you are talking a standing press at your weight. Again only relative to people who care to lift heavy as their goal.

I'm sure you could train to do heavier if you wanted to but, you are doing what is best for your goals. You don't need to shovel huge weights on the shoulders without good reasons anyway.

It's not light in that the potential for injury is very much there should you use bad form, which is why I brought up what I lift for that exercise in the first place. It's like a 100kg deadlift - nothing in the scheme of lifting and what people are capable of, but you can still do a lot of damage if your form is out.

I was the same up until 165kg lol, that was my figurative brick wall. I think my grip failed on 170kg at the same point I couldn't really complete the lift, and have only attempted it once.

Good work Birds, keep dat shit up!

For someone with a spinal injury, that's a great lift! My grip felt like it had more in it, but 165kg was the first time my back had to put in a lot of effort to get the weight up / started running out of steam. Grip seems to be fine for 1RM stuff, it's the sets of 10 where sweat builds up and resetting my reps turns it to shit, even with much lower weights.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
    • Yep that is correct. It allows you to adjust the short throw range from what I can tell
×
×
  • Create New...