Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fair enough. What works for me is BBing hypertrophy combined with an upper body an lower body strength day:

Monday - Leg Strength + Core (deads and squats)
Tuesday - Chest (hyper.)
Wednesday - Shoulders and arms (predominantly lateral and posterior delts)
Thursday - Leg Hypertrophy
Friday - Back
Saturday - Upper Body Strength

BUT, this is just what works for me right now :yes:
AND, I change this layout every 4-6 weeks depending on other factors, next could be more strength dominant

Morning brahs.

I'm going to start my first foray in to fitness, initial aim is 5-6km jogging through hiking tracks 4 nights a week followed by some at home lifting/crunches/squats etc. I've worked an office job for the last 7 years so I figure this will be a good aim for first couple of weeks.

Is there some pre/protien/mix of supplements I should be looking at to help maximize workout?

If you're not already a runner 5-6ks daily might be a stretch but your body will tell you.

Get good shoes, and I mean trail shoes likle Salomons or something with Gortex lining, not Nike's they will get shredded easily.

As for Supps, basic WPI/WPC and some creatine will likely cover off all your needs as long as you're eating a relatively decent diet.

You can assess how well you recover before deciding if you need them as you'll mainly want them for recovery given your aim is fitness and not big strength gains.

Oh and as a fellow desk jockey, you're going to want to stretch a fair bit, it will help with everything. Sitters like us tend to have poor glute/hammy/hip flexor movement.

Edited by ActionDan

How's your DL'ing going Birds? You had some solid momentum at one point.

Average mate, I hit a bad bout of tonsilitis / yeast infection and lost 20kg off the bar from taking a couple weeks off. It's taking significantly longer to get the strength back :(

Back on the rise again, though. I think last session I pulled 100 x 10, 140 x 8, 180 x 1, 170 x 3.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...